Salis Francesco, Costaggiu Diego, Mandas Antonella
Department of Medical Sciences, and Public Health, University of Cagliari, SS 554 Bvio Sestu, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;8(1):12. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8010012.
Considering the need to intercept neurocognitive damage as soon as possible, it would be useful to extend cognitive test screening throughout the population. Here, we propose differential cut-off levels that can be used to identify mild and severe cognitive impairment with a simple and widely used first-level neurocognitive screening test: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We studied a population of 262 patients referred for cognitive impairment testing using the MMSE and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), a neuropsychological battery. The sample consisted of 262 participants with mean age 73.8 years (60-87), of whom 154 (58.8%) women. No significant gender-related differences in cognitive ability were identified. The two tests (MMSE and RBANS) showed a moderate correlation in identifying cognitive deficit. We used RBANS as a categorial variable to identify different degrees of cognitive impairment. Youden's J indexes were used to consider the better sensitivity/specificity balance in the 24-point cut-off score for severe cognitive deficit, 29.7-point score for mild cognitive deficit, and 26.1-point score for both mild and severe cognitive deficit. The study shows that the MMSE does not identify early cognitive impairment. Though different cut-offs are needed to discriminate different impairment degrees, the 26.1-point score seems to be preferable to the others.
考虑到需要尽快发现神经认知损伤,在整个人口中扩展认知测试筛查会很有用。在此,我们提出了不同的临界值,可用于通过一种简单且广泛使用的一级神经认知筛查测试:简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)来识别轻度和重度认知障碍。我们研究了262名因认知障碍测试而转诊的患者群体,使用了MMSE和可重复神经心理状态评估量表(RBANS),后者是一种神经心理测试量表。样本包括262名参与者,平均年龄73.8岁(60 - 87岁),其中154名(58.8%)为女性。未发现认知能力存在显著的性别差异。这两项测试(MMSE和RBANS)在识别认知缺陷方面显示出中度相关性。我们将RBANS作为分类变量来识别不同程度的认知障碍。约登指数用于考量在严重认知缺陷的24分临界值、轻度认知缺陷的29.7分临界值以及轻度和重度认知缺陷均适用的26.1分临界值时更好的敏感性/特异性平衡。该研究表明,MMSE无法识别早期认知障碍。尽管需要不同的临界值来区分不同程度的损伤,但26.1分的临界值似乎比其他临界值更可取。