• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种比较单根和双根 3D 打印 Ti-6Al-4V 植入物的临床前研究。

A preclinical study comparing single- and double-root 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V implants.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.

Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 17;13(1):862. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27712-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-27712-2
PMID:36650191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9845312/
Abstract

Recently, double-root implants have been investigated using 3D-printed technology. Here, we investigated damping capacity, microcomputed tomographic (micro-CT) and histological analyses of double-root 3D-printed implants compared with single-root 3D printed implants. Single- and double-root 3D-printed implants were fabricated and placed at both sides of mandibular third and fourth premolars in four beagle dogs. The damping capacity was measured, and periapical X-rays were taken every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. The bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD) around the implants were measured with micro-CT. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were measured in histological samples. The implant stability values between the groups were not significantly different, except at 4 and 12 weeks. The marginal bone changes were similar at the mesial and distal areas between the groups. The BV/TV and BMD values of the double-root 3D-printed implants showed no statistical difference through micro-CT analysis, but the double-root 3D-printed implants showed lower BIC and BAFO values through histomorphometric analysis compared to the single-root 3D-printed implants. Compared to single-root implants, 3D-printed double-root implants demonstrated comparable stability and bone remodeling around the fixtures, but the statistically significant bone loss in the furcation area remains problematic.

摘要

最近,利用 3D 打印技术研究了双根种植体。在这里,我们研究了双根 3D 打印种植体与单根 3D 打印种植体相比的阻尼能力、微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)和组织学分析。在四只比格犬的下颌第三和第四前磨牙的两侧分别制作和放置单根和双根 3D 打印种植体。测量了阻尼能力,并在 12 周内每 2 周拍摄根尖 X 线片。使用 micro-CT 测量种植体周围的骨体积/组织体积(BV/TV)和骨矿物质密度(BMD)。在组织学样本中测量了骨-种植体接触(BIC)和骨面积分数占有率(BAFO)。除了在 4 周和 12 周外,两组之间的种植体稳定性值没有显著差异。组间近远中骨边缘变化相似。通过 micro-CT 分析,双根 3D 打印种植体的 BV/TV 和 BMD 值没有统计学差异,但与单根 3D 打印种植体相比,双根 3D 打印种植体的 BIC 和 BAFO 值较低。与单根种植体相比,3D 打印双根种植体在固定装置周围显示出可比较的稳定性和骨重塑,但分叉区的统计学显著骨丢失仍然是一个问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/bb8e4cf4d677/41598_2023_27712_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/511c35cd14c9/41598_2023_27712_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/20cf38bf8034/41598_2023_27712_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/379586bce750/41598_2023_27712_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/87cad2a4af65/41598_2023_27712_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/bb8e4cf4d677/41598_2023_27712_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/511c35cd14c9/41598_2023_27712_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/20cf38bf8034/41598_2023_27712_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/379586bce750/41598_2023_27712_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/87cad2a4af65/41598_2023_27712_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd0/9845312/bb8e4cf4d677/41598_2023_27712_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A preclinical study comparing single- and double-root 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V implants.一种比较单根和双根 3D 打印 Ti-6Al-4V 植入物的临床前研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 17;13(1):862. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27712-2.
2
Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study.使用Ti-6Al-4V的3D打印多根牙种植体的晶格结构与实体结构的影响:一项临床前初步研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022 Aug;52(4):338-350. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2105720286.
3
Improved osseointegration of 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V implant with a hierarchical micro/nano surface topography: An in vitro and in vivo study.具有分级微/纳表面形貌的 3D 打印 Ti-6Al-4V 植入物的骨整合改善:体外和体内研究。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021 Jan;118:111505. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111505. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Comparative evaluation of 3D-printed and conventional implants in vivo: a quantitative microcomputed tomographic and histomorphometric analysis.3D 打印与传统植入物体内对比评估:定量微计算机断层扫描和组织形态计量学分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):21041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48315-x.
5
Comparison of 3D-Printed Dental Implants with Threaded Implants for Osseointegration: An Experimental Pilot Study.3D打印牙种植体与螺纹种植体骨结合的比较:一项实验性初步研究。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 28;13(21):4815. doi: 10.3390/ma13214815.
6
Sequential osseointegration of a novel implant system based on 3D printing in comparison with conventional titanium implants.新型基于 3D 打印的种植体系统与传统钛种植体的序贯骨整合比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Jun;34(6):627-638. doi: 10.1111/clr.14072. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
7
A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants.一项关于平台型与牙根型钛牙种植体骨愈合动力学的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):232-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01640.x.
8
The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces.表面处理对 3D 打印种植体早期骨整合的影响:三种不同表面的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 17;11(1):10453. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89961-3.
9
Bone healing around implants placed in subjects with metabolically compromised systemic conditions.在代谢受损的系统性疾病患者中植入物周围的骨愈合。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2023 Sep;111(9):1664-1671. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35264. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
Improvement in Osseointegration of Titanium Dental Implants After Exposure to Ultraviolet-C Light for Varied Durations: An Experimental Study in Beagle Dogs.经过不同时间紫外线 C 光照射后钛牙科种植体骨整合的改善:在比格犬中的实验研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Aug;80(8):1389-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of 3D-printed and conventional implants in vivo: a quantitative microcomputed tomographic and histomorphometric analysis.3D 打印与传统植入物体内对比评估:定量微计算机断层扫描和组织形态计量学分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):21041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48315-x.
2
Effect of polydeoxyribonucleotide on early bone formation in lateral bone augmentation with immediate implant placement: an experimental in vivo study.聚脱氧核苷酸对即刻种植体植入侧向骨增量早期骨形成的影响:一项体内实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 6;13(1):16853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43213-8.
3
Enhanced in vitro immersion behavior and antibacterial activity of NiTi orthopedic biomaterial by HAp-NbO composite deposits.
通过 HAp-NbO 复合材料沉积增强 NiTi 骨科生物材料的体外浸泡行为和抗菌活性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 25;13(1):16045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43393-3.