INSPECT-LB (Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique Et de Toxicologie-Liban), Beirut, Lebanon.
School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-03998-8.
The complementarity between research and teaching is still debated, although several higher education institutions require instructors to do research. In the absence of a consensus on this matter and given the lack of related studies in Lebanon, this study aimed to describe students' perception of research integration into teaching, and to link research and professional skills to quality teaching, using validated scales related to these concepts.
A standardized questionnaire was diffused to university students; it included validated scales: the Student Perception of Research Integration Questionnaire (SPRIQ), the Adapted-Teachers' quality assessment questionnaire (A-TQAQ), the Student Evaluation of Teaching short form (SET37-QS), and Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Health Research Questionnaire.
Research integration was well perceived, and teaching was well evaluated by 445 participants from various disciplines, particularly those of a higher socioeconomic level, majoring in health, and females, as indicated by their mean scores. Research-active instructors had a significantly better-perceived teaching quality (17%; p < 0.001) than their non-active counterparts. This finding was particularly true among postgraduate and higher GPA students. The multivariable analysis showed that the knowledge and attitude towards research were related to students' better perception of research integration and higher evaluation of teaching.
This study showed an overall good perception of research and teaching evaluation among participants from various disciplines, with research-active instructors having a better-perceived teaching quality. These findings could guide decisions on research integration into curricula using multidisciplinary methodologies to strengthen research integration and involve students in research activities.
尽管许多高等教育机构都要求教师进行研究,但研究与教学之间的互补性仍存在争议。由于在这个问题上缺乏共识,而且黎巴嫩缺乏相关研究,本研究旨在描述学生对将研究融入教学的看法,并将研究与专业技能与优质教学联系起来,使用与这些概念相关的经过验证的量表。
向大学生发放标准化问卷,其中包括经过验证的量表:学生对研究整合的感知问卷(SPRIQ)、适应教师的质量评估问卷(A-TQAQ)、教学评估短表(SET37-QS)和健康研究知识和态度问卷。
来自不同学科的 445 名参与者对研究整合有很好的感知,对教学评价也很好,特别是那些社会经济地位较高、主修健康科学和女性的参与者,他们的平均得分表明了这一点。与非活跃教师相比,积极从事研究的教师的教学质量感知(17%;p<0.001)要好得多。这一发现尤其适用于研究生和更高 GPA 的学生。多变量分析表明,对研究的知识和态度与学生对研究整合的更好感知和对教学的更高评价有关。
本研究表明,来自不同学科的参与者对研究和教学评估的总体看法良好,积极从事研究的教师的教学质量感知更好。这些发现可以指导使用多学科方法将研究融入课程的决策,以加强研究整合并让学生参与研究活动。