Novartis Institutes of Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
AbbVie, Irvine, California, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May;16(5):723-741. doi: 10.1111/cts.13480. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
The eye, which is under constant exposure to environmental pathogens, has evolved various anatomic and immunological barriers critical to the protection of tissues lacking regenerative capacity, and the maintenance of a clear optic pathway essential to vision. By bypassing the ocular barriers, intravitreal (IVT) injection has become the mainstay for the delivery of drugs to treat conditions that affect the back of the eye. Both small molecules and biotherapeutics have been successfully administered intravitreally, and several drugs have been approved for the treatment of (wet) age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. However, IVT injection is an invasive procedure, which requires sufficient technical expertise from the healthcare professional administering the drug. Potential side effects include bleeding, retinal tear, cataracts, infection, uveitis, loss of vision, and increased ocular pressure. Pharmaceutical companies often differ in their drug development plan, including drug administration techniques, collection of ocular tissues and fluids, ophthalmology monitoring, and overall conduct of nonclinical and clinical studies. The present effort, under the aegis of the Innovation & Quality Ophthalmic Working Group, aims at understanding these differences, identifying pros and cons of the various approaches, determining the gaps in knowledge, and suggesting feasible good practices for nonclinical and early clinical IVT drug development.
眼睛不断暴露于环境病原体中,因此进化出了各种解剖学和免疫学屏障,这些屏障对于保护缺乏再生能力的组织和维持清晰的视觉至关重要。通过绕过眼部屏障,玻璃体内(IVT)注射已成为将药物递送至治疗影响眼睛后部疾病的主要方法。小分子和生物疗法都已成功地通过玻璃体内给药,并且已经有几种药物被批准用于治疗(湿性)年龄相关性黄斑变性和糖尿病性黄斑水肿。然而,IVT 注射是一种侵入性程序,需要施药的医疗保健专业人员具备足够的技术专长。潜在的副作用包括出血、视网膜撕裂、白内障、感染、葡萄膜炎、视力丧失和眼压升高。制药公司在药物开发计划方面常常存在差异,包括药物给药技术、眼部组织和液体的收集、眼科监测以及非临床和临床研究的总体实施。在创新和质量眼科工作组的支持下,目前正在努力了解这些差异,确定各种方法的优缺点,确定知识差距,并为非临床和早期临床 IVT 药物开发提出可行的良好实践。