• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阔筋膜张肌移位术治疗不同类型和病因的复杂性肛直肠瘘:60 例的长期结果。

Gracilis muscle transposition in complex anorectal fistulas of diverse types and etiologies: long-term results of 60 cases.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Caritas Clinic St. Josef, Landshuter Str. 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 18;38(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04293-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-022-04293-6
PMID:36652018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9849283/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Complex fistulas often require several attempts at repair and continue to be a challenging task for the surgeon, but above all, a major burden for the affected patient. This study is aimed at evaluating the potential of gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) as a therapeutic option for complex fistulas of diverse etiologies.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted over a period of 16 years with a total of 60 patients (mean age 50 years). All were treated for complex fistula with GMT at St. Josef's Hospital in Regensburg, Germany. Follow-up data were collected and analyzed using a prospective database and telephone interview. Success was defined as the absence of fistula.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (44 women, 16 men; mean age 50 years, range 24-82 years) were reviewed from January 2005 to June 2021. Primary fistula closure after GMT was achieved in 20 patients (33%) and 19 required further interventions for final healing. Overall healing rate was 65%. Fistula type was heterogeneous, with a dominant subgroup of 35 rectovaginal fistulas. Etiologies of the fistulas were irradiation, abscesses, obstetric injury, and iatrogenic/unknown, and 98% of patients had had previous unsuccessful repair attempts (mean 3.6, range 1-15). In 60% of patients with a stoma (all patients had a stoma, 60/60), stoma closure could be performed after successful fistula closure. Mean follow-up after surgery was 35.9 months (range 1-187 months). No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications were observed in 25%: wound healing disorders (n = 6), gracilis necroses (n = 3), incisional hernia (n = 2), scar tissue pain (n = 2), suture granuloma (n = 1), and osteomyelitis (n = 1). In 3 patients, a second gracilis transposition was performed due to fistula recurrence (n = 2) or fecal incontinence (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Based on the authors' experience, GMT is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of complex fistulas when other therapeutic attempts have failed and should therefore be considered earlier in the treatment process. It should be seen as the main but not the only step, as additional procedures may be required for complete closure in some cases.

摘要

目的

复杂瘘管常需要多次修复,这对外科医生来说仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务,但最重要的是,对受影响的患者来说是一个重大负担。本研究旨在评估腹直肌移位术(GMT)作为治疗多种病因复杂瘘管的一种治疗选择的潜力。

方法

对德国雷根斯堡圣约瑟夫医院在 16 年内进行的 60 例患者(平均年龄 50 岁)的回顾性研究。所有患者均接受 GMT 治疗复杂瘘管。通过前瞻性数据库和电话访谈收集并分析随访数据。以无瘘管为成功标准。

结果

2005 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月共回顾 60 例患者(44 名女性,16 名男性;平均年龄 50 岁,范围 24-82 岁)。20 例患者(33%)在 GMT 后实现了原发性瘘管闭合,19 例需要进一步干预以最终愈合。总体愈合率为 65%。瘘管类型具有异质性,以 35 例直肠阴道瘘为主导亚组。瘘管的病因包括放疗、脓肿、产科损伤和医源性/未知,98%的患者有过不成功的修复尝试(平均 3.6 次,范围 1-15 次)。在 60%有造口的患者中(所有患者均有造口,60/60),成功闭合瘘管后可以进行造口关闭。手术后的平均随访时间为 35.9 个月(范围 1-187 个月)。术中无严重并发症发生。25%的患者出现术后并发症:伤口愈合障碍(n=6)、腹直肌坏死(n=3)、切口疝(n=2)、瘢痕组织疼痛(n=2)、缝线肉芽肿(n=1)和骨髓炎(n=1)。3 例患者因瘘管复发(n=2)或粪便失禁(n=1)行第二次腹直肌移位术。

结论

根据作者的经验,GMT 是治疗其他治疗尝试失败后的复杂瘘管的有效治疗选择,因此应在治疗过程中更早考虑。它应被视为主要但不是唯一的步骤,因为在某些情况下,可能需要其他程序才能完全闭合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/307c49a664a8/384_2022_4293_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/d64e0b67744c/384_2022_4293_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/e49b33f96cf7/384_2022_4293_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/8dddd45e194d/384_2022_4293_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/0f734e976d4d/384_2022_4293_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/307c49a664a8/384_2022_4293_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/d64e0b67744c/384_2022_4293_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/e49b33f96cf7/384_2022_4293_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/8dddd45e194d/384_2022_4293_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/0f734e976d4d/384_2022_4293_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a2/9849283/307c49a664a8/384_2022_4293_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Gracilis muscle transposition in complex anorectal fistulas of diverse types and etiologies: long-term results of 60 cases.阔筋膜张肌移位术治疗不同类型和病因的复杂性肛直肠瘘:60 例的长期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 18;38(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04293-6.
2
Gracilis muscle transposition for treatment of recurrent anovaginal, rectovaginal, rectourethral, and pouch-vaginal fistulas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.采用内收肌肌瓣转移术治疗炎症性肠病患者的复发性阴道直肠瘘、直肠阴道瘘、直肠尿道瘘和袋状阴道瘘。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Jan;23(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1918-7. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Gracilis muscle transposition for fistulas between the rectum and urethra or vagina.股薄肌转位术治疗直肠与尿道或阴道瘘
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Sep;49(9):1316-21. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0585-3.
4
Treatment of recurrent rectovaginal/pouch-vaginal fistulas by gracilis muscle transposition - a single center experience.采用腹直肌移位治疗复发性直肠阴道/袋阴道瘘-单中心经验。
J Visc Surg. 2013 Dec;150(6):379-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
5
Clinical outcome and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for fistula closure over a 10-year period.10 年随访研究显示内收肌肌皮瓣转位在瘘口闭合中的临床效果和生活质量
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):569-580. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03825-2. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
6
Gracilis Flap Repair for Reoperative Rectovaginal Fistula.股薄肌皮瓣修复复发性直肠阴道瘘
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Jan 1;66(1):113-117. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002249. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
7
Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of recto-urethral and rectovaginal fistulas: a retrospective analysis of 35 cases.股薄肌植入术治疗直肠尿道瘘和直肠阴道瘘:35例回顾性分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Mar;62(3):352-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.11.067. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
8
Operative results and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for recurrent rectovaginal fistula.股薄肌转位治疗复发性直肠阴道瘘的手术结果及生活质量
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1290-5. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a74700.
9
Operative results, sexual function and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition in complex rectovaginal fistulas.复杂性直肠阴道瘘中股薄肌移位术后的疗效、性功能和生活质量。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;21(12):1429-1437. doi: 10.1111/codi.14741. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
[Prospective study of gracilis muscle repair of complex rectovaginal fistula and rectourethral fistula].[股薄肌修复复杂性直肠阴道瘘和直肠尿道瘘的前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;16(1):52-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: A systematic review of contemporary evidence.低位直肠癌治疗中保留括约肌的手术技术:当代证据的系统评价
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):107525. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.107525.
2
The use of the gracilis flap in colorectal surgery: surgical technique, results, and review of the literature.股薄肌皮瓣在结直肠手术中的应用:手术技术、结果及文献综述。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jun 3;40(1):133. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04928-4.
3
[Rectovaginal fistulas : Differentiated diagnostics and treatment].

本文引用的文献

1
Flap Coverage of Infected Ventricular Assist Devices Influences Patient Outcomes.感染性心室辅助装置的瓣叶覆盖影响患者预后。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S552-S555. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003408. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
Follow-up of obstetric fistula repair using Singapore fasciocutaneous flap and/or gracilis muscle flap.采用新加坡筋膜皮瓣和/或股薄肌瓣修复产科瘘管的随访
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Jan;41(1):246-254. doi: 10.1002/nau.24805. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
Quality of life and associated factors among women with obstetric fistula in Ethiopia.
[直肠阴道瘘:鉴别诊断与治疗]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;95(12):1027-1040. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02151-5. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
埃塞俄比亚产科瘘女性的生活质量及其相关因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01458-3.
4
What is the best method of rectovaginal fistula repair? A 25-year single-center experience.哪种方法是修复直肠阴道瘘的最佳方法?单中心 25 年经验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Sep;25(9):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02475-y. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
5
Gracilis Muscle Interposition for Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: Experience With 119 Consecutive Patients.股薄肌肌间位转移治疗复杂性肛瘘:119 例连续患者的经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jul 1;64(7):881-887. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001964.
6
Clinical outcome and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for fistula closure over a 10-year period.10 年随访研究显示内收肌肌皮瓣转位在瘘口闭合中的临床效果和生活质量
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):569-580. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03825-2. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
Operative results, sexual function and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition in complex rectovaginal fistulas.复杂性直肠阴道瘘中股薄肌移位术后的疗效、性功能和生活质量。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;21(12):1429-1437. doi: 10.1111/codi.14741. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
8
Gracilis muscle transposition for treatment of recurrent anovaginal, rectovaginal, rectourethral, and pouch-vaginal fistulas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.采用内收肌肌瓣转移术治疗炎症性肠病患者的复发性阴道直肠瘘、直肠阴道瘘、直肠尿道瘘和袋状阴道瘘。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Jan;23(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1918-7. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
Gracilis muscle transposition for the treatment of recurrent rectovaginal and pouch-vaginal fistula: is Crohn's disease a risk factor for failure? A prospective cohort study.股薄肌转位术治疗复发性直肠阴道瘘和贮袋阴道瘘:克罗恩病是治疗失败的危险因素吗?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2018 Dec;70(4):485-490. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0558-9. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
10
Surgical Repair of Rectovaginal Fistula Using the Modified Martius Procedure: A Step-by-Step Guide.经阴道直肠阴道瘘修补术采用改良 Martius 手术:分步指南。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May-Jun;25(4):573-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.657. Epub 2017 Sep 6.