• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性心室辅助装置的瓣叶覆盖影响患者预后。

Flap Coverage of Infected Ventricular Assist Devices Influences Patient Outcomes.

机构信息

From the Divisions of Plastic Surgery.

Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S552-S555. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003408. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003408
PMID:36729072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for patients with end-stage cardiac failure awaiting heart transplantation has become increasingly common. However, ventricular assist device-related infections remain a major problem complicating their long-term use. Poor data exist to determine how to manage these infections after operative debridement.

METHODS

Patients who underwent insertion of a ventricular assist device and had a subsequent readmission for LVAD infection at the University of Rochester Medical Center from 2012 to 2022 were identified through accessing the medical records archives of the hospital. Patients were followed retrospectively for an average of 3.2 years. Patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis/disease state, type of ventricular assist device inserted, postoperative day of ventricular assist device infection onset, infectious organism identified at initial washout, infectious organism identified at time of definitive device coverage, timing of coverage procedure after the initial washout for infection, type of flap used for coverage, 90-day complications after definitive coverage, and lifetime return to operating room for infection were reviewed. Comparison analysis with a χ 2 test was used to analyze outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 568 patients admitted with an LVAD-related infection 117 underwent operative debridement. Of these, 34 underwent primary closure, 31 underwent closure with secondary intention (negative pressure wound therapy with split thickness skin grafting), and 52 were closed with a flap (pectoralis, omental, latissimus, or vertical rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap). There was a statistically significant higher incidence of return to the operating room (RTOR) for infection over a lifetime with primary closure compared with secondary intention and flap reconstruction ( P = 0.01, 0.02), but no difference in 90-day complications ( P = 0.76, P = 0.58). Eighty-three patients had a positive culture upon definitive coverage with 24 having a postsurgical complication, 15 of which required lifetime RTOR for infection. Thirty four were closed with negative cultures with 9 having a complication and 4 requiring RTOR for infection. This was not statistically significant for complications or RTOR ( P = 0.79, 0.40). Culture data were further substratified into bacterial cultures (n = 73) versus fungal cultures (n = 10), and there was no statistically significant difference between these compared with complications or RTOR ( P = 0.40, 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Coverage of infected LVADs with locoregional flaps or allowing to granulate using wound vac therapy has a decreased lifetime RTOR for future infections for these patients without increase in 90-day complications. Timing of RTOR should not be impacted by positive cultures provided there is healthy granulation tissue in the wound.

摘要

背景

使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗等待心脏移植的终末期心力衰竭患者已变得越来越普遍。然而,与心室辅助装置相关的感染仍然是一个主要问题,使其长期使用复杂化。目前的数据不足以确定在手术后清创后如何处理这些感染。

方法

通过访问医院的病历档案,确定了 2012 年至 2022 年在罗切斯特大学医学中心接受心室辅助装置植入术并随后因 LVAD 感染再次入院的患者。对患者进行了平均 3.2 年的回顾性随访。患者的人口统计学特征、术前诊断/疾病状态、植入的心室辅助装置类型、心室辅助装置感染发作的术后天数、初次冲洗时鉴定的感染病原体、明确装置覆盖时鉴定的感染病原体、初次冲洗后覆盖程序的时间、用于覆盖的瓣类型、明确覆盖后 90 天的并发症以及终生因感染返回手术室的情况均进行了回顾。使用 χ 2 检验进行了比较分析。

结果

在 568 名因 LVAD 相关感染而入院的患者中,有 117 名患者接受了手术清创。其中,34 例行一期缝合,31 例行二期缝合(负压伤口治疗联合皮片移植),52 例行瓣覆盖(胸大肌、网膜、背阔肌或垂直腹直肌肌皮瓣)。与二期缝合和瓣重建相比,一期缝合的终生感染再次手术率(RTOR)有统计学意义( P = 0.01,0.02),但 90 天并发症无差异( P = 0.76, P = 0.58)。在明确覆盖时,83 例培养阳性,24 例术后并发症,其中 15 例需要终生 RTOR 治疗感染。34 例培养阴性,9 例发生并发症,4 例因感染需要 RTOR。并发症或 RTOR 无统计学意义( P = 0.79,0.40)。进一步对培养数据进行细菌培养(n = 73)和真菌培养(n = 10)的亚组分析,与并发症或 RTOR 相比,差异无统计学意义( P = 0.40,0.39)。

结论

对于这些患者,用局部瓣覆盖感染的 LVAD 或允许使用伤口真空疗法形成肉芽组织,可降低未来感染的终生 RTOR,而 90 天的并发症无增加。只要伤口有健康的肉芽组织,RTOR 就不应受培养阳性的影响。

相似文献

1
Flap Coverage of Infected Ventricular Assist Devices Influences Patient Outcomes.感染性心室辅助装置的瓣叶覆盖影响患者预后。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S552-S555. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003408. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
Plastic Surgery Involvement With Surgical Management of Infected Ventricular Assist Devices Decreased Lifetime Return to Operating Room and 90-Day Infectious Complications.整形手术在感染性心室辅助装置的外科治疗中的介入降低了终生再次手术率和 90 天感染并发症发生率。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 1;92(4S Suppl 2):S200-S203. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003874.
3
Omental transposition flap for salvage of ventricular assist devices.大网膜移位皮瓣用于挽救心室辅助装置
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15;118(4):919-926. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232419.74219.15.
4
Complex wound management in ventricular assist device (VAD) patients: the role of aggressive debridement and vascularized soft tissue coverage.心室辅助装置(VAD)患者的复杂伤口管理:积极清创和带血管蒂软组织覆盖的作用。
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73 Suppl 2:S165-70. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000228.
5
The use of muscle flaps to treat left ventricular assist device infections.使用肌瓣治疗左心室辅助装置感染。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Feb;107(2):364-73. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200102000-00011.
6
Flap coverage for the treatment of exposed left ventricular assist device (LVAD) hardware and intractable LVAD infections.皮瓣覆盖术用于治疗左心室辅助装置(LVAD)硬件外露及难治性LVAD感染。
J Card Surg. 2017 Nov;32(11):732-737. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13230. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
7
Omental and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap coverage after heart transplantation to manage wide left ventricular assist device exposure with pocket infection.心脏移植后采用网膜和腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣覆盖术治疗左心室辅助装置广泛外露伴囊袋感染。
J Artif Organs. 2018 Dec;21(4):466-470. doi: 10.1007/s10047-018-1075-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Pedicled Flap Closure as an Adjunct for Infected Ventricular Assist Devices.带蒂皮瓣封闭术作为感染性心室辅助装置的辅助治疗方法
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6):712-716. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000904.
9
Salvage of infected left ventricular assist device with antibiotic beads.带抗生素珠粒的感染左心室辅助装置的挽救。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan;133(1):28e-38e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436837.03819.3f.
10
Flap Reconstruction for Deep Sternal Wound Infections: Factors Influencing Morbidity and Mortality.皮瓣重建治疗胸骨深部伤口感染:影响发病率和死亡率的因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 May;109(5):1584-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Gracilis muscle transposition in complex anorectal fistulas of diverse types and etiologies: long-term results of 60 cases.阔筋膜张肌移位术治疗不同类型和病因的复杂性肛直肠瘘:60 例的长期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 18;38(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04293-6.