Zhu Kai, Tian Zhao-Min, Bai Jie, Ding Yu
Orthopaedics of TCM Department, the Sixth Medical Center of the General Hospital of People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing 100048, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 Jan 25;36(1):5-11. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.01.002.
To compare the clinical efficacy of full endoscopic lamina fenestration discectomy (Endo-LOVE) with full endoscopic transforaminal approach discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis.
A retrospective analysis of 48 patients with degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis between March 2018 and March 2019 was performed. There were 32 males and 16 females, aged from 60 to 83 years old with an average of (72.9±6.5) years, course of disease ranged from 5 to 16 years with an average of (8.0±2.8) years. The patients were divided into observation group and control group according to surgical approaches. There were 28 cases in observation group, underwent Endo-LOVE surgery;and 20 cases in control group, underwent full endoscopic foraminal approach discectomy. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization day and complications were observed between two groups. Visual analgue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA), Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), lateral crypt angle were compared between two groups. And clinical effects were evaluated by modified Macnab standard.
There was no significant difference in follow-up and operation time between two groups (>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss was from 5 to 15 ml with an average of (8.4±3.6) ml in observation group and 5 to 25 ml with an average of (11.5±5.4) ml in control group. The hospitalization day was from 5 to 8 days with an average of (6.0±1.0) days in observation group and 6 to 9 days with an average (7.2±1.1) days in control group. Intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization day were significantly lower in observation group(<0.05). There were no serious complications in both groups. The VAS, JOA scores, and ODI at 3-month and final follow-up were significantly improved in both groups (<0.05), and observation group was significantly better than control group (<0.05). The skeletal lateral crypt angle and soft lateral crypt angle were significantly greater than the preoperative angle at 3 days postoperatively(<0.05), and observation group was significantly better than control group(<0.05). At the final follow-up, the modified Macnab criteria was used to assess clinical efficacy, in observation group, 22 patients obtained excellent results, 5 good and 1 fair;while 11 excellent, 4 good and 5 fair in control group;the clinical efficacy of observation group was significantly better than that of control group(<0.05).
Both surgical methods are performed under direct vision, with high safety and good clinical efficacy. However, Endo-LOVE enlarged the lateral crypt more fully.
比较全内镜下椎板开窗髓核摘除术(Endo-LOVE)与全内镜下经椎间孔入路髓核摘除术治疗退变性腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症的临床疗效。
回顾性分析2018年3月至2019年3月收治的48例退变性腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症患者。其中男32例,女16例,年龄60~83岁,平均(72.9±6.5)岁,病程5~16年,平均(8.0±2.8)年。根据手术方式将患者分为观察组和对照组。观察组28例,行Endo-LOVE手术;对照组20例,行全内镜下经椎间孔入路髓核摘除术。观察两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数及并发症情况。比较两组视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、日本骨科学会(JOA)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)及侧隐窝角度。并采用改良Macnab标准评价临床疗效。
两组随访时间和手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。观察组术中出血量5~15 ml,平均(8.4±3.6)ml;对照组术中出血量5~25 ml,平均(11.5±5.4)ml。观察组住院天数5~8天,平均(6.0±1.0)天;对照组住院天数6~9天,平均(7.2±1.1)天。观察组术中出血量和住院天数明显低于对照组(<0.05)。两组均无严重并发症发生。两组术后3个月及末次随访时VAS、JOA评分及ODI均较术前明显改善(<0.05),且观察组明显优于对照组(<0.05)。术后3天两组骨性侧隐窝角度和软性侧隐窝角度均明显大于术前(<0.05),且观察组明显优于对照组(<0.05)。末次随访时,采用改良Macnab标准评估临床疗效,观察组优22例,良5例,可1例;对照组优11例,良4例,可5例;观察组临床疗效明显优于对照组(<0.05)。
两种手术方法均在直视下进行,安全性高,临床疗效好。然而,Endo-LOVE能更充分地扩大侧隐窝。