Platt Jodyn E, Solomonides Anthony E, Walker Philip D, Amara Philip S, Richardson Joshua E, Middleton Blackford
University of Michigan Medical School Department of Learning Health Sciences Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Research Institute, NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston Illinois USA.
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Jun 3;7(1):e10314. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10314. eCollection 2023 Jan.
While data repositories are well-established in clinical and research enterprises, knowledge repositories with shareable computable biomedical knowledge (CBK) are relatively new entities to the digital health ecosystem. Trustworthy knowledge repositories are necessary for learning health systems, but the policies, standards, and practices to promote trustworthy CBK artifacts and methods to share, and safely and effectively use them are not well studied.
We conducted an online survey of 24 organizations in the United States known to be involved in the development or deployment of CBK. The aim of the survey was to assess the current policies and practices governing these repositories and to identify best practices. Descriptive statistics methods were applied to data from 13 responding organizations, to identify common practices and policies instantiating the TRUST principles of Transparency, Responsibility, User Focus, Sustainability, and Technology.
All 13 respondents indicated to different degrees adherence to policies that convey TRUST. is conveyed by having policies pertaining to provenance, credentialed contributors, and provision of metadata. Repositories provide knowledge in machine-readable formats, include implementation guidelines, and adhere to standards to convey . Repositories report having functions that enable end-users to verify, search, and filter for knowledge products. Less common TRUST practices are procedures that enable consumers to know about user licensing requirements or query the use of knowledge artifacts. Related to , less than a majority post describe their sustainability plans. Few organizations publicly describe whether patients play any role in their decision-making.
It is essential that knowledge repositories identify and apply a baseline set of criteria to lay a robust foundation for their trustworthiness leading to optimum uptake, and safe, reliable, and effective use to promote sharing of CBK. Identifying current practices suggests a set of desiderata for the CBK ecosystem in its continued evolution.
虽然数据存储库在临床和研究机构中已得到广泛应用,但具有可共享的可计算生物医学知识(CBK)的知识存储库对于数字健康生态系统来说还是相对较新的实体。值得信赖的知识存储库对于学习型健康系统至关重要,但促进可信赖的CBK工件以及共享、安全有效使用这些工件的方法的政策、标准和实践尚未得到充分研究。
我们对美国已知参与CBK开发或部署的24个组织进行了在线调查。该调查的目的是评估管理这些存储库的现行政策和实践,并确定最佳实践。描述性统计方法应用于来自13个回复组织的数据,以确定体现透明度、责任、用户关注、可持续性和技术等TRUST原则的常见实践和政策。
所有13位受访者均表示在不同程度上遵守传达TRUST的政策。通过制定有关出处、有资质的贡献者和元数据提供的政策来传达透明度。存储库以机器可读格式提供知识,包括实施指南,并遵守标准以传达责任。存储库报告具有使最终用户能够验证、搜索和筛选知识产品的功能。不太常见的TRUST实践是使消费者能够了解用户许可要求或查询知识工件使用情况的程序。与可持续性相关的是,不到一半的组织描述了他们的可持续发展计划。很少有组织公开描述患者在其决策中是否发挥任何作用。
知识存储库必须确定并应用一组基线标准,为其可信度奠定坚实基础,以实现最佳采用率,并安全、可靠且有效地用于促进CBK的共享。确定当前实践为CBK生态系统在其持续发展中提出了一系列 desiderata。