Cramer Samuel W, McGovern Robert A, Chen Clark C, Park Michael C
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2023 Jan 11;15:11795735231151830. doi: 10.1177/11795735231151830. eCollection 2023.
We examined the efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) for patients suffering from medically intractable epilepsy. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs - 3 adult RCTs and 1 pediatric RCT) were identified in our comprehensive literature search. Across the 4 studies, high frequency VNS stimulation (frequency >20 Hz) consistently achieved a greater seizure frequency reduction (23.4-33.1%) relative to low frequency VNS stimulation (1 Hz, .6-15.2%). We identified 2 RCTs examining whether the parameters of stimulation influenced seizure control. These studies reported that VNS achieved seizure control comparable to those reported by the first 4 RCTs (22-43% seizure frequency reduction), irrespective of the parameters utilized for VNS stimulation. In terms of VNS associated morbidity, these morbidities were consistently higher in adults who underwent high frequency VNS stimulation (eg dysphonia 37-66%, dyspnea 6-25.3%). However, no such differences were observed in the pediatric population. Moreover, <2% of patients withdrew from the RCTs/prospective studies due to intolerable symptoms. To provide an assessment of how the risks and benefits of VNS impact the patient experience, 1 study assessed the well-being of enrolled patients (as a secondary end point) and found VNS was associated with an overall improvement in well-being. Consistent with this observation, we identified a prospective, non-randomized study that demonstrated improved quality of life for epilepsy patients managed with VNS and best medical practice relative to best medical practice alone. In aggregate, these RCT studies support the efficacy and benefit of VNS as a neuro-modulatory platform in the management of a subset of medically refractory epilepsy patients.
我们研究了迷走神经刺激(VNS)对药物难治性癫痫患者的疗效。在全面的文献检索中,我们确定了四项随机对照试验(RCT,三项成人RCT和一项儿科RCT)。在这四项研究中,相对于低频VNS刺激(1Hz,减少0.6 - 15.2%),高频VNS刺激(频率>20Hz)始终能实现更大程度的癫痫发作频率降低(23.4 - 33.1%)。我们确定了两项研究刺激参数是否影响癫痫控制的RCT。这些研究报告称,无论VNS刺激所采用的参数如何,VNS实现的癫痫控制与前四项RCT报告的结果相当(癫痫发作频率降低22 - 43%)。就VNS相关的发病率而言,接受高频VNS刺激的成年人中这些发病率始终较高(例如,发音障碍37 - 66%,呼吸困难6 - 25.3%)。然而,在儿科人群中未观察到此类差异。此外,<2%的患者因无法耐受的症状退出了RCT/前瞻性研究。为了评估VNS的风险和益处如何影响患者体验,一项研究评估了入组患者的幸福感(作为次要终点),发现VNS与幸福感的总体改善相关。与此观察结果一致,我们确定了一项前瞻性、非随机研究,该研究表明,与仅采用最佳医疗实践相比,采用VNS和最佳医疗实践管理的癫痫患者的生活质量有所改善。总体而言,这些RCT研究支持VNS作为一种神经调节平台在治疗一部分药物难治性癫痫患者中的疗效和益处。