Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Surgery, UTHealth Houston John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Mar;24(2):99-111. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.363. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
It is recognized increasingly that common surgical infections of the peritoneal cavity may be treated with antibiotic agents alone, or source control surgery with short-course antimicrobial therapy. By extension, testable hypotheses have emerged that such infections may not actually be infectious diseases, but rather represent inflammation that can be treated successfully with neither surgery nor antibiotic agents. The aim of this review is to examine extant data to determine which of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (uAA), uncomplicated acute calculous cholecystitis (uACC), or uncomplicated mild acute diverticulitis (umAD) might be amenable to management using supportive therapy alone, consistent with the principles of antimicrobial stewardship. Review of pertinent English-language literature and expert opinion. Only two small trials have examined whether uAA can be managed with observation and supportive therapy alone, one of which is underpowered and was stopped prematurely because of challenging patient recruitment. Data are insufficient to determine the safety and efficacy of non-antibiotic therapy of uAA. Uncomplicated acute calculous cholecystitis is not primarily an infectious disease; infection is a secondary phenomenon. Even when bactibilia is present, there is no high-quality evidence to suggest that mild disease should be treated with antibiotic agents. There is evidence to indicate that antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for urgent/emergency cholecystectomy for uACC, but not in the post-operative period. Uncomplicated mild acute diverticulitis, generally Hinchey 1a or 1b in current nomenclature, does not benefit from antimicrobial agents based on multiple clinical studies. The implication is that umAD is inflammatory and not an infectious disease. Non-antimicrobial management is reasonable. Among the considered disease entities, the evidence is strongest that umAD is not an infectious disease and can be treated without antibiotic agents, intermediate regarding uACC, and lacking for uAA. A plausible hypothesis is that these inflammatory conditions are related to disruption of the normal microbiome, resulting in dysbiosis, which is defined as an imbalance of the natural microflora, especially of the gut, that is believed to contribute to a range of conditions of ill health. As for restorative pre- or probiotic therapy to reconstitute the microbiome, no recommendation can be made in terms of treatment, but it is not recommended for prevention of primary or recurrent disease.
人们越来越认识到,普通的腹腔外科感染可以单独用抗生素治疗,也可以通过控制感染源联合短期抗菌治疗。由此产生了一些可以检验的假设,即这些感染实际上可能不是传染病,而是可以成功地用手术或抗生素以外的方法治疗的炎症。本综述的目的是检查现有的数据,以确定单纯性急性阑尾炎(uAA)、单纯性急性结石性胆囊炎(uACC)或单纯性轻度急性憩室炎(umAD)中哪些可能适合仅采用支持性治疗进行管理,这符合抗菌药物管理的原则。 对相关英文文献和专家意见进行了回顾。 只有两项小型试验研究了单纯性急性阑尾炎是否可以通过观察和支持性治疗来治疗,其中一项试验因入组困难而提前终止,且该试验的样本量不足。目前还没有足够的数据来确定非抗生素治疗 uAA 的安全性和有效性。单纯性急性结石性胆囊炎并非主要的传染病;感染是一种继发现象。即使存在细菌血症,也没有高质量的证据表明轻度疾病应该用抗生素治疗。有证据表明,对于 uACC 的紧急/急诊胆囊切除术需要预防性使用抗生素,但在术后则不需要。根据多项临床研究,单纯性轻度急性憩室炎(当前命名为 Hinchey 1a 或 1b)不需要使用抗菌药物。这意味着 umAD 是炎症性的,而不是传染病。非抗菌治疗是合理的。 在考虑的疾病实体中,umAD 最不可能是传染病,不需要使用抗生素,uACC 处于中等程度,而 uAA 则缺乏相关证据。一个合理的假设是,这些炎症性疾病与正常微生物群的破坏有关,导致菌群失调,即正常微生物群的失衡,尤其是肠道微生物群的失衡,这被认为与一系列健康状况不佳有关。至于恢复性的预或益生菌治疗来重建微生物群,我们不能推荐这种治疗方法,但也不推荐用于预防原发性或复发性疾病。