Medical Student Research Program, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
APMIS. 2023 Apr;131(4):170-179. doi: 10.1111/apm.13295. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
Hardware implanted during primary total joint arthroplasty carries a serious risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The formation of bacterial biofilms, which are highly tolerant of antibiotics and host immunity, is recognized as being a major barrier to treatment. It is not known whether some components and their surface features are more prone to biofilm than others. This study attempted to map biofilm on different components and features of orthopedic hardware recovered during revision. Implant surface culture (ISC) was used on 53 components from 14 hip and knee revisions. ISC achieves a thin agar coating over components, followed by incubation and observation for colony outgrowth over 9 days. Recovered organisms were identified by selective culture and 16s rRNA sequencing. Outcomes were compared with clinical culturing and PJI diagnosis based on 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. ISC paralleled clinical culturing with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 57.1%. When compared to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, sensitivity remained at 100% while specificity was 80%. Biofilm accumulation was patchy and heterogeneous throughout different prostheses, though notably the non-articulating surfaces between the tibial tray and polyethylene insert showed consistent growth. On individual components, ridges and edges consistently harbored biofilm, while growth elsewhere was case dependent. ISC successfully identified microbial growth with high sensitivity while also revealing that biofilm growth was commonly localized to particular locations. Understanding where biofilm formation occurs most often on implanted hardware will help guide debridement, retention choices, and implant design.
在初次全关节置换术中植入的硬件会带来严重的假体周围关节感染(PJI)风险。细菌生物膜的形成被认为是治疗的主要障碍,因为生物膜对抗生素和宿主免疫具有高度耐受性。目前尚不清楚某些组件及其表面特征是否比其他组件更容易形成生物膜。本研究试图在翻修过程中回收的骨科硬件的不同组件和特征上绘制生物膜。对 14 例髋关节和膝关节翻修术中的 53 个部件进行了植入物表面培养(ISC)。ISC 在部件上涂覆一层薄薄的琼脂涂层,然后孵育并观察 9 天内的菌落生长。通过选择性培养和 16s rRNA 测序鉴定回收的微生物。将结果与临床培养和基于 2013 年肌肉骨骼感染学会标准的 PJI 诊断进行比较。ISC 与临床培养具有 100%的敏感性和 57.1%的特异性相平行。与肌肉骨骼感染学会标准相比,敏感性仍为 100%,特异性为 80%。生物膜在不同假体中的积累是斑驳和不均匀的,尽管胫骨托和聚乙烯插入物之间的非关节表面的生物膜生长一致。在单个组件上,脊和边缘始终存在生物膜,而其他地方的生长则取决于具体情况。ISC 成功地以高灵敏度识别微生物生长,同时还表明生物膜生长通常局限于特定位置。了解植入硬件上生物膜形成最常发生的位置将有助于指导清创、保留选择和植入物设计。