• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 TeenHITSS 以评估青少年人群中的虐待儿童情况。

Validating the TeenHITSS to Assess Child Abuse in Adolescent Populations.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2023 Jan;55(1):12-19. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.55.203565.

DOI:10.22454/FamMed.55.203565
PMID:36656882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10681348/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to establish the psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy of the Teen Hurt-Insult-Threaten-Scream-Sex (TeenHITSS), a 5-item measure used to screen adolescents for family violence in clinical settings.

METHODS

Study participants included 251 adolescent participants (n=197 not at-risk subsample; n=56 at-risk subsample), recruited from ambulatory care clinics, a medical center at-risk referral clinic, and area shelters. Participants completed a cross-sectional survey, including the TeenHITSS and Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC) questionnaires. We calculated internal reliability, validity, and sensitivity and specificity for the full sample and both subsamples for each screening instrument.

RESULTS

Concurrent validity between the TeenHITSS and CTSPC was strong (r=.71, P<.000). We determined an optimal cutpoint based on sensitivity and specificity for correctly identifying abuse victims as a score of one or greater on the TeenHITSS. The TeenHITSS also proved slightly superior to the CTSPC in differentiating between victims and nonvictims of adolescent abuse (AUC=.79 vs .73, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The TeenHITSS screening tool performed as well as the CTSPC in correctly classifying at-risk and not-at-risk teenagers and offers much greater utility to providers by supplying an actionable cut score. The findings of this study suggest that TeenHITSS is a valid and reliable tool to screen for physical and sexual abuse in children ages 13 years and older in clinical settings and can help health care providers detect adolescent abuse and initiate intervention and prevention of future abuse.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确立青少年伤害-侮辱-威胁-尖叫-性(TeenHITSS)的心理测量学特性和诊断准确性,这是一种用于在临床环境中筛查青少年家庭暴力的 5 项测量工具。

方法

研究参与者包括 251 名青少年参与者(n=197 无风险亚组;n=56 风险亚组),他们来自门诊诊所、医疗中心风险转介诊所和地区避难所。参与者完成了一项横断面调查,包括 TeenHITSS 和父母-子女冲突策略量表(CTSPC)问卷。我们计算了全样本和两个亚组的每个筛查工具的内部可靠性、有效性、敏感性和特异性。

结果

TeenHITSS 和 CTSPC 之间的同时效度很强(r=.71,P<.000)。我们根据 TeenHITSS 上得分大于等于 1 的正确识别受虐受害者的敏感性和特异性确定了最佳截断点。与 CTSPC 相比,TeenHITSS 在区分青少年受虐受害者和非受害者方面也略有优势(AUC=.79 与.73 相比,分别)。

结论

TeenHITSS 筛查工具在正确分类高危和非高危青少年方面与 CTSPC 一样有效,并通过提供可操作的截断分数,为提供者提供了更大的实用性。本研究的结果表明,在临床环境中,TeenHITSS 是一种有效且可靠的工具,可以筛查 13 岁及以上儿童的身体和性虐待,并可以帮助医疗保健提供者发现青少年虐待,并启动干预和预防未来的虐待。

相似文献

1
Validating the TeenHITSS to Assess Child Abuse in Adolescent Populations.验证 TeenHITSS 以评估青少年人群中的虐待儿童情况。
Fam Med. 2023 Jan;55(1):12-19. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.55.203565.
2
PedHITSS: A Screening Tool to Detect Childhood Abuse in Clinical Settings.儿童虐待筛查工具(PedHITSS):一种在临床环境中检测儿童虐待情况的筛查工具。
Fam Med. 2018 Nov;50(10):763-769. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.778329.
3
Assessing psychological and physical abuse from children's perspective: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the picture-based, modularized child-report version of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale - Revised (CTSPC-R).从儿童视角评估心理和身体虐待:基于图片的、模块化的儿童报告版父母-儿童冲突策略量表修订版(CTSPC-R)的因子结构和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):e0205401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205401. eCollection 2018.
4
Validation of the HITS domestic violence screening tool with males.针对男性群体的HITS家庭暴力筛查工具的验证
Fam Med. 2005 Mar;37(3):193-8.
5
Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Conflict Tactics Scales: Parent-child Version (CTSPC) used to identify child abuse.用于识别儿童虐待的葡萄牙语版冲突策略量表:亲子版(CTSPC)的心理测量特性。
Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Mar;22(3):503-15. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000300005. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
6
[A study on the construct validity of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale (CTSPC) in an urban population in Northeast Brazil].[巴西东北部城市人口中亲子冲突策略量表(CTSPC)的结构效度研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Nov;27(11):2215-26. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011001100015.
7
Adaptation and psychometric properties of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool for use in trials (ICAST-Trial) among South African adolescents and their primary caregivers.南非青少年及其主要照顾者中用于试验的 ISPCAN 儿童虐待筛查工具(ICAST-Trial)的适应和心理测量特性。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Aug;82:45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Adaptation and validation of the parent-child conflict tactics scale for use in Sri Lanka.适用于斯里兰卡的亲子冲突策略量表的改编与验证。
Ceylon Med J. 2005 Mar;50(1):11-4. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v50i1.1582.
9
The use of the Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory in the general population in Finland.简短儿童虐待可能性量表在芬兰普通人群中的应用。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):128-134. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1571002. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
The use of the brief child abuse potential inventory in the general population in Finland.在芬兰普通人群中使用简短儿童虐待倾向量表。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):249-255. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608629. Epub 2019 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Predictive Validity of Risk Assessment Tools in Child Health and Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis.评估儿童健康与福祉风险评估工具的预测效度:一项荟萃分析。
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 7;12(4):478. doi: 10.3390/children12040478.

本文引用的文献

1
Bullying in children: impact on child health.儿童欺凌:对儿童健康的影响。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Mar 11;5(1):e000939. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000939. eCollection 2021.
2
Longitudinal Relations among Adolescent Risk Behavior, Family Cohesion, Violence Exposure, and Mental Health in a National Sample.青少年风险行为、家庭凝聚力、暴力暴露与心理健康的纵向关系:全国样本研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Nov;48(11):1455-1469. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00691-y.
3
An RCT of Dating Matters: Effects on Teen Dating Violence and Relationship Behaviors.约会 Matters 的 RCT:对青少年约会暴力和关系行为的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.022. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Every child, every time: hospital-wide child abuse screening increases awareness and state reporting.每一个孩子,每一次:全院范围的儿童虐待筛查提高了意识并增加了向州政府的报告。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Jul;35(7):773-778. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04485-2. Epub 2019 May 21.
5
Interventions to Prevent Child Maltreatment: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.预防儿童虐待的干预措施:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2122-2128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17772.
6
PedHITSS: A Screening Tool to Detect Childhood Abuse in Clinical Settings.儿童虐待筛查工具(PedHITSS):一种在临床环境中检测儿童虐待情况的筛查工具。
Fam Med. 2018 Nov;50(10):763-769. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.778329.
7
Characteristics of child physical and sexual abuse as predictors of psychopathology.儿童身体和性虐待的特征对精神病理学的预测作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Dec;86:167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Assessing psychological and physical abuse from children's perspective: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the picture-based, modularized child-report version of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale - Revised (CTSPC-R).从儿童视角评估心理和身体虐待:基于图片的、模块化的儿童报告版父母-儿童冲突策略量表修订版(CTSPC-R)的因子结构和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):e0205401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205401. eCollection 2018.
9
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Screening Children for Abuse and Neglect: A Review of the Literature.筛查受虐待和忽视的儿童:文献综述
J Forensic Nurs. 2017 Jan/Mar;13(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000136.