• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于 RFID 的跟踪系统对雌性群居实验室小鼠进行多项二选一测试,对富集物进行评分。

Rating enrichment items by female group-housed laboratory mice in multiple binary choice tests using an RFID-based tracking system.

机构信息

German Center for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.

Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute of Animal Welfare, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0278709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278709. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278709
PMID:36656912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9851564/
Abstract

Laboratory mice spend most of their lives in cages, not experiments, so improving housing conditions is a first-choice approach to improving their welfare. Despite the increasing popularity of enrichment, little is known about the benefits from an animal perspective. For a detailed analysis, we categorized enrichment items according to their prospective use into the categories 'structural', 'housing', and 'foraging'. In homecage-based multiple binary choice tests 12 female C57BL/6J mice chose between enrichment items within the respective categories over a 46-hour period. A new analyzing method combined the binary decisions and ranked the enrichment items within each category by calculating worth values and consensus errors. Although there was no unequivocal ranking that was true in its entire rank order for all individual mice, certain elements (e.g. lattice ball, second plane) were always among the top positions. Overall, a high consensus error in ranking positions reflects strong individual differences in preferences which could not be resolved due to the relatively small sample size. However, individual differences in the preference for enrichment items highlights the importance of a varied enrichment approach, as there does not seem to be one item that satisfies the wants and needs of all individuals to the same degree. An enrichment concept, in which the needs of the animals are central, contributes to a more specific refinement of housing conditions.

摘要

实验小鼠一生中的大部分时间都在笼子里度过,而不是在实验中,因此改善饲养条件是提高其福利的首选方法。尽管丰容越来越受欢迎,但从动物的角度来看,其益处却知之甚少。为了进行详细的分析,我们根据预期用途将丰容物品分为“结构性”、“住房”和“觅食”三类。在基于家庭笼的多项二元选择测试中,12 只雌性 C57BL/6J 小鼠在 46 小时内选择了各自类别的丰容物品。一种新的分析方法将二元决策结合起来,并通过计算价值值和共识误差对每个类别的丰容物品进行排名。尽管对于所有个体老鼠来说,没有一个明确的排名是完全正确的,但某些元素(例如格子球、第二平面)总是处于前列。总的来说,排名位置的共识误差较高反映了个体偏好存在强烈差异,由于样本量相对较小,这些差异无法得到解决。然而,对丰容物品的偏好存在个体差异,突出了采用多样化丰容方法的重要性,因为似乎没有一种物品能够以相同的程度满足所有个体的需求和愿望。以动物需求为核心的丰容概念有助于更具体地改善饲养条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec03/9851564/61d9db64a580/pone.0278709.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec03/9851564/7679bc8d5f12/pone.0278709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec03/9851564/dd9f97b1bbc7/pone.0278709.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec03/9851564/61d9db64a580/pone.0278709.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec03/9851564/7679bc8d5f12/pone.0278709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec03/9851564/dd9f97b1bbc7/pone.0278709.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec03/9851564/61d9db64a580/pone.0278709.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Rating enrichment items by female group-housed laboratory mice in multiple binary choice tests using an RFID-based tracking system.使用基于 RFID 的跟踪系统对雌性群居实验室小鼠进行多项二选一测试,对富集物进行评分。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0278709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278709. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of different types of enrichment - their usage and effect on home cage behavior in female mice.评价不同类型的丰容——它们在雌性小鼠的笼内行为中的使用及其效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261876. eCollection 2021.
3
Laboratory animal welfare: cage enrichment and mouse behaviour.实验动物福利:笼舍环境优化与小鼠行为
Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):821-2. doi: 10.1038/432821a.
4
Structural enrichment for laboratory mice: exploring the effects of novelty and complexity.实验室小鼠的结构丰富化:探索新奇性和复杂性的影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Sep 29;10:1207332. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1207332. eCollection 2023.
5
The amount of cage bedding preferred by female BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice.雌性BALB/c和C57BL/6小鼠偏好的笼内垫料量。
Lab Anim (NY). 2015 Jan;44(1):17-22. doi: 10.1038/laban.659.
6
Mixed-strain housing for female C57BL/6, DBA/2, and BALB/c mice: validating a split-plot design that promotes refinement and reduction.用于雌性C57BL/6、DBA/2和BALB/c小鼠的混合品系饲养:验证一种促进优化和减少的裂区设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jan 27;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0113-7.
7
The Behavioral Effects of Single Housing and Environmental Enrichment on Adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio).单居饲养和环境富集对成年斑马鱼(Danio rerio)行为的影响
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 May;54(3):280-5.
8
Effects of temporary access to environmental enrichment on measures of laboratory mouse welfare.临时获得环境丰容对实验小鼠福利测量指标的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65480-9.
9
Nesting material as environmental enrichment has no adverse effects on behavior and physiology of laboratory mice.作为环境富集物的营巢材料对实验小鼠的行为和生理没有不良影响。
Physiol Behav. 1997 Nov;62(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00232-1.
10
Enrichment Preferences of Singly Housed Zebrafish ().独居斑马鱼的富集偏好()。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020 Mar 1;59(2):148-155. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000078. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing preference testing in humans and animals.推进人类和动物的偏好测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 6;57(7):193. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02668-5.
2
Choice-based severity scale (CSS): assessing the relative severity of procedures from a laboratory animal's perspective.基于选择的严重度评分(CSS):从实验动物的角度评估程序的相对严重度。
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 17;12:e17300. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17300. eCollection 2024.
3
A systematic review of the development and application of home cage monitoring in laboratory mice and rats.实验室小鼠和大鼠笼内监测的发展和应用的系统评价。

本文引用的文献

1
Determining the value of preferred goods based on consumer demand in a home-cage based test for mice.基于基于笼内测试的消费者需求确定小鼠偏好商品的价值。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):751-766. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01813-8. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Evaluation of different types of enrichment - their usage and effect on home cage behavior in female mice.评价不同类型的丰容——它们在雌性小鼠的笼内行为中的使用及其效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261876. eCollection 2021.
3
O mouse, where art thou? The Mouse Position Surveillance System (MoPSS)-an RFID-based tracking system.
BMC Biol. 2023 Nov 13;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01751-7.
4
Radio frequency identification technology reduce intravenous thrombolysis time in acute ischemic stroke.射频识别技术可减少急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓时间。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288207. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation of different types of enrichment - their usage and effect on home cage behavior in female mice.评价不同类型的丰容——它们在雌性小鼠的笼内行为中的使用及其效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261876. eCollection 2021.
鼠标,你在哪里?基于 RFID 的跟踪系统——鼠标位置监控系统(MoPSS)。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):676-689. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01593-7. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
The standardization fallacy.标准化谬误。
Nat Methods. 2021 Jan;18(1):5-7. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01036-9.
5
It is time for an empirically informed paradigm shift in animal research.动物研究领域进行基于实证的范式转变的时候到了。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020 Nov;21(11):660. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0369-0.
6
Impulse for animal welfare outside the experiment.实验之外的动物福利推动因素。
Lab Anim. 2020 Apr;54(2):150-158. doi: 10.1177/0023677219891754. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Effects of Cage Enrichment on Behavior, Welfare and Outcome Variability in Female Mice.笼内丰富环境对雌性小鼠行为、福利及结果变异性的影响
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 26;12:232. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00232. eCollection 2018.
8
An assessment of touchscreens for testing primate food preferences and valuations.触屏在灵长类动物食物偏好和价值评估测试中的应用评估
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):639-650. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1065-0.
9
Laboratory mouse housing conditions can be improved using common environmental enrichment without compromising data.实验室小鼠的饲养条件可以通过常见的环境丰容来改善,而不会影响数据。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 16;16(4):e2005019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005019. eCollection 2018 Apr.
10
Unit of analysis issues in laboratory-based research.基于实验室的研究中的分析单位问题。
Elife. 2018 Jan 10;7:e32486. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32486.