Luo Xiaohui, Ge Yan, Qu Weina
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Apr;183:106968. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.106968. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
Although a large number of studies have examined the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and driving behaviors, consistent evidence for their relationships is still lacking. The main purpose of this study was to systematically review the relationships between the Big Five personality traits and various driving behaviors with different intentions (including risky, aggressive, and positive driving behaviors) through a meta-analysis. A total of 34 articles met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The results showed that risky and aggressive driving behaviors were negatively associated with conscientiousness (r = -0.21; r = -0.26), agreeableness (r = -0.23; r = -0.37), and openness (r = -0.08; r = -0.07), positively associated with neuroticism (r = 0.11; r = 0.26), and nonsignificantly associated with extraversion (r = 0.06; r = -0.06). Positive driving behaviors were positively associated with conscientiousness (r = 0.30), agreeableness (r = 0.32) and openness (r = 0.20) but nonsignificantly associated with extraversion (r = 0.08) and neuroticism (r = -0.10). In addition, the association between the Big Five personality traits and driving behaviors could be moderated by age, gender and type of personality measure. In conclusion, this study contributes to the literature by quantitatively synthesizing existing findings and reconciling previous debates on the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and driving behaviors. From a practical perspective, our findings provide valuable insights into driver selection and screening, policy development, and safety intervention design.
尽管大量研究考察了大五人格特质与驾驶行为之间的关系，但仍缺乏关于它们之间关系的一致性证据。本研究的主要目的是通过荟萃分析系统回顾大五人格特质与具有不同意图的各种驾驶行为（包括危险驾驶、攻击性驾驶和积极驾驶行为）之间的关系。共有34篇文章符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。结果表明，危险驾驶和攻击性驾驶行为与尽责性（r = -0.21；r = -0.26）、宜人性（r = -0.23；r = -0.37）和开放性（r = -0.08；r = -0.07）呈负相关，与神经质呈正相关（r = 0.11；r = 0.26），与外向性无显著相关性（r = 0.06；r = -0.06）。积极驾驶行为与尽责性（r = 0.30）、宜人性（r = 0.32）和开放性（r = 0.20）呈正相关，但与外向性（r = 0.08）和神经质（r = -0.10）无显著相关性。此外，大五人格特质与驾驶行为之间的关联可能受到年龄、性别和人格测量类型的调节。总之，本研究通过定量综合现有研究结果并调和先前关于大五人格特质与驾驶行为之间关系的争论，为该领域文献做出了贡献。从实践角度来看，我们的研究结果为驾驶员选拔与筛查、政策制定以及安全干预设计提供了有价值的见解。
