Suppr超能文献

人格特质对驾驶风格的影响:多维驾驶风格量表在中国样本中的心理测量学适应。

Effect of personality traits on driving style: Psychometric adaption of the multidimensional driving style inventory in a Chinese sample.

机构信息

CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China.

Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0202126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202126. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Driving style is an important factor in driving psychology, which is useful for effectively evaluating driving behaviors. Exploring driving style in a Chinese sample could help understand the overall situation of Chinese drivers. This study aims to develop a measurement of driving style fit for the Chinese situation and to validate the validity and reliability of this scale. In this study, 296 drivers from China completed the Chinese version of the multidimensional driving style inventory (MDSI), the Big Five Inventory (BFI), and the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) as well as several questions about socio-demographic information. After testing the assumed structure by a confirmatory factor analysis, and adjusting the structure, a brief version of Chinese version of MDSI with twelve items categorized into four driving styles, namely, risky style, angry- high-velocity style, careful style and anxious style was revised. The validity and reliability of the scales were acceptable. The results showed that driving styles were closely correlated with self-reported driving behaviors. Specifically, risky style, angry- high-velocity style, and anxious style are all positively associated with dangerous driving behaviors. Meanwhile, careful style was positively associated with positive driving behaviors and negatively correlated with dangerous driving behaviors. Anxious was also found to be negatively associated with fines. For personality, we found a positive relationship between risky, angry- high-velocity, careful and anxious styles and the personality traits that often have negative effects on driving, such as extraversion and neuroticism. Meanwhile, these three styles were negatively correlated with conscientiousness and agreeableness in general. In addition, careful style was positively correlated with conscientiousness and agreeableness. The current study shows convincing evidence for the validity and reliability of the brief MDSI-C and develops a useful tool for identify the driving style of Chinese drivers for future research and relevant departments of road safety.

摘要

驾驶风格是驾驶心理学中的一个重要因素,对于有效评估驾驶行为很有用。探索中国样本中的驾驶风格有助于了解中国驾驶员的整体情况。本研究旨在开发一种适合中国情况的驾驶风格测量方法,并验证该量表的有效性和可靠性。在这项研究中,296 名来自中国的驾驶员完成了多维驾驶风格量表(MDSI)的中文版、大五人格量表(BFI)、驾驶员行为问卷(DBQ)以及一些关于社会人口统计学信息的问题。在通过验证性因素分析检验假设结构,并调整结构后,修订了一个包含 12 个项目的中文版 MDSI 简短版本,分为四种驾驶风格,即冒险风格、愤怒-高速风格、谨慎风格和焦虑风格。该量表的效度和信度是可接受的。结果表明,驾驶风格与自我报告的驾驶行为密切相关。具体而言,冒险、愤怒-高速和焦虑风格都与危险驾驶行为呈正相关。同时,谨慎风格与积极驾驶行为呈正相关,与危险驾驶行为呈负相关。焦虑也与罚款呈负相关。对于人格,我们发现冒险、愤怒-高速、谨慎和焦虑风格与外向和神经质等经常对驾驶产生负面影响的人格特质呈正相关。同时,这三种风格与一般的责任心和宜人性呈负相关。此外,谨慎风格与责任心和宜人性呈正相关。本研究为简短 MDSI-C 的有效性和可靠性提供了令人信服的证据,并为未来的研究和道路安全相关部门开发了一种识别中国驾驶员驾驶风格的有用工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Korean translation and validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory.多维驾驶风格量表的韩语翻译与验证
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 29;11(3):e42344. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42344. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
3
Driving safety: Investigating the cognitive foundations of accident prevention.驾驶安全:探究事故预防的认知基础。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 21;9(11):e21355. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21355. eCollection 2023 Nov.

本文引用的文献

4
Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire.新简短工作压力问卷简版的编制
Ind Health. 2014;52(6):535-40. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
7
Driving styles and their associations with personality and motivation.驾驶风格及其与个性和动机的关联。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
8
The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving.年龄、性别和态度对驾驶自我调节的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.022. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
10
Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?道路上的错误和违规:真正的区别?
Ergonomics. 1990 Oct-Nov;33(10-11):1315-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925335.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验