Suppr超能文献

异常锁骨下动脉和 Kommerell 憩室治疗的当代结果。

Contemporary outcomes after treatment of aberrant subclavian artery and Kommerell's diverticulum.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2023 May;77(5):1339-1348.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aberrant subclavian artery (ASA) and Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) are rare vascular anomalies that may be associated with lifestyle-limiting and life-threatening complications. The aim of this study is to report contemporary outcomes after invasive treatment of ASA/KD using a large international dataset.

METHODS

Patients who underwent treatment for ASA/KD (2000-2020) were identified through the Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium, a multi-institutional collaboration to investigate uncommon vascular disorders. We report the early and mid-term clinical outcomes including stroke and mortality, technical success, and other operative outcomes including reintervention rates, patency, and endoleak.

RESULTS

Overall, 285 patients were identified during the study period. The mean patient age was 57 years; 47% were female and 68% presented with symptoms. A right-sided arch was present in 23%. The mean KD diameter was 47.4 mm (range, 13.0-108.0 mm). The most common indication for treatment was symptoms (59%), followed by aneurysm size (38%). The most common symptom reported was dysphagia (44%). A ruptured KD was treated in 4.2% of cases, with a mean diameter of 43.9 mm (range, 18.0-100.0 mm). An open procedure was performed in 101 cases (36%); the most common approach was ASA ligation with subclavian transposition. An endovascular or hybrid approach was performed in 184 patients (64%); the most common approach was thoracic endograft and carotid-subclavian bypass. A staged operative strategy was employed more often than single setting repair (55% vs 45%). Compared with endovascular or hybrid approach, those in the open procedure group were more likely to be younger (49 years vs 61 years; P < .0001), female (64% vs 36%; P < .0001), and symptomatic (85% vs 59%; P < .0001). Complete or partial symptomatic relief at 1 year after intervention was 82.6%. There was no association between modality of treatment and symptom relief (open 87.2% vs endovascular or hybrid approach 78.9%; P = .13). After the intervention, 11 subclavian occlusions (4.5%) occurred; 3 were successfully thrombectomized resulting in a primary and secondary patency of 95% and 96%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 39 months. Among the 33 reinterventions (12%), the majority were performed for endoleak (36%), and more reinterventions occurred in the endovascular or hybrid approach than open procedure group (15% vs 6%; P = .02). The overall survival rate was 87.3% at a median follow-up of 41 months. The 30-day stroke and death rates were 4.2% and 4.9%, respectively. Urgent or emergent presentation was independently associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 19.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-116.6), overall mortality (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.2-11.2) and intraoperative complications (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 2.8-25.1). Females had a higher risk of reintervention (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.5). At an aneurysm size of 44.4 mm, receiver operator characteristic curve analysis suggested that 60% of patients would have symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of ASA/KD can be performed safely with low rates of mortality, stroke and reintervention and high rates of symptomatic relief, regardless of the repair strategy. Symptomatic and urgent operations were associated with worse outcomes in general, and female gender was associated with a higher likelihood of reintervention. Given the worse overall outcomes when symptomatic and the inherent risk of rupture, consideration of repair at 40 mm is reasonable in most patients. ASA/KD can be repaired in asymptomatic patients with excellent outcomes and young healthy patients may be considered better candidates for open approaches versus endovascular or hybrid modalities, given the lower likelihood of reintervention and lower early mortality rate.

摘要

目的

异常锁骨下动脉(ASA)和 Kommerell 憩室(KD)是罕见的血管异常,可能与生活方式受限和危及生命的并发症相关。本研究的目的是通过大型国际数据集报告使用侵入性治疗 ASA/KD 的当代结果。

方法

通过血管低频疾病联盟(一个多机构合作组织,旨在研究罕见的血管疾病)确定了 2000 年至 2020 年间接受 ASA/KD 治疗的患者。我们报告了早期和中期临床结果,包括卒中发生率和死亡率、技术成功率以及其他手术结果,包括再介入率、通畅率和内漏。

结果

研究期间共确定了 285 例患者。患者平均年龄为 57 岁;47%为女性,68%有症状。23%为右侧弓。KD 的平均直径为 47.4mm(范围为 13.0-108.0mm)。治疗最常见的指征是症状(59%),其次是动脉瘤大小(38%)。报告的最常见症状是吞咽困难(44%)。4.2%的患者为破裂的 KD,平均直径为 43.9mm(范围为 18.0-100.0mm)。101 例(36%)患者行开放手术;最常见的方法是锁骨下动脉结扎和锁骨下动脉转位。184 例(64%)患者行血管内或杂交手术;最常见的方法是胸主动脉瘤和颈动脉-锁骨下旁路。分期手术策略比单一设定修复更常用(55%比 45%)。与血管内或杂交手术相比,开放手术组的患者更年轻(49 岁比 61 岁;P<0.0001)、女性(64%比 36%;P<0.0001)和有症状(85%比 59%;P<0.0001)。干预后 1 年完全或部分症状缓解率为 82.6%。治疗方式与症状缓解无相关性(开放组 87.2%,血管内或杂交组 78.9%;P=0.13)。干预后,11 例锁骨下动脉闭塞(4.5%)发生;3 例成功进行了血栓切除术,分别导致原发性和继发性通畅率为 95%和 96%,中位随访时间为 39 个月。在 33 例再介入(12%)中,大多数是为了处理内漏(36%),血管内或杂交手术组比开放手术组的再介入率更高(15%比 6%;P=0.02)。在中位随访 41 个月时,总体生存率为 87.3%。30 天的卒中发生率和死亡率分别为 4.2%和 4.9%。紧急或紧急就诊与 30 天死亡率(优势比[OR],19.8;95%置信区间[CI],3.3-116.6)、总死亡率(OR,3.6;95%CI,1.2-11.2)和术中并发症(OR,8.3;95%CI,2.8-25.1)的风险增加独立相关。女性再介入的风险更高(OR,2.6;95%CI,1.0-6.5)。在动脉瘤大小为 44.4mm 时,受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,60%的患者会有症状。

结论

无论修复策略如何,治疗 ASA/KD 均可安全进行,死亡率、卒中发生率和再介入率较低,症状缓解率较高。一般来说,有症状和紧急手术与更差的结果相关,女性与更高的再介入可能性相关。鉴于有症状时的整体结果较差,以及破裂的固有风险,在大多数患者中,考虑在 40mm 时进行修复是合理的。无症状患者可以进行 ASA/KD 修复,且结果良好,年轻健康的患者可能更适合接受开放手术,而不是血管内或杂交手术,因为再介入率和早期死亡率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验