• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017 年美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会在妊娠后半期的血压分类-对其与不良妊娠结局关系的系统评价。

The 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories in the second half of pregnancy-a systematic review of their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

机构信息

Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;229(2):101-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.013
PMID:36657559
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A relationship between the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure thresholds and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been reported, but few studies have explored the diagnostic test properties of these cutoffs when used within pregnancy.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases were searched (2017-2021) for measurements of blood pressure in pregnancy at >20 weeks, classified according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association criteria, and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. Blood pressure was categorized as "normal" (systolic blood pressure of <120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of <80 mm Hg), "elevated blood pressure" (systolic blood pressure of 120-129 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of <80 mm Hg), "stage 1 hypertension" (systolic blood pressure of 130-139 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 mm Hg), and "stage 2 hypertension" (systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies recording blood pressure at or above 20 weeks gestation were included.

METHODS

Meta-analyses were used to investigate the strength of the association between blood pressure cutoffs and adverse outcomes, and the diagnostic test properties were calculated accounting for gestation.

RESULTS

There were 12 included studies. The American College of Cardiology or American Heart Association blood pressure categories were determined from peak blood pressures at any point from 20 weeks of gestation and at specific gestational ages (20-27, 28-32, or 33-36 weeks of gestation), as available. A higher (vs normal) blood pressure category was consistently associated with adverse outcomes. The strength of association between blood pressure categories and adverse outcomes was the greatest with "stage 2 hypertension" (blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg). The results were similar when peak blood pressure was reported either at any time from 20 weeks of gestation or within gestational age groups (as above). No blood pressure category was useful as a diagnostic "rule-out test" for adverse outcomes, as all negative likelihood ratios were ≥0.2. Only "stage 2 hypertension" was useful as a "rule in-test," with positive likelihood ratios of ≥5.0, for maximum blood pressure at >20 weeks of gestation for preeclampsia and blood pressure within any gestational age groups for preeclampsia, eclampsia, stroke, maternal death, and stillbirth.

CONCLUSION

From 20 weeks of gestation, blood pressure thresholds of 140 mm Hg (systolic) and 90 mm Hg (diastolic) were useful in identifying women at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, irrespective of the specific gestational age at blood pressure measurement. Lowering the blood pressure threshold for abnormal blood pressure at >20 weeks of gestation would not assist clinicians in identifying women at heightened maternal or perinatal risk. No American College of Cardiology or American Heart Association blood pressure threshold can provide reassurance that women are unlikely to develop adverse outcomes.

摘要

目的

已有研究报告称,2017 年美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会的血压阈值与不良妊娠结局之间存在关联,但很少有研究探讨这些切点在妊娠期间的诊断测试性能。

资料来源

检索电子数据库(2017-2021 年),以获取超过 20 周妊娠时的血压测量值,根据 2017 年美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会的标准进行分类,并研究其与妊娠结局的关系。血压分为“正常”(收缩压<120mmHg 和舒张压<80mmHg)、“血压升高”(收缩压 120-129mmHg 和舒张压<80mmHg)、“1 期高血压”(收缩压 130-139mmHg 和/或舒张压 80-89mmHg)和“2 期高血压”(收缩压≥140mmHg 和/或舒张压≥90mmHg)。

研究入选标准

记录 20 周以上妊娠时血压的研究均被纳入。

方法

采用荟萃分析方法研究血压切点与不良结局之间的关联强度,并计算考虑妊娠的诊断测试性能。

结果

共有 12 项研究被纳入。美国心脏病学会或美国心脏协会的血压类别是根据从 20 周妊娠开始至特定妊娠周数(20-27、28-32 或 33-36 周)的任何时间点的峰值血压确定的。(血压)较高(而非正常)的类别与不良结局始终存在关联。血压类别与不良结局之间的关联强度以“2 期高血压”(血压≥140/90mmHg)最大。当峰值血压在 20 周妊娠时的任何时间或在上述妊娠年龄组内报告时,结果相似。没有任何血压类别可用作不良结局的诊断“排除试验”,因为所有阴性似然比均≥0.2。只有“2 期高血压”对于预测 20 周以上妊娠的子痫前期和任何妊娠年龄组的血压的不良结局有用,因为其阳性似然比均≥5.0。

结论

从 20 周妊娠开始,140mmHg(收缩压)和 90mmHg(舒张压)的血压阈值可用于识别有不良妊娠结局风险增加的女性,无论血压测量的具体妊娠周数如何。降低 20 周以上妊娠时异常血压的血压阈值并不能帮助临床医生识别处于较高母体或围产期风险的女性。美国心脏病学会或美国心脏协会的任何血压阈值都不能保证女性不太可能发生不良结局。

相似文献

1
The 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories in the second half of pregnancy-a systematic review of their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.2017 年美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会在妊娠后半期的血压分类-对其与不良妊娠结局关系的系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;229(2):101-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
2
American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories-a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy.美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会的血压分类——与妊娠前半期不良妊娠结局关系的系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr;228(4):418-429.e34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
4
Epidural therapy for the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia in non labouring women.硬膜外治疗非分娩期妇女的重度子痫前期。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD009540. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009540.pub2.
5
Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre-existing diabetes.孕前患有糖尿病的女性孕期血糖监测技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD009613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009613.pub3.
6
Metformin for women who are overweight or obese during pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes.孕期超重或肥胖女性使用二甲双胍以改善母婴结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD010564. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010564.pub2.
7
Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term.孕34周直至足月时高血压疾病的计划早产与期待治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 15;1(1):CD009273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2.
8
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV infection in ART-eligible pregnant women.用于治疗符合抗逆转录病毒治疗条件的孕妇艾滋病毒感染的抗逆转录病毒疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD008440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008440.
9
Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.在足月或接近足月时计划分娩,以改善患有妊娠期糖尿病的孕妇及其婴儿的健康结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 5;1(1):CD012910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012910.
10
Calcium supplementation commencing before or early in pregnancy, or food fortification with calcium, for preventing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.在怀孕前或怀孕早期开始补钙,或对食物进行钙强化,以预防妊娠期高血压疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 26;9(9):CD011192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011192.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Pressure Thresholds for Hypertension in Pregnancy and Future Cardiovascular Risk.妊娠期高血压的血压阈值与未来心血管风险
Mayo Clin Proc. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.04.028.
2
Early pregnancy triglycerides and blood pressure: a combined predictor for preeclampsia.孕早期甘油三酯与血压:子痫前期的联合预测指标
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07761-3.
3
Do lower antenatal blood pressure cut-offs in pregnant women with obesity identify those at greater risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes? A secondary analysis of data from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT).
肥胖孕妇更低的产前血压临界值能否识别出母婴不良结局风险更高的人群?对英国孕期更好饮食与活动试验(UPBEAT)数据的二次分析。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01803-8.
4
Blood pressure in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A bidirectional cohort study.单胎妊娠中孕晚期血压与不良妊娠结局:一项双向队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 May 23;26:100400. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100400. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非重度高血压孕妇的降压治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02239-3.
6
The association between 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for hypertension and neonatal outcomes in Kenya: a retrospective study.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南与肯尼亚新生儿结局之间的关联:一项回顾性研究。
Trop Med Health. 2025 Mar 27;53(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00724-6.
7
Diagnostic properties of differing BP thresholds for adverse pregnancy outcomes in standard-risk nulliparous women: A secondary analysis of SCOPE cohort data.标准风险初产妇不同血压阈值对不良妊娠结局的诊断特性:SCOPE队列数据的二次分析
PLoS Med. 2025 Jan 22;22(1):e1004471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004471. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and stroke: a univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization study.妊娠高血压疾病与中风:单变量和多变量孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 21;15:1366023. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1366023. eCollection 2024.
9
Prevalence and associated factors of metabolic syndrome among pregnant Ethiopian women: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.代谢综合征在埃塞俄比亚孕妇中的流行情况及其相关因素:一项基于医院的横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 23;14(1):14424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65107-z.
10
Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Who Developed Elevated Blood Pressure and Stage I Hypertension after 20 Weeks, Gestation.妊娠 20 周后出现血压升高和 1 期高血压的女性的妊娠结局。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Nov;41(15):2135-2143. doi: 10.1055/a-2298-5347. Epub 2024 Apr 3.