Biological and Experimental Psychology Group, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Risk and Information Management, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Health Informatics and Knowledge Engineering Research (HiKER) Group, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Dec;24(12):969-980. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
Behavioural change techniques are currently used by many global organisations and public institutions. The amassing evidence base is used to answer practical and scientific questions regarding what cognitive, affective, and environment factors lead to successful behavioural change in the laboratory and in the field. In this piece we show that there is also value to examining interventions that inadvertently fail in achieving their desired behavioural change (e.g., backfiring effects). We identify the underlying causal pathways that characterise different types of failure, and show how a taxonomy of causal interactions that result in failure exposes new insights that can advance theory and practice.
行为改变技术目前被许多全球性组织和公共机构所采用。该技术积累的证据基础被用于回答关于认知、情感和环境因素在实验室和实地中导致成功行为改变的实际和科学问题。在这篇文章中,我们表明,检查那些无意中未能实现预期行为改变的干预措施(例如,适得其反的效果)也具有价值。我们确定了不同类型失败的特征性因果途径,并展示了导致失败的因果相互作用分类法如何揭示可以促进理论和实践的新见解。