Hauck Annabelle Susann, Buchwald Isabel, Watz Henrik, Trinkmann Frederik, Söling Charlotte, Rabenstein Andrea, Ruether Tobias, Mortensen Kai, Drömann Daniel, Franzen Klaas Frederik
Medical Clinic III, Site Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
Toxics. 2023 Jan 14;11(1):77. doi: 10.3390/toxics11010077.
Several substitute products are discussed as a healthier alternative to smoking, thereunder e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products, e.g., chewing bags, which are increasingly used in this context. We investigated the acute effects of chewing bags compared to combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes with and without nicotine on small airways and arterial stiffness in a head-to-head design. This single-center, four-arm cross-overstudy included 20 healthy occasional smokers (25 ± 0.6 years). On four test days, participants consumed one product per day. Before, during, and after consumption, peripheral and central hemodynamic as well as arterial stiffness parameters were measured by Mobil-O-Graph™ (I.E.M., Germany). Resistance and small airway function were assessed by tremoFlo® c-100 (THORASYS Thoracic Medical Systems Inc.). The combustible cigarette and the e-cigarettes with and without nicotine significantly increased the resistance of the small airways (p < 0.05), while chewing bags had no effect. All nicotine containing products (e-cigarette with nicotine, combustible cigarette, chewing bag) as well as the e-cigarette without nicotine significantly increased parameters of hemodynamic and arterial stiffness. Changes in blood pressure and arterial stiffness were similar after smoking, vaping, and using chewing bags. We conclude that e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes have similar acute harmful effects on small airway dysfunction. All nicotine containing products are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk compared with no product use.
文中讨论了几种替代产品,作为比吸烟更健康的选择,包括电子烟和无烟烟草制品,例如咀嚼袋,在这种情况下其使用越来越广泛。我们采用直接比较的设计,研究了咀嚼袋与可燃香烟以及含尼古丁和不含尼古丁的电子烟相比,对小气道和动脉僵硬度的急性影响。这项单中心、四臂交叉研究纳入了20名偶尔吸烟的健康受试者(25±0.6岁)。在四个测试日,参与者每天使用一种产品。在使用前、使用期间和使用后,通过Mobil-O-Graph™(德国I.E.M.公司)测量外周和中心血流动力学以及动脉僵硬度参数。通过tremoFlo® c-100(THORASYS胸科医疗系统公司)评估气道阻力和小气道功能。可燃香烟以及含尼古丁和不含尼古丁的电子烟均显著增加了小气道阻力(p<0.05),而咀嚼袋则无此影响。所有含尼古丁产品(含尼古丁电子烟、可燃香烟、咀嚼袋)以及不含尼古丁的电子烟均显著增加了血流动力学和动脉僵硬度参数。吸烟、吸电子烟和使用咀嚼袋后,血压和动脉僵硬度的变化相似。我们得出结论,电子烟和可燃香烟对小气道功能障碍具有相似的急性有害影响。与不使用任何产品相比,所有含尼古丁产品都与心血管风险增加有关。