Suppr超能文献

现在,通过管理尼古丁而非吸烟来挽救生命:伤害最小化的证据。

Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now: Evidence for harm minimization.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2018 Dec;117:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

Abstract

Tobacco control has made strides in prevention and cessation, but deaths will not decline rapidly without massive behavior change. Currently, inhaled smoke from combusting tobacco is chiefly responsible for prematurely killing 7.2 million people worldwide and 530,000 in the United States annually. An array of noncombustible nicotine products (NNPs) has emerged and has disrupted the marketplace. Saving lives more speedily will require societal acceptance of locating a "sweet spot" within a three-dimensional framework where NNPs are simultaneously: 1. Less toxic, 2. Appealing (can reach smokers at scale), and 3. Satisfying (adequate nicotine delivery) to displace smoking. For this harm minimization framework to eliminate smoking, a laser focus on "smoking control" (not general tobacco control) is needed. By adopting these economically viable NNPs as part of the solution, NNPs can be smoking control's valued ally. Synthesis of the science indicates that policy and regulation can sufficiently protect youth while speeding the switch away from smoking. Despite some risks of nicotine dependence that can be mitigated but not eliminated, no credible evidence counters the assertion that NNPs will save lives if they displace smoking. But scientific evidence and advocacy has selectively exaggerated NNP harms over benefits. Accurate communication is crucial to dispel the misperception of NNPs harms and reassure smokers they can successfully replace smoking cigarettes with NNPs. Saving more lives now is an attainable and pragmatic way to call for alignment of all stakeholders and factions within traditional tobacco control rather than perpetuate the unrealized and unrealizable perfection of nicotine prohibition.

摘要

烟草控制在预防和戒烟方面取得了进展,但如果没有大规模的行为改变,死亡人数不会迅速下降。目前,燃烧烟草产生的吸入烟雾是导致全球每年 720 万人和美国每年 53 万人过早死亡的主要原因。各种非燃烧尼古丁产品(NNP)已经出现,并扰乱了市场。要更快地拯救生命,就需要社会接受在一个三维框架内找到一个“甜蜜点”,在这个框架内,NNP 同时具有以下三个特点:1. 毒性较低,2. 有吸引力(可以大规模吸引吸烟者),3. 令人满意(提供足够的尼古丁输送),以取代吸烟。为了使这个减少伤害的框架能够消除吸烟,需要将重点完全放在“控烟”(而不是一般的烟草控制)上。通过将这些经济上可行的 NNP 作为解决方案的一部分,NNP 可以成为控烟的有价值的盟友。科学综合表明,政策和法规可以在加速戒烟的同时,充分保护青少年免受伤害。尽管尼古丁依赖的一些风险可以减轻,但无法消除,但没有可信的证据反驳 NNP 会取代吸烟从而拯救生命的说法。但是,科学证据和宣传选择性地夸大了 NNP 的危害而不是益处。准确的沟通对于消除对 NNP 危害的误解,以及让吸烟者放心他们可以成功地用 NNP 取代香烟至关重要。现在拯救更多的生命是一种可行且务实的方法,可以呼吁所有利益相关者和传统烟草控制内部的派别达成一致,而不是延续尼古丁禁令不切实际和无法实现的完美主义。

相似文献

5
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
9
Public Health Policies on E-Cigarettes.电子烟公共卫生政策。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 28;21(10):111. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1204-y.

引用本文的文献

6
A Scoping Review of Behavioural Studies on Heated Tobacco Products.加热烟草制品行为研究的范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65773. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

2
How to Think-Not Feel-about Tobacco Harm Reduction.关于烟草减害,要去思考而非感受。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Sep 19;21(10):1299-1309. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty084.
7
E-Cigarettes and the Harm-Reduction Continuum.电子烟与危害降低连续体
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):216-219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1711991.
9
E-Cigarettes: Use, Effects on Smoking, Risks, and Policy Implications.电子烟:使用、对吸烟的影响、风险和政策含义。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:215-235. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013757. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Answering the question or questioning the answer?回答问题还是质疑答案?
Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):407-409. doi: 10.1111/add.14102. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验