Interdisciplinary Cooperation for Ayahuasca Research and Outreach (ICARO), School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, 13083-887, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil; Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho 3000, Lagoa Nova, 59078-900, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Interdisciplinary Cooperation for Ayahuasca Research and Outreach (ICARO), School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, 13083-887, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil; Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Senador Salgado Filho 3000, Lagoa Nova, 59078-900, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Mar;68:89-104. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.12.013. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
Language has been explored as a window into the mind. Psychedelics, known to affect perception and cognition, seem to change language, but a systematic, time-dependent exploration is lacking. Therefore, we aimed at mapping the psychedelic effects on language over the time course of the acute and sub-acute effects in an explorative manner. For this, 24 healthy volunteers (age [mean±SD, range]: 35±11, 25-61 years; 33% women) received 50 μg lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) or inactive placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. We assessed different language productions (experience reporting, storytelling), components (structure, semantics, vocabulary) and time points (+0 h to +24 h). Language productions included 5-min experience reporting (+1.5 h, +6.5 h) and 1-min storytelling (+0 h, +2 h, +4 h, +6 h, +24 h). Language structure was assessed by computing speech topology (SpeechGraphs), semantics by semantic distances (FastText), vocabulary by word categories (LIWC). LSD, compared to placebo, changed language structure, including decreased verbosity, lexicon, global and local connectivity (+1.5 h to +4 h); decreased semantic distances between neighbouring words and overall words (+2 h to +24 h); and changed vocabulary related to grammar, persons, time, space and biological processes (+1.5 h to +24 h). In conclusion, low to moderate LSD doses changed language over diverse production types, components and time points. While simpler and disconnected structure and semantic similarity might reflect cognitive impairments, changed vocabulary might reflect subjective perceptions. Therefore, language under LSD might provide a window into the psychedelic mind and automated language quantifications should be better explored as valuable tools to yield more unconstrained insights into psychedelic perception and cognition.
语言一直被视为洞察思维的一扇窗口。致幻剂已知会影响感知和认知,似乎会改变语言,但缺乏系统的、随时间变化的探索。因此,我们旨在以探索的方式绘制致幻剂在急性和亚急性作用过程中对语言的影响随时间的变化。为此,24 名健康志愿者(年龄[均值±标准差,范围]:35±11,25-61 岁;33%为女性)在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究中接受了 50μg 麦角酰二乙胺(LSD)或无效安慰剂。我们评估了不同的语言表达(体验报告、讲故事)、组成部分(结构、语义、词汇)和时间点(+0 h 至+24 h)。语言表达包括 5 分钟的体验报告(+1.5 h,+6.5 h)和 1 分钟的讲故事(+0 h,+2 h,+4 h,+6 h,+24 h)。语言结构通过计算语音拓扑(SpeechGraphs)进行评估,语义通过语义距离(FastText)进行评估,词汇通过词汇类别(LIWC)进行评估。与安慰剂相比,LSD 改变了语言结构,包括减少了言语的冗长、词汇量、全局和局部连通性(+1.5 h 至+4 h);减少了相邻单词和整体单词之间的语义距离(+2 h 至+24 h);改变了与语法、人物、时间、空间和生物过程相关的词汇(+1.5 h 至+24 h)。总之,低至中等剂量的 LSD 改变了多种类型的语言表达、组成部分和时间点。虽然更简单和不连贯的结构和语义相似性可能反映了认知障碍,但词汇的改变可能反映了主观感知。因此,LSD 下的语言可能为洞察致幻思维提供了一扇窗口,自动语言量化应该被更好地探索,作为提供更自由见解的有价值工具,以了解致幻感知和认知。