Service des Maladies Respiratoires, CHU Reims, France.
Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation, CHU Reims, France; UR3797, VieFra, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France.
Neuromuscul Disord. 2023 Feb;33(2):187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2022.12.015. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
In myotonic mystrophy type 1 (DM1), combining respiratory symptom screening and respiratory function testing, is crucial to identify the appropriate time for ventilatory support initiation. Dyspnea has been little investigated in DM1. To provide a multidimensional description of dyspnea, questionnaires assessing dyspnea were administered to 34 consecutive adult patients with DM1 (median (25th-75th centile) age of 36 (28-49), Vital Capacity (VC) of 74 (64-87)% of predicted value). Dyspnea scores were low whatever the questionnaire used: Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile score of 2(0-4.7)/50 for dyspnea sensory descriptor and of 0 (0-4.7)/60 for the emotional descriptor, Visual Analogue Scale score of 0 (0-0)/10 in sitting and supine position and Borg score after six-minute walk test (6MWT) of 2.2 (1.8-4.2)/10. Eleven patients (32%) reported disabling dyspnea in daily living (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥ 2). In comparison with patients with mMRC score < 2, patients with mMRC score ≥ 2 had a more severe motor handicap (Muscular Impairment Rating score of 4.0 (4.0-4.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.5), p<0.01), a lower 6MWT distance (373 (260-424) vs 436 (346-499)m, p = 0.03) and a lower VC (64 (48-74)% vs 75 (69-89)%, p = 0.02). These data suggest that the mMRC scale might be an easy-to-use and useful tool to assess dyspnea in daily living in DM1 patients. However, the interest of integrating the mMRC dyspnea scale in clinical practice to guide therapeutic management of DM1 patients remains to be assessed in further studies.
在 1 型肌强直性营养不良(DM1)中,结合呼吸症状筛查和呼吸功能测试对于确定开始通气支持的适当时间至关重要。DM1 中的呼吸困难研究较少。为了对呼吸困难进行多维描述,我们向 34 例连续的成年 DM1 患者(中位数(25 百分位数-75 百分位数)年龄为 36(28-49)岁,肺活量(VC)为预计值的 74%(64-87%))使用评估呼吸困难的问卷进行了调查。无论使用哪种问卷,呼吸困难评分都较低:多维呼吸困难量表的呼吸困难感觉描述符得分为 2(0-4.7)/50,情绪描述符得分为 0(0-4.7)/60,坐卧位视觉模拟量表得分为 0(0-0)/10,六分钟步行试验(6MWT)后的 Borg 评分得分为 2.2(1.8-4.2)/10。11 名患者(32%)报告日常生活中存在致残性呼吸困难(改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)评分≥2)。与 mMRC 评分<2 的患者相比,mMRC 评分≥2 的患者运动障碍更严重(肌肉功能障碍评分 4.0(4.0-4.0)vs 3.0(2.0-3.5),p<0.01),6MWT 距离更短(373(260-424)vs 436(346-499)m,p=0.03),VC 更低(64(48-74)%vs 75(69-89)%,p=0.02)。这些数据表明,mMRC 量表可能是一种易于使用且有用的工具,可用于评估 DM1 患者日常生活中的呼吸困难。然而,在进一步的研究中,仍需要评估将 mMRC 呼吸困难量表整合到临床实践中以指导 DM1 患者治疗管理的意义。