Truman School of Government and Public Affairs, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023 Oct;123(10S):S5-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
This article sets the stage for the "25 Years of Food Security Measurement: Answered Questions and Further Research" conference, with support from the Economic Research Service of the US Department of Agriculture, by providing some history of federal food security measurement, summarizing notable findings, and reviewing selected special topics in analysis methods. The federal government uses food security surveys to monitor national progress toward reducing food insecurity and to evaluate federal nutrition assistance programs. For the monitoring purpose, there is a tension between focus (on a single authoritative measurement approach) and breadth (encompassing multiple tools or instruments suitable for diverse populations, contexts, and applications). For the program evaluation purpose, challenges include coordination with study designs capable of real causal estimation in the face of strong self-selection effects and tailored reference periods in survey questions that match the timing of program participation. Some analysis methods treat the food security survey items as distinct experiences of hardship, whereas others treat the food security survey items as windows on an underlying latent variable, a food insecurity score. The severity of food-related hardship may be assessed quantitatively by the number of distinct hardships reported, by the estimated value of a latent food insecurity score, or by the frequency of occurrence for sentinel hardships. Ongoing work investigates statistical approaches that are sufficiently simple for policy application and yet sufficiently flexible to accurately match the empirical survey evidence.
本文为“25 年食品安全测量:答疑解惑与进一步研究”会议奠定了基础,该会议得到了美国农业部经济研究局的支持,提供了一些联邦食品安全测量的历史,总结了显著的发现,并回顾了分析方法中的一些选定专题。联邦政府使用食品安全调查来监测国家在减少食品安全方面的进展,并评估联邦营养援助计划。就监测目的而言,存在焦点(单一权威测量方法)和广度(涵盖适合不同人群、背景和应用的多种工具或仪器)之间的紧张关系。就计划评估目的而言,面临的挑战包括与能够在强烈的自选择效应和调查问题中与计划参与时间相匹配的定制参考期的现实因果估计研究设计相协调。一些分析方法将食品安全调查项目视为不同的困难经历,而另一些方法则将食品安全调查项目视为潜在隐性变量(食品安全得分)的窗口。通过报告的不同困难数量、潜在食品安全得分的估计值或哨兵困难的发生频率,可以定量评估与食物相关的困难的严重程度。正在进行的工作调查了统计方法,这些方法对于政策应用足够简单,并且足够灵活,可以准确匹配经验调查证据。