Suppr超能文献

使用米多君作为辅助疗法使患者脱离静脉血管加压药:一项随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

The Use of Midodrine as an Adjunctive Therapy to Liberate Patients from Intravenous Vasopressors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

作者信息

Hamed Mohamed, Elseidy Sheref A, Elkheshen Ahmed, Maher Jamal, Elmoghrabi Adel, Zaghloul Ahmed, Panakos Andrew, Panaich Sidakpal, Saad Marwan, Elbadawi Ayman

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Ther. 2023 Mar;12(1):185-195. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00301-0. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating the role of midodrine as an adjunctive therapy to liberate patients with shock from intravenous (IV) vasopressors have yielded mixed results. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of midodrine as an adjunctive therapy to liberate patients with shock from IV vasopressors.

METHODS

Electronic searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through April 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the use of midodrine versus control in patients with shock and a low dose of IV vasopressors. The primary outcome was total IV vasopressor time, while the secondary outcomes included time-to-IV vasopressor discontinuation, IV vasopressor restart, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and incidence of bradycardia.

RESULTS

The final analysis included four RCTs with a total of 314 patients: 158 in the midodrine group and 156 in the control group, with a weighted mean age of 64 years (54.2% men). There was no significant difference in the total IV vasopressor time between the midodrine and control groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] - 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.38 to 0.32, p = 0.22; I = 92%). Also, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the time-to-IV vasopressor discontinuation (SMD - 0.05; 95% CI - 0.57 to 0.47, p = 0.09), IV vasopressor restart (19.3 vs. 28.3%; risk ratio [RR] 0.74; 95% 0.25-2.20, p = 0.59), ICU LOS (SMD - 0.49; 95% CI - 1.30 to 0.33, p = 0.24), and hospital LOS (SMD 0.01; 95% CI - 0.27 to 0.29, p = 0.92). However, compared with the control group, the midodrine group had a higher risk of bradycardia (15.3 vs. 2.1% RR 5.56; 95% CI 1.54-20.05, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with vasopressor-dependent shock, midodrine was not associated with early liberation of vasopressor support or shorter ICU or hospital length of stay. Adding midodrine increased the risk of bradycardia. Further large RCTs are needed to better evaluate the efficacy and safety of midodrine in liberating patients from IV vasopressors.

摘要

背景

评估米多君作为辅助治疗手段帮助休克患者停用静脉血管升压药的研究结果不一。本研究的目的是评估米多君作为辅助治疗手段帮助休克患者停用静脉血管升压药的有效性和安全性。

方法

通过电子检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,检索截至2022年4月的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验评估了米多君与对照组在休克且使用低剂量静脉血管升压药患者中的应用。主要结局是静脉血管升压药的总使用时间,次要结局包括静脉血管升压药停用时间、静脉血管升压药再次使用、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、医院住院时间以及心动过缓的发生率。

结果

最终分析纳入了4项RCT,共314例患者:米多君组158例,对照组156例,加权平均年龄64岁(男性占54.2%)。米多君组和对照组在静脉血管升压药总使用时间上无显著差异(标准化均数差[SMD] -0.53;95%置信区间[CI] -1.38至0.32,p = 0.22;I² = 92%)。此外,两组在静脉血管升压药停用时间(SMD -0.05;95% CI -0.57至0.47,p = 0.09)、静脉血管升压药再次使用(19.3%对28.3%;风险比[RR] 0.74;95% CI 0.25 - 2.20,p = 0.59)、ICU住院时间(SMD -0.49;95% CI -1.30至0.33,p = 0.24)和医院住院时间(SMD 0.01;95% CI -0.27至0.29,p = 0.92)方面也无显著差异。然而,与对照组相比,米多君组心动过缓的风险更高(15.3%对2.1%;RR 5.56;95% CI 1.54 - 20.05,p = 0.01)。

结论

在依赖血管升压药的休克患者中,米多君与早期停用血管升压药支持或缩短ICU或医院住院时间无关。添加米多君会增加心动过缓的风险。需要进一步开展大型RCT以更好地评估米多君在帮助患者停用静脉血管升压药方面的有效性和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74b8/9986154/c1254be9498a/40119_2023_301_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验