Innes-Smith J
Int J Psychoanal. 1987;68 ( Pt 3):405-13.
There are more and more references in the literature to patients who are difficult to categorize and who arouse a particular counter-transference reaction of boredom or paralysis in the analyst. The verbal communication seems ineffective, the analysis tends to become prolonged and without real change in the patient. The hypothesis is made that these phenomena may arise from the persistence of certain types of object cathexis originating in the normal autistic phase of development, where bodily sensations predominate and verbal communication is not yet established. Tustin's work is quoted as particularly illuminating this phase of the infant's life, and a clinical example is given.
文献中越来越多地提到一些难以归类的患者,他们会在分析师身上引发一种特殊的反移情反应,即厌烦或麻痹。言语交流似乎无效,分析往往会延长,而患者却没有真正的改变。有人提出假设,这些现象可能源于某些类型的客体贯注的持续存在,这些贯注起源于正常的自闭发展阶段,在这个阶段,身体感觉占主导地位,言语交流尚未建立。有人引用图斯汀的著作来特别说明婴儿生活的这个阶段,并给出了一个临床实例。