• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于区域差异信息熵的图像恢复质量评估

Image Restoration Quality Assessment Based on Regional Differential Information Entropy.

作者信息

Wang Zhiyu, Zhuang Jiayan, Ye Sichao, Xu Ningyuan, Xiao Jiangjian, Peng Chengbin

机构信息

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.

Ningbo Institute of Industrial Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;25(1):144. doi: 10.3390/e25010144.

DOI:10.3390/e25010144
PMID:36673285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9857637/
Abstract

With the development of image recovery models, especially those based on adversarial and perceptual losses, the detailed texture portions of images are being recovered more naturally. However, these restored images are similar but not identical in detail texture to their reference images. With traditional image quality assessment methods, results with better subjective perceived quality often score lower in objective scoring. Assessment methods suffer from subjective and objective inconsistencies. This paper proposes a regional differential information entropy (RDIE) method for image quality assessment to address this problem. This approach allows better assessment of similar but not identical textural details and achieves good agreement with perceived quality. Neural networks are used to reshape the process of calculating information entropy, improving the speed and efficiency of the operation. Experiments conducted with this study's image quality assessment dataset and the PIPAL dataset show that the proposed RDIE method yields a high degree of agreement with people's average opinion scores compared with other image quality assessment metrics, proving that RDIE can better quantify the perceived quality of images.

摘要

随着图像恢复模型的发展,特别是基于对抗性损失和感知损失的模型,图像的细节纹理部分得到了更自然的恢复。然而,这些恢复后的图像在细节纹理上与其参考图像相似但并不完全相同。使用传统的图像质量评估方法时,主观感知质量较好的结果在客观评分中往往得分较低。评估方法存在主观和客观不一致的问题。本文提出了一种用于图像质量评估的区域差分信息熵(RDIE)方法来解决这一问题。这种方法能够更好地评估相似但不完全相同的纹理细节,并与感知质量达成良好的一致性。利用神经网络对计算信息熵的过程进行重塑,提高了运算速度和效率。使用本研究的图像质量评估数据集和PIPAL数据集进行的实验表明,与其他图像质量评估指标相比,所提出的RDIE方法与人们的平均意见得分具有高度一致性,证明RDIE能够更好地量化图像的感知质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/e0e1cafe1d08/entropy-25-00144-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/6540e7109fb1/entropy-25-00144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/e2733eab8db6/entropy-25-00144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/3bac4bf94138/entropy-25-00144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/d0862aaa3b27/entropy-25-00144-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/af1861b2d115/entropy-25-00144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/28ce25729616/entropy-25-00144-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/63c8d5bbf540/entropy-25-00144-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/e0e1cafe1d08/entropy-25-00144-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/6540e7109fb1/entropy-25-00144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/e2733eab8db6/entropy-25-00144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/3bac4bf94138/entropy-25-00144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/d0862aaa3b27/entropy-25-00144-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/af1861b2d115/entropy-25-00144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/28ce25729616/entropy-25-00144-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/63c8d5bbf540/entropy-25-00144-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e49/9857637/e0e1cafe1d08/entropy-25-00144-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Image Restoration Quality Assessment Based on Regional Differential Information Entropy.基于区域差异信息熵的图像恢复质量评估
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;25(1):144. doi: 10.3390/e25010144.
2
Cervical lesion image enhancement based on conditional entropy generative adversarial network framework.基于条件摘生成对抗网络框架的宫颈病变图像增强。
Methods. 2022 Jul;203:523-532. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
3
Medical image fusion quality assessment based on conditional generative adversarial network.基于条件生成对抗网络的医学图像融合质量评估
Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug 9;16:986153. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.986153. eCollection 2022.
4
Stopping Criterion during Rendering of Computer-Generated Images Based on SVD-Entropy.基于奇异值分解熵的计算机生成图像渲染过程中的停止准则。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;23(1):75. doi: 10.3390/e23010075.
5
VCRNet: Visual Compensation Restoration Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment.VCRNet:用于无参考图像质量评估的视觉补偿恢复网络。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2022;31:1613-1627. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2022.3144892. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
The synthesis of high-energy CT images from low-energy CT images using an improved cycle generative adversarial network.使用改进的循环生成对抗网络从低能CT图像合成高能CT图像。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):28-42. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-182.
7
Semantic Perceptual Image Compression With a Laplacian Pyramid of Convolutional Networks.基于卷积网络拉普拉斯金字塔的语义感知图像压缩
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2021;30:4225-4237. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2021.3065244. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
8
TPFusion: Texture Preserving Fusion of Infrared and Visible Images via Dense Networks.TPFusion:通过密集网络实现红外与可见光图像的纹理保留融合
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Feb 19;24(2):294. doi: 10.3390/e24020294.
9
No-reference image quality assessment for confocal endoscopy images with perceptual local descriptor.基于感知局部描述符的共聚焦内窥镜图像无参考质量评估。
J Biomed Opt. 2022 May;27(5). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.27.5.056503.
10
[CT image quality assessment based on prior information of pre-restored images].基于预恢复图像先验信息的CT图像质量评估
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Feb 25;41(2):230-237. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.02.10.

本文引用的文献

1
Image Quality Assessment Using Contrastive Learning.基于对比学习的图像质量评估
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2022;31:4149-4161. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2022.3181496. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
FFDNet: Toward a Fast and Flexible Solution for CNN based Image Denoising.FFDNet:迈向基于卷积神经网络的图像去噪快速灵活解决方案
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 May 25. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2018.2839891.
3
Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment.深度神经网络在无参考和全参考图像质量评估中的应用。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 Jan;27(1):206-219. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2760518. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising.超越高斯去噪器:用于图像去噪的深度 CNN 的残差学习。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Jul;26(7):3142-3155. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
A Novel Image Quality Assessment With Globally and Locally Consilient Visual Quality Perception.一种具有全局和局部一致性视觉感知的新型图像质量评估方法。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016 May;25(5):2392-406. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2545863.
6
Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.梯度幅度相似性偏差:一种高效的感知图像质量指数。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014 Feb;23(2):684-95. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2013.2293423.
7
VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment.VSI:一种基于视觉显著性的感知图像质量评估指标。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014 Oct;23(10):4270-81. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2014.2346028. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
8
Image quality assessment based on gradient similarity.基于梯度相似性的图像质量评估。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012 Apr;21(4):1500-12. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2175935. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
9
FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.FSIM:一种用于图像质量评估的特征相似性指数。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011 Aug;20(8):2378-86. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
10
Image quality assessment based on a degradation model.基于退化模型的图像质量评估
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2000;9(4):636-50. doi: 10.1109/83.841940.