• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排泄护理中使用纸质尿布的手动人力护理与机器人辅助护理对正式护理人员的身体护理负担的比较。

Comparison of the Physical Care Burden on Formal Caregivers between Manual Human Care Using a Paper Diaper and Robot-Aided Care in Excretion Care.

机构信息

Digital Healthcare R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021281.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20021281
PMID:36674037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9858739/
Abstract

Although the older population has been rapidly growing, the availability of formal caregivers remains limited. Assistance provided by care robots has helped lower this burden; however, whether using a care robot while providing excretion care (EC) is quantitatively increasing or decreasing caregivers' physical care burden has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to quantitatively compare the physical burden experienced by caregivers while providing manual excretion care (MC) using a paper diaper versus robot-aided care (RC). Ten formal caregivers voluntarily participated in the experiment. MC and RC tasks were structuralized according to phases and classified by characteristics. The experiment was conducted in a smart care space. The physical load of formal caregivers was estimated by muscular activity and subjective rating of perceived physical discomfort. The results demonstrated that although the physical load on the lower back and upper extremities during the preparation and post-care phases were greater in RC than MC, RC markedly alleviated caregivers' physical load when performing front tasks. In the preparation-care phases, the physical loads on the lower back and upper extremities were approximately 40.2 and 39.6% higher in the case of RC than MC, respectively. Similar to the preparation-care phases, the physical loads on the lower back and upper extremities during post-care phases were approximately 39.5 and 61.7% greater in the case of RC than MC, respectively. On the other hand, in the front-care phases, the physical loads on the lower back and upper extremities were approximately 25.6 and 34.9% lower in the case of RC than MC, respectively. These findings can quantitatively explain the effectiveness and features of a care robot to stakeholders and provide foundational research data for the development of EC robots. This study emphasizes the implementation and promotion of the dissemination, popularization, and development of care robots to fulfill formal caregiving needs.

摘要

尽管老年人口增长迅速,但正式护理人员的供应仍然有限。护理机器人的帮助降低了这种负担;然而,使用护理机器人提供排泄护理(EC)是否在增加或减少护理人员的身体护理负担方面并没有得到广泛研究。本研究旨在定量比较使用纸质尿布进行手动排泄护理(MC)和机器人辅助护理(RC)时护理人员所经历的身体负担。十名正式护理人员自愿参加了实验。根据阶段对 MC 和 RC 任务进行结构化,并根据特征进行分类。实验在智能护理空间中进行。通过肌肉活动和对感知身体不适的主观评价来估计正式护理人员的身体负荷。结果表明,尽管在准备和护理后阶段,RC 中护理人员的下背部和上肢的体力负荷更大,但 RC 在执行前任务时明显减轻了护理人员的体力负荷。在准备-护理阶段,RC 的下背部和上肢的体力负荷分别比 MC 高约 40.2%和 39.6%。与准备-护理阶段类似,在护理后阶段,RC 的下背部和上肢的体力负荷分别比 MC 高约 39.5%和 61.7%。另一方面,在前护理阶段,RC 的下背部和上肢的体力负荷分别比 MC 低约 25.6%和 34.9%。这些发现可以定量解释护理机器人的有效性和特点,为 EC 机器人的开发提供基础研究数据。本研究强调了实施和推广护理机器人的传播、普及和发展,以满足正式护理需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/76639eef193f/ijerph-20-01281-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/e05382819bd8/ijerph-20-01281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/9897eb0e4eda/ijerph-20-01281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/ac294a185dce/ijerph-20-01281-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/445e859a4a1e/ijerph-20-01281-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/b47dd5b16150/ijerph-20-01281-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/f1141eb0e41b/ijerph-20-01281-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/76639eef193f/ijerph-20-01281-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/e05382819bd8/ijerph-20-01281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/9897eb0e4eda/ijerph-20-01281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/ac294a185dce/ijerph-20-01281-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/445e859a4a1e/ijerph-20-01281-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/b47dd5b16150/ijerph-20-01281-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/f1141eb0e41b/ijerph-20-01281-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bfc/9858739/76639eef193f/ijerph-20-01281-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Physical Care Burden on Formal Caregivers between Manual Human Care Using a Paper Diaper and Robot-Aided Care in Excretion Care.排泄护理中使用纸质尿布的手动人力护理与机器人辅助护理对正式护理人员的身体护理负担的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021281.
2
The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.利益相关者认知对老年护理用人形机器人使用的影响:互动后横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46617. doi: 10.2196/46617.
3
Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Lift-Assist Device Regarding Caregiver Posture and Muscle Load for Transferring Tasks.评价助起设备在转移任务中对护理人员姿势和肌肉负荷的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;20(2):1174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021174.
4
Caregiver perspectives on a smart home-based socially assistive robot for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia.照顾者对智能家居社交辅助机器人在阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆患者中的应用的看法。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Oct;15(7):789-798. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1753831. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.用于协助日常活动的机器人:阿尔茨海默病老年人及其照料者的观点。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jan;29(1):67-79. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001435. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Caregiver Burden and Associated Factors for the Respite Care Needs among the Family Caregivers of Community Dwelling Senior Citizens in Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand.泰国清迈社区居住的老年公民家庭照顾者的负担和暂息照顾需求的相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 30;18(11):5873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115873.
7
Acceptability of Social Robots and Adaptation of Hybrid-Face Robot for Dementia Care in India: A Qualitative Study.社交机器人的可接受性和混合脸机器人在印度的痴呆症护理中的适应性:定性研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(2):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
9
Formal caregivers' perceptions and experiences of using pet robots for persons living with dementia in long-term care: A meta-ethnography.专业照护者使用宠物机器人照顾长期照护机构中痴呆症患者的感知和体验:元民族志研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jan;77(1):83-97. doi: 10.1111/jan.14581. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
Understanding Caregiver Challenges: A Comprehensive Exploration of Available Resources to Alleviate Caregiving Burdens.了解照顾者面临的挑战:对减轻照顾负担可用资源的全面探索。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 6;15(8):e43052. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43052. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of care robots in alleviating physical burden and pain for caregivers: Non-randomized prospective interventional study - Preliminary study.护理机器人在减轻护理人员身体负担和疼痛方面的有效性:非随机前瞻性干预研究——初步研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40877. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040877.
2
The relationship between effort-reward imbalance and quality of working life among medical caregivers: mediating effects of job burnout.医疗护理人员中努力-回报失衡与工作生活质量的关系:职业倦怠的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 25;15:1375022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375022. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between work content and musculoskeletal disorders among home caregivers: a cross-section study.家庭护理人员工作内容与肌肉骨骼疾病之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Ind Health. 2022 Dec 1;60(6):514-524. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0160. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
The burden of high workload on the health-related quality of life among home care workers in Northern Sweden.瑞典北部家庭护理人员高工作量对健康相关生活质量的负担。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Aug;93(6):747-764. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01530-9. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
The effect of care burden on formal caregiver's quality of work life: a mixed-methods study.
照顾负担对正式照顾者工作生活质量的影响:混合方法研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec;34(4):1001-1009. doi: 10.1111/scs.12808. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Can the Use of Turn-Assist Surfaces Reduce the Physical Burden on Caregivers When Performing Patient Turning?使用翻身辅助表面能否减轻护理人员在为患者翻身时的身体负担?
Hum Factors. 2020 Feb;62(1):77-92. doi: 10.1177/0018720819845746. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Nurses' needs for care robots in integrated nursing care services.综合护理服务中护士对护理机器人的需求。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 May 13. doi: 10.1111/jan.13711.
6
Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders for Nurses in Hospitals, Long-Term Care Facilities, and Home Health Care: A Comprehensive Review.医院、长期护理机构和家庭医疗保健中护士肌肉骨骼疾病的患病率:一项综合综述。
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):754-92. doi: 10.1177/0018720815581933. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
Musculoskeletal Discomfort, Physical Demand, and Caregiving Activities in Informal Caregivers.非正式照料者的肌肉骨骼不适、身体需求及照料活动
J Appl Gerontol. 2015 Sep;34(6):734-60. doi: 10.1177/0733464813496464. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
Assessing the interplay between the shoulders and low back during manual patient handling techniques in a nursing setting.评估护理环境中手动患者搬运技术中肩部和低背部之间的相互作用。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(1):127-37. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077026.
9
Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination.表面肌电信号滤波:运动伪迹和基线噪声污染。
J Biomech. 2010 May 28;43(8):1573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.027. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
10
Low back problems and possible improvements in nursing jobs.腰部问题以及护理工作中可能的改善措施。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jul;55(1):79-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03877.x.