College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China.
Key Laboratory of Watershed Earth Surface Processes and Ecological Security, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;20(2):1618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021618.
As a great practice of building a community of shared future for mankind, the Belt and Road Initiative is facing geopolitical risk brought by great power games, regional conflicts and terrorism. It is an important mission of geopolitical research to scientifically deal with the geopolitical risk along the Belt and Road. This study systematically constructs the geopolitical risk assessment index system and analyzes the spatiotemporal evolution, obstacle factors and risk types of geopolitical risk of countries along the Belt and Road by using the entropy weight TOPSIS model, obstacle degree model and minimum variance method. The research results showed that: (1) From 2005 to 2020, the polarization of geopolitical risk in countries along the Belt and Road was very significant, and the overall trend of geopolitical risk tended to deteriorate. (2) The Middle East and Eastern Europe were the most important geopolitical risk zones along the Belt and Road, and Afghanistan, Iraq, Russia and Ukraine were the main high geopolitical risk centers, with significant risk spillover effects from these centers. (3) Terrorism and close relations with the United States were the most important obstacle factors for geopolitical risk in countries along the Belt and Road, and military intervention politics, trade dependence degree and foreign debt burden were important obstacle factors for geopolitical risk in countries along the Belt and Road. (4) Geopolitical risk along the Belt and Road can be divided into sovereign risk dominant type, sovereign and military risk dominant type, sovereign and major power intervention risk dominant type, and sovereign and military and major power intervention risk jointly dominated type, among which sovereign and military and major power intervention risk jointly dominated type was the most important geopolitical risk type. In order to scientifically deal with geopolitical risk in countries along the Belt and Road, it is necessary to strengthen geopolitical risk awareness, pay attention to the dominant geopolitical risk factors, strengthen the control of regional geopolitical risk spillover and formulate reasonable risk prevention and control scheme based on geopolitical risk types.
作为构建人类命运共同体的伟大实践,“一带一路”倡议面临着大国博弈、地区冲突和恐怖主义带来的地缘政治风险。科学应对“一带一路”地缘政治风险是地缘政治研究的重要任务。本研究运用熵权 TOPSIS 模型、障碍度模型和最小方差法,系统构建了地缘政治风险评价指标体系,分析了“一带一路”沿线国家的地缘政治风险时空演变、障碍因素和风险类型。研究结果表明:(1)2005-2020 年,“一带一路”沿线国家地缘政治风险极化程度非常显著,整体呈恶化趋势;(2)中东和东欧是“一带一路”最重要的地缘政治风险区,阿富汗、伊拉克、俄罗斯和乌克兰是主要的高地缘政治风险中心,这些中心具有显著的风险溢出效应;(3)恐怖主义和与美国的密切关系是“一带一路”沿线国家地缘政治风险的最重要障碍因素,军事干预政治、贸易依存度和外债负担是“一带一路”沿线国家地缘政治风险的重要障碍因素;(4)“一带一路”地缘政治风险可分为主权风险主导型、主权和军事风险主导型、主权和大国干预风险主导型、主权和军事和大国干预风险共同主导型,其中主权和军事和大国干预风险共同主导型是最重要的地缘政治风险类型。为科学应对“一带一路”沿线国家的地缘政治风险,需要增强地缘政治风险意识,关注主导地缘政治风险因素,加强区域地缘政治风险溢出的控制,并根据地缘政治风险类型制定合理的风险防范和控制方案。