Pellegrini C A, DeMeester T R, Johnson L F, Skinner D B
Surgery. 1979 Jul;86(1):110-9.
The incidence of aspiration, the causative esophageal pathophysiology, and the results of surgical therapy were evaluated in 100 patients with abnormal gastroesophageal reflux documented by 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Based on historical evidence, 48 patients were suspected to be aspirators. Eight patients had documented episodes of aspiration (drop on esophagela pH, followed by acid taste in mouth and onset of cough or wheezing spell) during the monitoring period. Nine patients were considered to be potential aspirators because they presented oral acid regurgitation without development of pulmonary symptoms. In five patients a primary respiratory disorder (PRD) induced gastroesophageal reflux. The remaining 78 patients had abnormal reflux without aspiartion or regurgitation. Aspirators had a 75% incidence of esophageal motor abnormality on manometry, and the clearance of refluxed acid was significantly delayed in the supine position. A history of heartburn and endoscopic evidence of esophagitis were present in only half of the patients who were documented aspirators. Potential aspirators were spared from aspiration by rapid esophageal clearance of refluxed acid unaffected by changes in body position. Patients with a PRD had higher distal esophageal segment (DES) pressure and normal esophageal motility with minimal esophagitis. Nonaspirators significantly improved their clearance while in the supine position, emphasizing the protective effect of esophageal peristalsis against aspiration. An antireflux procedure in five aspirators raised the DES pressure significantly and returned the reflux status to normal by 24-hour pH-monitoring standards. The incidence of aspiration appears to be less than that suspected by history and is due to a motor disorder that interferes with the ability of the esophagus to clear reflex acid. Abnormal pulmonary symptoms can induce or result from gastroesophageal reflux and, when the latter occurs, an antireflex procedure stops both reflux and aspiration.
通过24小时食管pH监测记录了胃食管反流异常的100例患者,对其误吸发生率、食管致病病理生理学及手术治疗结果进行了评估。根据既往证据,48例患者被怀疑有误吸情况。8例患者在监测期间有记录的误吸发作(食管pH值下降,随后口腔出现酸味并伴有咳嗽或喘息发作)。9例患者因出现口腔酸反流但无肺部症状而被视为潜在误吸者。5例患者存在原发性呼吸系统疾病(PRD)导致胃食管反流。其余78例患者有异常反流但无误吸或反流情况。误吸者在测压时食管运动异常发生率为75%,仰卧位时反流酸的清除明显延迟。有烧心病史且内镜检查有食管炎证据的情况仅在有记录的误吸患者中半数存在。潜在误吸者因反流酸能通过食管快速清除而不受体位变化影响,从而避免误吸。患有PRD的患者食管远端节段(DES)压力较高,食管运动正常,食管炎轻微。非误吸者在仰卧位时清除能力显著改善,强调了食管蠕动对误吸的保护作用。5例误吸患者行抗反流手术后,DES压力显著升高,按24小时pH监测标准反流状态恢复正常。误吸发生率似乎低于根据病史怀疑的情况,且是由于一种运动障碍干扰了食管清除反流酸的能力。异常肺部症状可由胃食管反流诱发或由其导致,当发生后者时,抗反流手术可同时阻止反流和误吸。