Danek Stella, Büttner Martha, Krois Joachim, Schwendicke Falk
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Assmannshauser Straβe 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 9;11(1):144. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010144.
To reach large groups of vaccine recipients, several high-income countries introduced mass vaccination centers for COVID-19. Understanding user experiences of these novel structures can help optimize their design and increase patient satisfaction and vaccine uptake. This study drew on user online reviews of vaccination centers to assess user experience and identify its key determinants over time, by sentiment, and by interaction. Machine learning methods were used to analyze Google reviews of six COVID-19 mass vaccination centers in Berlin from December 2020 to December 2021. 3647 user online reviews were included in the analysis. Of these, 89% (3261/3647) were positive according to user rating (four to five of five stars). A total of 85% (2740/3647) of all reviews contained text. Topic modeling of the reviews containing text identified five optimally latent topics, and keyword extraction identified 47 salient keywords. The most important themes were organization, friendliness/responsiveness, and patient flow/wait time. Key interactions for users of vaccination centers included waiting, scheduling, transit, and the vaccination itself. Keywords connected to scheduling and efficiency, such as "appointment" and "wait", were most prominent in negative reviews. Over time, the average rating score decreased from 4.7 to 4.1, and waiting and duration became more salient keywords. Overall, mass vaccination centers appear to be positively perceived, yet users became more critical over the one-year period of the pandemic vaccination campaign observed. The study shows that online reviews can provide real-time insights into newly set-up infrastructures, and policymakers should consider their use to monitor the population's response over time.
为了覆盖大量疫苗接种者,几个高收入国家设立了新冠病毒大规模疫苗接种中心。了解用户对这些新型设施的体验有助于优化其设计,提高患者满意度并增加疫苗接种率。本研究利用用户对疫苗接种中心的在线评论来评估用户体验,并随着时间推移、根据情感倾向和互动情况确定其关键决定因素。使用机器学习方法分析了2020年12月至2021年12月期间柏林六个新冠病毒大规模疫苗接种中心的谷歌评论。分析纳入了3647条用户在线评论。其中,根据用户评分(五星制中的四星或五星),89%(3261/3647)为正面评论。所有评论中共有85%(2740/3647)包含文本。对包含文本的评论进行主题建模确定了五个最优潜在主题,关键词提取确定了47个显著关键词。最重要的主题是组织、友好度/响应度以及患者流程/等待时间。疫苗接种中心用户的关键互动包括等待、预约、前往接种地点以及接种本身。与预约和效率相关的关键词,如“预约”和“等待”,在负面评论中最为突出。随着时间的推移,平均评分从4.7降至4.1,等待和时长成为更突出的关键词。总体而言,大规模疫苗接种中心似乎得到了正面评价,但在观察到的为期一年的大流行疫苗接种活动期间,用户变得更加挑剔。该研究表明,在线评论可以为新设立的基础设施提供实时见解,政策制定者应考虑利用这些评论来监测民众随时间的反应。