Nobile Bénédicte, Belzeaux Raoul, Aouizerate Bruno, Dubertret Caroline, Haffen Emmanuel, Llorca Pierre-Michel, Roux Paul, Polosan Mircea, Schwan Raymund, Walter Michel, Rey Romain, Januel Dominique, Leboyer Marion, Bellivier Frank, Etain Bruno, Courtet Philippe, Olié Emilie
Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Post-Acute Care, CHU Montpellier, France; IGF, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France; FondaMental Foundation, Créteil F-94000, France.
Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Post-Acute Care, CHU Montpellier, France; FondaMental Foundation, Créteil F-94000, France; Pôle de Psychiatrie, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France; INT-UMR7289, CNRS Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Mar;321:115055. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115055. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
Suicidal ideation (SI) is a major suicide risk factor; therefore, it is crucial to identify individuals with SI. Discrepancies between the clinicians and patients' estimation of SI may lead to under-evaluating the suicide risk. Yet, studies on discrepancies between self- and clinician-rated SI are lacking, although identifying the patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with such discrepancies might help to reduce the under-evaluation risk. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify features associated with SI rating discrepancies in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) because of the high prevalence of suicide in this population. Among the patients recruited by the French network of FondaMental expert centers for BD, patients with SI (i.e. ≥2 for item 12 of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report and/or ≥3 for item 10 of the clinician-rated Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) were selected and divided in concordant (i.e. SI in both self- and clinician-rated questionnaires; n = 130; 25.6%), and discordant (i.e. SI in only one questionnaire; n = 377; 74.4%). Depression severity was the feature most associated with SI evaluation discrepancy, especially in patients with SI identified only with the self-rated questionnaire. Clinician may under-evaluate SI presence in patients with low depression level.
自杀观念(SI)是主要的自杀风险因素;因此,识别有自杀观念的个体至关重要。临床医生与患者对自杀观念评估之间的差异可能导致对自杀风险评估不足。然而,关于自评与临床医生评定的自杀观念之间差异的研究较少,尽管识别与此类差异相关的患者社会人口学和临床特征可能有助于降低评估不足的风险。因此,本研究的目的是确定双相情感障碍(BD)患者中与自杀观念评定差异相关的特征,因为该人群自杀发生率较高。在法国 Fondamental 双相情感障碍专家中心网络招募的患者中,选择有自杀观念的患者(即抑郁症状快速自评量表第 12 项≥2 分和/或临床医生评定的蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁量表第 项≥3 分),并将其分为一致组(即自评和临床医生评定问卷中均有自杀观念;n = 130;25.6%)和不一致组(即仅在一份问卷中有自杀观念;n = 377;74.4%)。抑郁严重程度是与自杀观念评估差异最相关的特征,尤其是仅通过自评问卷识别出自杀观念的患者。临床医生可能会低估抑郁程度低的患者存在自杀观念的情况。