Centre for the Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Wolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Child Care Health Dev. 2023 Sep;49(5):889-897. doi: 10.1111/cch.13097. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Children receive care and support from social services due to the risk of harm or impeded development or because of disability. This study aimed to identify typologies of adversity experienced by children receiving care and support from social services and to explore how typologies differ by sociodemographic characteristics.
This is a cross-sectional study of 'Children Receiving Care and Support' (N = 12 792) during 2017/2018 in Wales, UK. We sought to (1) examine the prevalence of household adversities experienced by children in receipt of care and support from social services; (2) identify typologies of household adversities; and (3) explore how typologies of household adversities differ by family characteristics (demographics, measures of social disadvantage, perinatal and care factors).
We found evidence for multiple risk factor constellations. The four-class solution suggested four distinct classes of adversities: child disability (50.0%), low adversities (20.3%), family poor health (6.7%) and multiple risks (23.0%). Children in the 'multiple risk' class were significantly more likely to be younger, more deprived and 'looked after' by the local authority compared with those in the 'low adversities' class.
Given the presence of different constellations of household adversities, policies and interventions that address multiple risk factors simultaneously may be more effective and have longer-lasting benefits.
儿童因面临伤害风险、发育受阻或残疾而接受社会服务的照顾和支持。本研究旨在确定接受社会服务照顾和支持的儿童所经历的逆境类型,并探讨这些类型如何因社会人口特征而异。
这是一项 2017/2018 年在英国威尔士对“接受照顾和支持的儿童”(N=12792)进行的横断面研究。我们试图:(1) 检查接受社会服务照顾和支持的儿童所经历的家庭逆境的普遍程度;(2) 确定家庭逆境的类型学;(3) 探讨家庭逆境的类型学如何因家庭特征(人口统计学、社会劣势衡量标准、围产期和护理因素)而异。
我们发现了多种风险因素组合的证据。四分类解决方案表明存在四种不同的逆境类型:儿童残疾(50.0%)、低逆境(20.3%)、家庭健康状况不佳(6.7%)和多种风险(23.0%)。与“低逆境”类别的儿童相比,“多种风险”类别的儿童更年轻、更贫困、更可能被地方当局“照顾”。
鉴于家庭逆境存在不同的组合,同时解决多种风险因素的政策和干预措施可能更有效,且具有更长的效益。