• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多靶点粪便DNA检测与粪便潜血检测用于结直肠癌筛查的比较。

Multitarget stool DNA test compared with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Yang Cuiping, Wu Wei, Yang Yanping, Yang Xiaojin, Sun Jing, Zhang Weiyu, Liu Kun, Ying Haifeng, Jiang Songyao, Yu Xiaojun, Shi Yiqing, Zhou Yufen, Zhu Shiyan, Xu Ying, Ding Yanfei, Xie Ling, Cai Boer, Xin Xiaorong, Chen Ping, Zhao Ren, Wu Yunlin

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai 201800, P.R. China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai 200025, P.R. China.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2020 Aug;20(2):1193-1200. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11674. Epub 2020 May 25.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2020.11674
PMID:32724359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7377198/
Abstract

Patient screening is important for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study aimed to compare the multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for CRC screening. A total of 151 individuals were screened using colonoscopy, mt-sDNA and FOBT for the detection of CRC and adenoma. The results of the mt-sDNA test and FOBT were compared with colonoscopy to examine their sensitivity and specificity. Subsequently, the sensitivity and specificity of the mt-sDNA test were compared with those of FOBT in CRC and large adenoma. Stool samples were collected from patients with CRC (n=50) or large adenoma (n=51), as well as from normal controls (n=50). The mt-sDNA test outperformed FOBT in detecting CRC with a sensitivity of 90.0% (45/50) vs. 42.0% (21/50), advanced adenoma with a sensitivity of 70.6% (36/51) vs. 19.6% (10/51), stage I-III CRC with a sensitivity of 91.9% (34/37) vs. 29.7% (11/37), and stage IV CRC with a sensitivity of 84.6% (11/13) vs. 76.9% (10/13). In addition, the mt-sDNA test exhibited a specificity of 94.0% (47/50) in detecting CRC, which was superior to FOBT with a specificity of 90.0% (45/50). Therefore, the mt-sDNA test may have higher sensitivity and specificity compared with FOBT in diagnosing both CRC and advanced adenoma.

摘要

患者筛查对于结直肠癌(CRC)的早期诊断至关重要。本研究旨在比较多靶点粪便DNA(mt-sDNA)检测与粪便潜血试验(FOBT)用于CRC筛查的效果。共有151名个体接受了结肠镜检查、mt-sDNA检测和FOBT以检测CRC和腺瘤。将mt-sDNA检测和FOBT的结果与结肠镜检查结果进行比较,以评估它们的敏感性和特异性。随后,比较了mt-sDNA检测与FOBT在CRC和大腺瘤中的敏感性和特异性。从CRC患者(n = 50)或大腺瘤患者(n = 51)以及正常对照者(n = 50)中收集粪便样本。mt-sDNA检测在检测CRC方面优于FOBT,敏感性分别为90.0%(45/50)和42.0%(21/50);在检测进展性腺瘤方面,敏感性分别为70.6%(36/51)和19.6%(10/51);在检测I-III期CRC方面,敏感性分别为91.9%(34/37)和29.7%(11/37);在检测IV期CRC方面,敏感性分别为84.6%(11/13)和76.9%(10/13)。此外,mt-sDNA检测在检测CRC时的特异性为94.0%(47/50),优于FOBT的特异性90.0%(45/50)。因此,与FOBT相比,mt-sDNA检测在诊断CRC和进展性腺瘤方面可能具有更高的敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/7793ab5e5a36/ol-20-02-1193-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/5cd89b0cb505/ol-20-02-1193-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/61a187fcae83/ol-20-02-1193-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/fcc16e52e646/ol-20-02-1193-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/40f8e96ecdee/ol-20-02-1193-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/a1756b5b4f7f/ol-20-02-1193-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/e6e5c0ebabcd/ol-20-02-1193-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/7793ab5e5a36/ol-20-02-1193-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/5cd89b0cb505/ol-20-02-1193-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/61a187fcae83/ol-20-02-1193-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/fcc16e52e646/ol-20-02-1193-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/40f8e96ecdee/ol-20-02-1193-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/a1756b5b4f7f/ol-20-02-1193-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/e6e5c0ebabcd/ol-20-02-1193-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f0c/7377198/7793ab5e5a36/ol-20-02-1193-g06.jpg

相似文献

1
Multitarget stool DNA test compared with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening.多靶点粪便DNA检测与粪便潜血检测用于结直肠癌筛查的比较。
Oncol Lett. 2020 Aug;20(2):1193-1200. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11674. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening.与结直肠癌筛查相关的医疗保健成本、资源利用和生产力损失。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):843-852. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2220965. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
3
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在一般风险结直肠癌筛查人群中的性能。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;114(12):1909-1918. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445.
4
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes Between Stool- and Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.粪便与血液结直肠癌筛查试验模拟结果比较。
Popul Health Manag. 2023 Aug;26(4):239-245. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0037. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
5
Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.分析两种用于筛查普通风险成年人结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测的有效性。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
A novel multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening.一种用于结直肠癌筛查的新型多靶点粪便DNA检测方法。
Postgrad Med. 2016;128(2):268-72. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1135035. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.多靶点粪便DNA检测增加了既往不依从的医疗保险患者的结直肠癌筛查率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 21;23(3):464-471. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i3.464.
8
Stool DNA Testing for Screening Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in Alaska Native People.粪便 DNA 检测用于阿拉斯加原住民结直肠癌筛查检测。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jan;91(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9
Noninvasive fecal testing for colorectal cancer.用于结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Jan 1;524:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.10.030. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.45 岁及以上商业和医疗保险人群非侵入性基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查产品的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1219-1226. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2260681. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The diagnostic efficiency of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 methylation in the detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.组织因子途径抑制物2甲基化在结直肠癌检测中的诊断效能:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 30;16(3):965-977. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2025-319. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Diagnostic value of genetic and epigenetic biomarker panels for colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review.遗传和表观遗传生物标志物组合对结直肠癌检测的诊断价值:一项系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 22;40(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04904-y.
3
Effectiveness of single-target fecal DNA methylation test in regional mass screening for colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Hot Start Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).热启动聚合酶链反应(PCR)。
Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018 May 1;2018(5):2018/5/pdb.prot095125. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot095125.
3
Feasibility of quantifying methylation in stool DNA for early detection of colorectal cancer.
单靶点粪便DNA甲基化检测在中国结直肠癌及癌前病变区域大规模筛查中的有效性
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2025 Apr 15;13:goaf029. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goaf029. eCollection 2025.
4
Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.基于粪便检测在结直肠癌检测中的应用:一项综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 18;12(16):1645. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161645.
5
Optimization of screening strategies for colorectal cancer based on fecal DNA and occult blood testing.基于粪便 DNA 和潜血检测的结直肠癌筛查策略优化。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):336-341. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad032.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of the multi-target stool DNA test in detecting colorectal cancer: A hospital-based study.多靶点粪便DNA检测在结直肠癌诊断中的准确性:一项基于医院的研究。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Jan 15;15(1):102-111. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.102.
7
Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.在接受 FIT 阳性、mt-sDNA 阳性和仅结肠镜检查的患者中,结肠镜检查对锯齿状息肉的检出率:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Feb 6;32(2):226-232. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0527.
8
Fecal biomarkers: Non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer.粪便生物标志物:结直肠癌的非侵入性诊断
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 2;12:971930. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.971930. eCollection 2022.
9
Technical considerations in PCR-based assay design for diagnostic DNA methylation cancer biomarkers.基于 PCR 的诊断 DNA 甲基化癌症生物标志物检测分析设计中的技术考虑因素。
Clin Epigenetics. 2022 Apr 27;14(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13148-022-01273-z.
10
Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data.FIT+ 和 mt-sDNA+ 患者与结肠镜检查仅患者的结肠镜检查结果:新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记数据。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Jul 5;15(7):455-464. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0581.
检测粪便 DNA 甲基化用于结直肠癌早期检测的可行性研究。
Clin Epigenetics. 2017 Dec 4;9:126. doi: 10.1186/s13148-017-0426-3. eCollection 2017.
4
KRAS exon 2 codon 13 mutation is associated with a better prognosis than codon 12 mutation following lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer.在结直肠癌肺转移瘤切除术后,KRAS基因第2外显子13密码子突变较12密码子突变的预后更好。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):2514-2524. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13697.
5
Current noninvasive tests for colorectal cancer screening: An overview of colorectal cancer screening tests.目前用于结直肠癌筛查的非侵入性检测:结直肠癌筛查检测概述
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Nov 15;8(11):793-800. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i11.793.
6
Hypermethylated DNA as a biomarker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review.DNA高甲基化作为结直肠癌的生物标志物:一项系统综述。
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;18(6):549-61. doi: 10.1111/codi.13336.
7
Stool Investigations for Colorectal Cancer Screening: From Occult Blood Test to DNA Analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便检测:从潜血试验到DNA分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2016 Jun;47(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s12029-016-9810-z.
8
Stool DNA methylation assays in colorectal cancer screening.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便DNA甲基化检测
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 21;21(35):10057-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10057.
9
Hypermethylation of ITGA4, TFPI2 and VIMENTIN promoters is increased in inflamed colon tissue: putative risk markers for colitis-associated cancer.整合素α4(ITGA4)、组织因子途径抑制物2(TFPI2)和波形蛋白(VIMENTIN)启动子的高甲基化在炎症性结肠组织中增加:结肠炎相关癌症的潜在风险标志物。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;141(12):2097-107. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1972-8. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
10
The impact of screening on colorectal cancer mortality and incidence: has it really made a difference?筛查对结直肠癌死亡率和发病率的影响:它真的产生了作用吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):681-91. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3600-5. Epub 2015 Mar 5.