Fein Katherine C, Gleeson John P, Cochran Kyle, Lamson Nicholas G, Doerfler Rose, Melamed Jilian R, Whitehead Kathryn A
Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Bioeng Transl Med. 2022 May 31;8(1):e10342. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10342. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Although protein drugs are powerful biologic therapeutics, they cannot be delivered orally because their large size and hydrophilicity limit their absorption across the intestinal epithelium. One potential solution is the incorporation of permeation enhancers into oral protein formulations; however, few have advanced clinically due to toxicity concerns surrounding chronic use. To better understand these concerns, we conducted a 30-day longitudinal study of daily oral permeation enhancer use in mice and resultant effects on intestinal health. Specifically, we investigated three permeation enhancers: sodium caprate (C), an industry standard, as well as 1-phenylpiperazine (PPZ) and sodium deoxycholate (SDC). Over 30 days of treatment, all mice gained weight, and none required removal from the study due to poor health. Furthermore, intestinal permeability did not increase following chronic use. We also quantified the gene expression of four tight junction proteins (claudin 2, claudin 3, ZO-1, and JAM-A). Significant differences in gene expression between untreated and permeation enhancer-treated mice were found, but these varied between treatment groups, with most differences resolving after a 1-week washout period. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed no observable differences in protein localization or villus architecture between treated and untreated mice. Overall, PPZ and SDC performed comparably to C, one of the most clinically advanced enhancers, and results suggest that the chronic use of some permeation enhancers may be therapeutically viable from a safety standpoint.
尽管蛋白质药物是强大的生物治疗剂,但它们不能口服给药,因为其大分子尺寸和亲水性限制了它们穿过肠上皮的吸收。一种潜在的解决方案是在口服蛋白质制剂中加入渗透促进剂;然而,由于长期使用存在毒性问题,很少有渗透促进剂进入临床应用阶段。为了更好地理解这些问题,我们对小鼠每日口服渗透促进剂进行了为期30天的纵向研究,以及其对肠道健康的影响。具体来说,我们研究了三种渗透促进剂:癸酸钠(C),一种行业标准品,以及1-苯基哌嗪(PPZ)和脱氧胆酸钠(SDC)。在30天的治疗过程中,所有小鼠体重均增加,且没有一只小鼠因健康状况不佳而需要退出研究。此外,长期使用后肠道通透性并未增加。我们还对四种紧密连接蛋白(claudin 2、claudin 3、ZO-1和JAM-A)的基因表达进行了定量分析。在未处理小鼠和渗透促进剂处理小鼠之间发现了基因表达的显著差异,但这些差异在不同处理组之间有所不同,大多数差异在1周的洗脱期后消失。免疫荧光显微镜检查显示,处理过的小鼠和未处理的小鼠在蛋白质定位或绒毛结构上没有明显差异。总体而言,PPZ和SDC的表现与临床上最先进的增强剂之一C相当,结果表明,从安全性角度来看,长期使用某些渗透促进剂在治疗上可能是可行的。