• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜低位前切除术联合“狗耳”内翻吻合术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with "dog ear" invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis.

作者信息

Zhang L, Xie Z, Gong L, Lv X

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical College, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1038873. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1038873. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.1038873
PMID:36684252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9852756/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lateral intersecting margin (dog-ear) was a weak spot of the double stapled technique (DST), We designed "dog-ear" invagination anastomosis (DAIA), which could eliminate the "dog-ear" in laparoscopic anterior resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 202 patients underwent elective curative LLAR + DST ( = 143) or LLAR + DAIA ( = 59) were enrolled in the study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the adverse effects. The clinical data between LLAR + DST and LLAR + DAIA was compared, and the effect of factors on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed.

RESULTS

After PSM, 53 pairs of the LLRA + DST and LLRA + DAIA patients were enrolled in the study. The LLRA + DAIA group has a higher level (3.50 ± 1.03 vs. 2.87 ± 1.10,  = 0.01) of the anastomosis than that of the LLRA + DST group. Patients in LLAR + DAIA group have a lower incidence of protecting loop ileostomy compared to LLAR + DST group (20.75% vs. 5.66%,  < 0.05). The LLRA + DAIA patients presented better rates of LARS compare to LLRA + DST patients at 6 months (major LARS 37.74% ( = 20) vs. 67.93% ( = 36);  = 0.007) and 12 months (major LARS 13.21% ( = 7) vs. 20.37% ( = 11);  = 0.03) after surgery. The OS and DFS rates were similar ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic low anterior resection with "dog-ear" invagination anastomosis technique are well-established procedures for patients with low rectal cancer. "Dog-ear" invagination anastomosis technique may reduce the incidence of protecting loop ileostomy and significantly affect LARS score, and demonstrate a positive impact on the quality of life after surgery.

摘要

背景

侧方相交边缘(“狗耳”)是双吻合器技术(DST)的一个薄弱点,我们设计了“狗耳”内翻吻合术(DAIA),其可在腹腔镜前切除术时消除“狗耳”。

患者与方法

本研究共纳入202例行择期根治性低位前切除术+DST(n = 143)或低位前切除术+DAIA(n = 59)的患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以尽量减少不良影响。比较低位前切除术+DST与低位前切除术+DAIA之间的临床数据,并分析各因素对总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的影响。

结果

PSM后,53对低位前切除术+DST和低位前切除术+DAIA患者纳入研究。低位前切除术+DAIA组的吻合水平高于低位前切除术+DST组(3.50±1.03 vs. 2.87±1.10,P = 0.01)。与低位前切除术+DST组相比,低位前切除术+DAIA组保护性回肠造口术的发生率更低(20.75% vs. 5.66%,P < 0.05)。术后6个月(严重低位前切除综合征37.74%(n = 20) vs. 67.93%(n = 36);P = 0.007)和12个月(严重低位前切除综合征13.21%(n = 7) vs. 20.37%(n = 11);P = 0.03)时,低位前切除术+DAIA患者的低位前切除综合征发生率低于低位前切除术+DST患者。OS和DFS率相似(P > 0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜低位前切除联合“狗耳”内翻吻合术是低位直肠癌患者成熟的手术方法。“狗耳”内翻吻合术可降低保护性回肠造口术的发生率,并显著影响低位前切除综合征评分,对术后生活质量有积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/5ffdc63ad39a/fsurg-09-1038873-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/87a5b7c1ff69/fsurg-09-1038873-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/3e1768fe296e/fsurg-09-1038873-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/8c14e3208505/fsurg-09-1038873-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/5a22fd9e4a25/fsurg-09-1038873-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/ee7fdbfaea5a/fsurg-09-1038873-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/5ffdc63ad39a/fsurg-09-1038873-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/87a5b7c1ff69/fsurg-09-1038873-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/3e1768fe296e/fsurg-09-1038873-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/8c14e3208505/fsurg-09-1038873-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/5a22fd9e4a25/fsurg-09-1038873-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/ee7fdbfaea5a/fsurg-09-1038873-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd66/9852756/5ffdc63ad39a/fsurg-09-1038873-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with "dog ear" invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis.腹腔镜低位前切除术联合“狗耳”内翻吻合术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1038873. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1038873. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of intracorporeal single-stapled and double-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a case-control study.腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗直肠癌中腔内置钉与双吻合器吻合的对比:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1582-8. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
3
Double-stapled anastomosis without "dog-ears" reduces the anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.无“狗耳”的双吻合器吻合术可减少直肠癌腹腔镜前切除术的吻合口漏:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1003854. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003854. eCollection 2022.
4
Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).比较腹腔镜或机器人低位前切除术与开放手术治疗直肠癌患者的结局:NCDB(2010-2015 年)的倾向匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4754-4771. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07252-5. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
5
[Analysis on prognosis and influencing factors of postoperative low anterior resection syndrome for rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic anus-preserving radical resection].[腹腔镜保肛根治性切除术后直肠癌患者低位前切除综合征的预后及影响因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 25;22(6):573-578. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.06.011.
6
Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection and Eversion Technique Combined With a Nondog Ear Anastomosis for Mid- and Distal Rectal Neoplasms: A Preliminary and Feasibility Study.腹腔镜低位前切除术联合外翻技术及无狗耳吻合术治疗中低位直肠肿瘤:一项初步可行性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(50):e2285. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002285.
7
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.多媒体文章。腹腔镜超低位前切除术联合结肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
8
Long-Term Functional Outcomes of Total Mesorectal Excision Following Chemoradiotherapy for Lower Rectal Cancer: Stapled Anastomosis versus Intersphincteric Resection.低位直肠癌放化疗后全直肠系膜切除的长期功能结局:吻合器吻合与括约肌间切除术对比
Dig Surg. 2016;33(1):33-42. doi: 10.1159/000441571. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
9
b-Shaped Laparoscopic Dual Anastomosis for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Safe and Feasible Technique.b形腹腔镜双吻合术治疗中低位直肠癌:一种安全可行的技术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1174-1179. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0081. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
10
Ultralow Anterior Resection and Coloanal Anastomosis for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: An Appraisal Based on Bowel Function.超低位直肠前切除术和结肠肛管吻合术治疗低位直肠肿瘤:基于肠功能的评估。
Dig Surg. 2019;36(5):409-417. doi: 10.1159/000490899. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of the "dog-ear" during laparoscopic anterior resection with double stapling technique reduces the anastomotic leakage: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜前切除术采用双吻合器技术时切除“狗耳”可减少吻合口漏:一项前瞻性队列研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 18;29(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03178-4.
2
Circular staplers and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: meta-analysis.圆形吻合器与结直肠手术中的吻合口漏:荟萃分析
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae170.
3
Effect of laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcing sutures to prevent anastomotic leakage: A meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study.结直肠吻合口漏定义的共识:一项改良德尔菲研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun 21;26(23):3293-3303. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293.
2
Impact of Long-Course Neoadjuvant Radiation on Postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.长程新辅助放疗对直肠癌术后低位前切除综合征和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的事后分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;26(3):746-755. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07096-8. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life After Sphincter-Sparing Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Long-term Longitudinal Follow-up.
腹腔镜体内加强缝合预防吻合口漏的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Saudi Med J. 2025 Jan;46(1):9-18. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240422.
低位前切除综合征与保肛直肠癌手术后生活质量:一项长期纵向随访研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jan;62(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001228.
4
Quality of life and anterior resection syndrome after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study.中低位直肠癌术后生活质量和前切除综合征:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):1031-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Laparoscopic low anterior resection combined with "dog-ear" invagination anastomosis for mid- and distal rectal cancer.腹腔镜低位前切除术联合“狗耳”内翻吻合术治疗中低位直肠癌
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jan;22(1):65-68. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1727-4. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助切除术与开放性切除术治疗Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期直肠癌对病理结果的影响:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z6051随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529.
7
A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
8
Predictors of fecal incontinence and related quality of life after a total mesorectal excision with primary anastomosis for patients with rectal cancer.直肠癌患者行全直肠系膜切除并一期吻合术后大便失禁及相关生活质量的预测因素
Ann Coloproctol. 2015 Feb;31(1):23-8. doi: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.23. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
9
Endoscopic evaluation of clinical colorectal anastomotic leakage.内镜评估临床结直肠吻合口漏。
J Surg Res. 2015 Jan;193(1):126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
Bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment: a study comparing the specialist's versus patient's perspective.直肠癌治疗后的肠道功能障碍:一项比较专家与患者观点的研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 21;4(1):e003374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003374.