• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用ROI-C装置与钢板椎间融合器行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗创伤性中央脊髓综合征的临床疗效比较

The clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C device vs. plate-cage in managing traumatic central cord syndrome.

作者信息

Song Dawei, Deng Zicheng, Feng Tao, Wang Jinning, Liu Yijie, Wang Heng, Yang Huilin, Niu Junjie

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1055317. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1055317. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.1055317
PMID:36684339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9852637/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with ROI-C device vs. conventional anterior plate and cage system (APCS) in managing traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS).

METHODS

A total of 37 patients diagnosed with TCCS who underwent ACDF with ROI-C implant and APCS were recruited in this retrospective study from June 2012 to February 2020. Radiological parameters and clinical results were recorded and compared through follow-up time. Characteristics of patients and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the procedure well. The average follow-up time was 25.00 ± 7.99 months in the ROI-C group, and 21.29 ± 7.41 months in the APCS group. The blood loss and operation time were significantly lower in the ROI-C group than in the APCS group. Radiological parameters and clinical results were all improved postoperatively and maintained at the final follow-up. Fusion was achieved in all patients. ROI-C group had a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia than the APCS group. Only 1 case of ALD was observed at the final follow-up in the APCS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ROI-C device and APCS demonstrated satisfactory clinical effects and safety in managing symptomatic single-level traumatic central cord syndrome with underlying instability. Both techniques could improve and maintain cervical lordosis and disc height. ROI-C device was related to a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia, shorter operation time, and less blood loss.

摘要

目的

评估采用ROI-C装置的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与传统前路钢板加椎间融合器系统(APCS)治疗创伤性中央脊髓综合征(TCCS)的疗效及并发症。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了2012年6月至2020年2月期间共37例诊断为TCCS并接受了ROI-C植入物和APCS的ACDF治疗的患者。记录并比较随访期间的影像学参数和临床结果。还记录了患者特征及并发症情况。

结果

所有患者对手术耐受性良好。ROI-C组平均随访时间为25.00±7.99个月,APCS组为21.29±7.41个月。ROI-C组的失血量和手术时间显著低于APCS组。术后影像学参数和临床结果均有改善,并在末次随访时得以维持。所有患者均实现融合。ROI-C组术后吞咽困难发生率低于APCS组。APCS组在末次随访时仅观察到1例相邻节段退变(ALD)。

结论

ROI-C装置和APCS在治疗有症状的单节段创伤性中央脊髓综合征伴潜在不稳定方面均显示出令人满意的临床效果和安全性。两种技术均可改善并维持颈椎前凸和椎间盘高度。ROI-C装置与术后吞咽困难发生率较低、手术时间较短及失血量较少相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a0/9852637/2707baaa7e24/fsurg-09-1055317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a0/9852637/7950c52e3ee5/fsurg-09-1055317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a0/9852637/17c50d718f1f/fsurg-09-1055317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a0/9852637/2707baaa7e24/fsurg-09-1055317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a0/9852637/7950c52e3ee5/fsurg-09-1055317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a0/9852637/17c50d718f1f/fsurg-09-1055317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a0/9852637/2707baaa7e24/fsurg-09-1055317-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C device vs. plate-cage in managing traumatic central cord syndrome.采用ROI-C装置与钢板椎间融合器行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗创伤性中央脊髓综合征的临床疗效比较
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1055317. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1055317. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.零轮廓锚定椎间融合器(ROI-C)与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器联合前路钢板用于多节段脊髓型颈椎病前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1881-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4500-x. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
Comparing the Bridge-Type Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) Interbody Fusion Cage System and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with Plating and Cage System in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.桥型零切迹锚定式椎间间隔物(ROI-C)融合 Cage 系统与颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)加钢板 Cage 系统治疗脊髓型颈椎病的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun;14(6):1100-1108. doi: 10.1111/os.13268. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
4
[Comparison of ROI-C and traditional cage with anterior plating for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].[ROI-C与前路钢板联合传统椎间融合器用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;52(6):425-30.
5
Revision Surgery for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration after Initial Anterior Cervical Fusion: Is ROI-C Better than Plate-Cage Construct?初次颈椎前路融合术后症状性邻近节段椎间盘退变的翻修手术:ROI-C 优于板笼型结构?
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Dec 21;2021:6597754. doi: 10.1155/2021/6597754. eCollection 2021.
6
[Efficacy comparison of zero-profile intervertebral fusion and stand-alone interbody cage combined with cage-titanium plate construct in treatment of two-segment skip cervical spondylosis].零切迹椎间融合与单纯椎间融合器联合钛板治疗双节段跳跃型颈椎病的疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 May 24;102(19):1450-1457. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220128-00208.
7
The ROI-C zero-profile anchored spacer for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: biomechanical profile and clinical outcomes.用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的ROI-C零轮廓锚定椎间融合器:生物力学特征及临床疗效
Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Apr 18;10:61-69. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S127133. eCollection 2017.
8
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
9
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer-ROI-C-Fixation and Combined Intervertebral Cage and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center.零切迹锚定式椎间撑开器-ROI-C-Fix 与颈椎前路融合联合椎间融合器治疗颈椎间盘疾病的临床疗效比较:单中心回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Aug 15;27:e931050. doi: 10.12659/MSM.931050.
10
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.使用自锁独立聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与使用椎间融合器和钢板的ACDF治疗三级颈椎退行性脊椎病的比较:一项为期2年随访的回顾性研究
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.脊髓损伤患者吞咽困难的诊断与康复方法:一项系统综述
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;61(1):41-51. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08614-3. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Comparison of the long-term efficacy of ROI-C and conventional cage-plate in treatment of spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation: a retrospective study.ROI-C 与传统 cage-plate 治疗无骨折脱位型脊髓损伤的长期疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 25;25(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07985-y.
3
Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Spondylotic traumatic central cord syndrome: a hidden discoligamentous injury?骨赘性创伤性中央索综合征:一种隐匿性椎间盘韧带损伤?
Eur Spine J. 2019 Feb;28(2):434-441. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5796-5. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Operative strategy and clinical outcomes of ROI-C(TM) fusion device in the treatment of Hangman's fracture.ROI-C(TM)融合器治疗枢椎椎弓根骨折的手术策略及临床疗效
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):18665-72. eCollection 2015.
3
Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?
自锁式独立 cage 与 cage-plate 固定在单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的比较:一项至少 2 年随访的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 2;18(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03885-4.
零轮廓锚定椎间融合器作为颈椎前路钢板是否能提供额外的稳定性?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):E563-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000864.
4
A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques.用于多节段颈椎前路椎间融合的零轮廓锚定间隔器:与现有固定技术的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 1;40(7):E375-80. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000768.
5
The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.零切迹椎间融合器在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的应用
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jan;24(1):148-54. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3628-9. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
6
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C peek cage: cervical alignment and patient outcomes.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合ROI-C聚醚醚酮椎间融合器:颈椎对线及患者预后
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23 Suppl 6:650-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3553-y. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
7
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
8
Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后沉降的危险因素:术前颈椎排列的意义
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 15;39(16):1280-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000400.
9
Acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a comprehensive review.急性创伤性中央脊髓综合征:全面综述
Neurochirurgie. 2014 Feb-Apr;60(1-2):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
10
Do stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis?带有一体式螺钉的独立椎间融合器能否为多节段颈椎融合提供足够的节段稳定性?
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Jan 23.