Stabler Lorna, Evans Rhiannon, Scourfield Jonathan, Morgan Fiona, Weightman Alison, Willis Simone, Searchfield Lydia, Meindl Mel, Wood Sophie, Nurmatov Ulugbek, Kemp Alison, Forrester Donald, Brand Sarah L
Children's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.
Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cathays, CF10 3BD, UK.
Br J Soc Work. 2021 Nov 9;52(5):2515-2536. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcab213. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Identifying which approaches can effectively reduce the need for out-of-home care for children is critically important. Despite the proliferation of different interventions and approaches globally, evidence summaries on this topic are limited. This study is a scoping review using a realist framework to explore what research evidence exists about reducing the number of children and young people in care. Searches of databases and websites were used to identify studies evaluating intervention effect on at least one of the following outcomes: reduction in initial entry to care; increase in family reunification post care. Data extracted from papers included type of study, outcome, type and level of intervention, effect, mechanism and moderator, implementation issues and economic (EMMIE) considerations. Data were coded by: primary outcome; level of intervention (community, policy, organisation, family or child); and type of evidence, using the realist EMMIE framework. This is the first example of a scoping review on any topic using this framework. Evaluated interventions were grouped and analysed according to system-level mechanism. We present the spread of evidence across system-level mechanisms and an overview of how each system-level mechanism might reduce the number of children in care. Implications and gaps are identified.
确定哪些方法能够有效减少儿童接受院外照料的需求至关重要。尽管全球范围内不同的干预措施和方法层出不穷,但关于这一主题的证据总结却很有限。本研究是一项范围综述,采用现实主义框架来探究现有哪些关于减少受照料儿童和青少年数量的研究证据。通过检索数据库和网站来识别评估干预措施对以下至少一项结果的影响的研究:减少初次进入照料机构的人数;增加照料后家庭团聚的比例。从论文中提取的数据包括研究类型、结果、干预措施的类型和层面、效果、机制和调节因素、实施问题以及经济(EMMIE)考量。数据按照主要结果、干预层面(社区、政策、组织、家庭或儿童)以及证据类型进行编码,采用现实主义EMMIE框架。这是使用该框架对任何主题进行范围综述的首个实例。根据系统层面机制对评估的干预措施进行分组和分析。我们展示了证据在系统层面机制中的分布情况,以及每个系统层面机制可能如何减少受照料儿童数量的概述。同时识别了其中的影响和差距。