Sidiropoulou Zacharoula, Vasconcelos Ana, Couceiro Cristiana, Santos Carlos, Araujo Ana Virginia, Alegre Inês, Santos Cláudia, Campos Costa Filipa, Cardoso Diogo, Cardoso Vasco, Sampaio Rita, Cardoso Fátima, Gascón Pere
Breast Unit, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, PRT.
Doctoral School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, ESP.
Cureus. 2022 Dec 21;14(12):e32776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32776. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Background This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of imaging-detected silent breast cancer in females, with the hypothesis that the incidence of imaging-detected silent breast cancer in females is greater than the true disease incidence. The main purpose of this study is the attempt to prove whether breast imaging can identify silent breast cancers that apparently are common in serial histology analysis. Methodology A series of 217 consecutive medicolegal autopsies on fresh Portuguese cadavers were performed from July 2016 to December 2019 at the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Science, Lisbon, Portugal. The criteria for exclusion were age younger than 40 years, the autopsy performed in less than 48 hours after death, any major injury to one or both breasts, and known or clinically evident breast cancer. Once the eligibility criteria were met, and the sample collection authorization was obtained, a bilateral subcutaneous modi-fied radical mastectomy was performed in each fresh cadaver at the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Science. Mammography, ecography, and excisional biopsies of suspect areas were conducted on the collected samples. Results The indication for excisional biopsy by imaging was assigned in eight cases, and no breast cancer was discovered in the excised specimens. Conclusions In light of the findings, it cannot be concluded that the imaging-detected silent breast cancer prevalence is higher than the actual incidence of the disease, so the author's initial hypothesis was rejected. Mammography does not overdiagnose breast cancer. Benign breast alterations are common, accounting for 43.6% of the corpses collected, while low-suspicion alterations were discovered in 1.84% of breast samples. The objective examination, which included inspection and palpation, missed 37.5% of the biopsied breast changes. This finding indicated that an objective examination leads to a significant number of false-negative results which cannot be used as a screening method.
背景 本研究旨在评估女性中影像学检测到的隐匿性乳腺癌的患病率,假设是女性中影像学检测到的隐匿性乳腺癌的发病率高于实际疾病发病率。本研究的主要目的是试图证明乳腺成像是否能够识别出在系列组织学分析中显然常见的隐匿性乳腺癌。方法 2016年7月至2019年12月期间,在葡萄牙里斯本国家法医学和法医学研究所对217例连续的葡萄牙新鲜尸体进行了法医解剖。排除标准为年龄小于40岁、在死亡后不到48小时内进行的尸检、一侧或双侧乳房有任何重大损伤以及已知或临床明显的乳腺癌。一旦符合入选标准并获得样本采集授权,就在国家法医学和法医学研究所对每具新鲜尸体进行双侧皮下改良根治性乳房切除术。对采集的样本进行了乳房X线摄影、超声检查以及对可疑区域的切除活检。结果 影像学检查指示进行切除活检的有8例,切除标本中未发现乳腺癌。结论 根据研究结果,不能得出影像学检测到的隐匿性乳腺癌患病率高于该疾病实际发病率的结论,因此作者最初的假设被否定。乳房X线摄影不会过度诊断乳腺癌。良性乳腺病变很常见,占所收集尸体的43.6%,而在1.84%的乳腺样本中发现了低度可疑病变。包括视诊和触诊在内的客观检查遗漏了37.5%的活检乳腺病变。这一发现表明,客观检查会导致大量假阴性结果,不能用作筛查方法。