• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Divergences between the European Union and China on reducing international aviation emissions.欧盟与中国在减少国际航空排放问题上的分歧。
Asia Eur J. 2023;21(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10308-023-00657-x. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Civil aviation emissions in Argentina.阿根廷的民航排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161675. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161675. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
3
The new CORSIA baseline has limited motivation to promote the green recovery of global aviation.新的 CORSIA 基线对推动全球航空业绿色复苏的动力有限。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Nov 15;289:117833. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117833. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Direct carbon dioxide emissions from civil aircraft.民用飞机的直接二氧化碳排放。
Atmos Environ (1994). 2014 Oct;95:214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.042. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
5
Greenhouse gas emissions trends and drivers insights from the domestic aviation in Thailand.泰国国内航空温室气体排放趋势及驱动因素洞察
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 9;10(2):e24206. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24206. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
6
Trends on current and forecasted aircraft hybrid electric architectures and their impact on environment.当前及预测的飞机混合电动架构趋势及其对环境的影响。
Energy (Oxf). 2020 Nov 15;211:118814. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118814. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Initial Long-Term Scenarios for COVID-19's Impact on Aviation and Implications for Climate Policy.新冠疫情对航空业影响的初步长期情景及对气候政策的启示
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):204-218. doi: 10.1177/03611981211045067. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
Estimating induced land use change emissions for sustainable aviation biofuel pathways.估算可持续航空生物燃料途径的引致土地使用变化排放量。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 20;779:146238. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146238. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
Unprecedented Impacts of Aviation Emissions on Global Environmental and Climate Change Scenario.航空排放对全球环境和气候变化情景的前所未有的影响。
Curr Pollut Rep. 2021;7(4):549-564. doi: 10.1007/s40726-021-00206-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
10
International aviation emissions to 2025: Can emissions be stabilised without restricting demand?到2025年的国际航空排放:在不限制需求的情况下排放能否稳定?
Energy Policy. 2009 Jan;37(1):264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.029. Epub 2008 Oct 19.

欧盟与中国在减少国际航空排放问题上的分歧。

Divergences between the European Union and China on reducing international aviation emissions.

作者信息

Mai Duong Thi Thuy, Yan Bo

机构信息

Faculty of East Asian Studies, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

School of International Relations and Public Affairs (SIRPA), Fudan University, Room 704, Wenke Building, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Asia Eur J. 2023;21(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10308-023-00657-x. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10308-023-00657-x
PMID:36686969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9838422/
Abstract

This paper provides a historical overview regarding the emergence, development and deepening of divergences between the European Union (EU) and the People's Republic of China (China) in reducing global aviation emissions. It focuses on their divergences on three specific issues, i.e. under which framework to tackle global aviation emissions, whether and how to reflect the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC) principle in the design and implementation of the global market-based measures (MBMs) for international aviation and which role the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) should play in offsetting these emissions. Besides, this paper explains the driving forces behind these divergences by examining both normative and economic-related factors, which have formed different stances of both sides. From a Chinese perspective, considerations about the issues of state sovereignty, fairness regarding burden sharing in tackling climate change, the development of China's aviation and aircraft manufacturing and its limited capability in promoting the large-scale SAF deployment help explain its hardline stance on reducing global aviation emissions. As for the EU, perceptions of its leading role in the global climate governance and the CBDR-RC principle, the targets of strengthening the EU ETS role in the global carbon market, and the competitiveness of the European airlines are underlying reasons behind its attempt to include the international aviation under its ETS. Moreover, the EU member states' support to the ICAO can be explained through the conformity between the emissions offsetting objectives under this organisation and the EU's current climate policies.

摘要

本文提供了关于欧盟(EU)与中华人民共和国(中国)在减少全球航空排放方面分歧的出现、发展和深化的历史概述。它聚焦于双方在三个具体问题上的分歧,即在哪个框架下应对全球航空排放、在国际航空基于全球市场的措施(MBMs)的设计和实施中是否以及如何体现共同但有区别的责任和各自能力(CBDR-RC)原则,以及国际民用航空组织(ICAO)在抵消这些排放方面应发挥何种作用。此外,本文通过审视规范和经济相关因素来解释这些分歧背后的驱动力,这些因素形成了双方不同的立场。从中国的角度来看,对国家主权问题、应对气候变化中负担分担的公平性、中国航空和飞机制造的发展以及其在推动大规模可持续航空燃料(SAF)部署方面的有限能力的考量,有助于解释其在减少全球航空排放问题上的强硬立场。至于欧盟,其对在全球气候治理中的主导作用和CBDR-RC原则的认知、加强欧盟排放交易体系(EU ETS)在全球碳市场作用的目标以及欧洲航空公司的竞争力,是其试图将国际航空纳入其排放交易体系的潜在原因。此外,欧盟成员国对国际民航组织的支持可以通过该组织的排放抵消目标与欧盟当前气候政策的一致性来解释。