Mai Duong Thi Thuy, Yan Bo
Faculty of East Asian Studies, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
School of International Relations and Public Affairs (SIRPA), Fudan University, Room 704, Wenke Building, Shanghai, China.
Asia Eur J. 2023;21(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10308-023-00657-x. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
This paper provides a historical overview regarding the emergence, development and deepening of divergences between the European Union (EU) and the People's Republic of China (China) in reducing global aviation emissions. It focuses on their divergences on three specific issues, i.e. under which framework to tackle global aviation emissions, whether and how to reflect the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC) principle in the design and implementation of the global market-based measures (MBMs) for international aviation and which role the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) should play in offsetting these emissions. Besides, this paper explains the driving forces behind these divergences by examining both normative and economic-related factors, which have formed different stances of both sides. From a Chinese perspective, considerations about the issues of state sovereignty, fairness regarding burden sharing in tackling climate change, the development of China's aviation and aircraft manufacturing and its limited capability in promoting the large-scale SAF deployment help explain its hardline stance on reducing global aviation emissions. As for the EU, perceptions of its leading role in the global climate governance and the CBDR-RC principle, the targets of strengthening the EU ETS role in the global carbon market, and the competitiveness of the European airlines are underlying reasons behind its attempt to include the international aviation under its ETS. Moreover, the EU member states' support to the ICAO can be explained through the conformity between the emissions offsetting objectives under this organisation and the EU's current climate policies.
本文提供了关于欧盟(EU)与中华人民共和国(中国)在减少全球航空排放方面分歧的出现、发展和深化的历史概述。它聚焦于双方在三个具体问题上的分歧,即在哪个框架下应对全球航空排放、在国际航空基于全球市场的措施(MBMs)的设计和实施中是否以及如何体现共同但有区别的责任和各自能力(CBDR-RC)原则,以及国际民用航空组织(ICAO)在抵消这些排放方面应发挥何种作用。此外,本文通过审视规范和经济相关因素来解释这些分歧背后的驱动力,这些因素形成了双方不同的立场。从中国的角度来看,对国家主权问题、应对气候变化中负担分担的公平性、中国航空和飞机制造的发展以及其在推动大规模可持续航空燃料(SAF)部署方面的有限能力的考量,有助于解释其在减少全球航空排放问题上的强硬立场。至于欧盟,其对在全球气候治理中的主导作用和CBDR-RC原则的认知、加强欧盟排放交易体系(EU ETS)在全球碳市场作用的目标以及欧洲航空公司的竞争力,是其试图将国际航空纳入其排放交易体系的潜在原因。此外,欧盟成员国对国际民航组织的支持可以通过该组织的排放抵消目标与欧盟当前气候政策的一致性来解释。