Yuan Shupei, Rui Jian, Peng Xu
Department of Communication, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, 60008, USA.
Department of New Media and Communication, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Feb 15;86:103539. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103539. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
When we recognize various factors which influence vaccine willingness, it is unclear whether these factors work the same in different countries. This study explored how trust in scientists was related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancies and vaccine willingness in China and the U.S. We attempted to understand the extent to which the perceived trustworthiness of scientists would predict vaccine hesitancies and intention to get vaccinated differently in these two countries. An online survey with participants in China (N = 391) and in the U.S. (N = 363) was conducted. Participants were asked about their view of scientists' competence, benevolence, and integrity as dimensions of trustworthiness, three types of vaccine hesitancies, as well as their willingness to get vaccinated. The results showed that trust in scientists was negatively related to individual vaccine hesitancy in both China and the U.S., and trust was negatively associated with the level of contextual hesitancy and vaccine-specific hesitancy in the U.S. Higher trust in scientists was also associated with the willingness to get vaccines in the U.S., rather than in China. Results yielded differences in China and the U.S. in how trust in scientists and vaccine hesitancies predicted individuals' willingness to get vaccinated.
当我们认识到影响疫苗接种意愿的各种因素时,尚不清楚这些因素在不同国家是否发挥相同的作用。本研究探讨了在中国和美国,对科学家的信任与对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度及接种意愿之间的关系。我们试图了解在这两个国家,科学家的可信度在多大程度上会对疫苗犹豫态度和接种意愿产生不同的预测作用。对中国的391名参与者和美国的363名参与者进行了在线调查。参与者被问及他们对科学家在可信度方面的能力、善意和正直的看法,三种疫苗犹豫态度类型,以及他们的接种意愿。结果表明,在中国和美国,对科学家的信任与个体的疫苗犹豫态度均呈负相关,在美国,信任与背景犹豫程度和疫苗特定犹豫程度也呈负相关。在美国,对科学家的更高信任也与接种疫苗的意愿相关,而在中国并非如此。研究结果表明,在中国和美国,对科学家的信任和疫苗犹豫态度对个体接种意愿的预测方式存在差异。