Weglinski Caroline, Jeans Alexander
Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QT, U.K.
Neuronal Signal. 2023 Jan 6;7(1):NS20220086. doi: 10.1042/NS20220086. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The amyloid hypothesis, which proposes that accumulation of the peptide amyloid-β at synapses is the key driver of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, has been the dominant idea in the field of Alzheimer's research for nearly 30 years. Recently, however, serious doubts about its validity have emerged, largely motivated by disappointing results from anti-amyloid therapeutics in clinical trials. As a result, much of the AD research effort has shifted to understanding the roles of a variety of other entities implicated in pathogenesis, such as microglia, astrocytes, apolipoprotein E and several others. All undoubtedly play an important role, but the nature of this has in many cases remained unclear, partly due to their pleiotropic functions. Here, we propose that all of these AD-related entities share at least one overlapping function, which is the local regulation of amyloid-β levels, and that this may be critical to their role in AD pathogenesis. We also review what is currently known of the actions of amyloid-β at the synapse in health and disease, and consider in particular how it might interact with the key AD-associated protein tau in the disease setting. There is much compelling evidence in support of the amyloid hypothesis; rather than detract from this, the implication of many disparate AD-associated cell types, molecules and processes in the regulation of amyloid-β levels may lend further support.
淀粉样蛋白假说认为,肽类淀粉样β蛋白在突触处的积累是阿尔茨海默病(AD)发病机制的关键驱动因素,近30年来一直是阿尔茨海默病研究领域的主导观点。然而,最近人们对其有效性产生了严重怀疑,这主要是由于抗淀粉样蛋白疗法在临床试验中令人失望的结果。因此,许多AD研究工作已转向了解与发病机制相关的多种其他因素的作用,如小胶质细胞、星形胶质细胞、载脂蛋白E等。毫无疑问,它们都发挥着重要作用,但在许多情况下,其作用的本质仍不清楚,部分原因是它们具有多效性功能。在此,我们提出所有这些与AD相关的因素至少具有一个重叠功能,即对淀粉样β蛋白水平的局部调节,并且这可能对它们在AD发病机制中的作用至关重要。我们还回顾了目前已知的淀粉样β蛋白在健康和疾病状态下在突触处的作用,特别考虑了在疾病背景下它可能如何与关键的AD相关蛋白tau相互作用。有许多令人信服的证据支持淀粉样蛋白假说;许多不同的与AD相关的细胞类型、分子和过程参与淀粉样β蛋白水平的调节,这并非是对该假说的贬低,反而可能提供进一步的支持。