Liu Dan, Zhang Yuan, Geng Xiaowei
School of Educational Science, Ludong University, Yantai, China.
Institute for Education and Treatment of Problematic Youth, Ludong University, Yantai, China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1076304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1076304. eCollection 2022.
Intertemporal choice refers to decisions involving tradeoffs among costs and benefits occurred at different times. To investigate whether college students' intertemporal decision making under the gain and loss frames is affected by their chronic regulatory focus. Currently, experiment 1 investigated the influence of college students' chronic regulatory focus on intertemporal decision making under the gain and loss frames, and experiment 2 further explored the moderating effect of social comparison (i.e., upward or downward social comparison) during this process. The results showed that intertemporal choices of participants with promotive focus was no significant difference between the gain frame and loss frame, while college students with preventive focus chose later and larger rewards more in loss frame than in gain frame. Social comparison moderated the effects of the chronic regulatory focus on college students' intertemporal choice in gain and loss frames. The upward comparison enhanced the influence of regulatory focus on intertemporal choice in the gain and loss frames, while the downward comparison weakened it.
跨期选择是指涉及在不同时间发生的成本和收益之间进行权衡的决策。为了研究大学生在得失框架下的跨期决策是否受到其长期调节焦点的影响。目前,实验1研究了大学生长期调节焦点对得失框架下跨期决策的影响,实验2进一步探讨了在此过程中社会比较(即向上或向下社会比较)的调节作用。结果表明,促进型焦点的参与者在收益框架和损失框架下的跨期选择没有显著差异,而预防型焦点的大学生在损失框架下比在收益框架下更多地选择延迟且更大的奖励。社会比较调节了长期调节焦点对大学生在得失框架下跨期选择的影响。向上比较增强了调节焦点对得失框架下跨期选择的影响,而向下比较则削弱了这种影响。