Department of Psychology, Box 407, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA 17325, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Aug;99(2):215-31. doi: 10.1037/a0019715.
Four studies demonstrate the importance of self-regulatory mechanisms for understanding risk-seeking behavior under loss. Findings suggest that risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity under 3 conditions: (a) when an individual is in a state of loss; (b) when the individual is in a prevention-focused regulatory state (E. T. Higgins, 1997); and (c) when the risky option alone offers the possibility of eliminating loss. In situations involving loss, prevention motivation but not promotion motivation (whether measured or manipulated) was uniquely associated with behaviors that served the motivation to maintain the status quo. When the risky option offered the sole possibility of returning to the status quo, prevention motivation predicted increased risk seeking. However, when a more conservative option was available that also offered the possibility to return to the status quo, prevention motivation predicted risk aversion. When neither option offered the possibility to return to the status quo, prevention motivation was not associated with risky choice. The authors discuss the benefits of complementing existing accounts of risky decision making under loss with regulatory focus motivational mechanisms.
四项研究证明了自我调节机制对于理解损失下的风险寻求行为的重要性。研究结果表明,在三种情况下,风险寻求成为一种必要的动机:(a)当个体处于损失状态时;(b)当个体处于预防为重点的调节状态时(E.T. Higgins,1997);(c)当只有风险选项提供消除损失的可能性时。在涉及损失的情况下,预防动机而不是促进动机(无论是测量还是操纵)与那些旨在维持现状的行为具有独特的关联。当风险选项提供了唯一回到现状的可能性时,预防动机预示着风险寻求的增加。然而,当有一个更保守的选项也提供了回到现状的可能性时,预防动机预示着风险规避。当没有选项提供回到现状的可能性时,预防动机与风险选择无关。作者讨论了用调节焦点动机机制补充现有损失下风险决策理论的好处。