Gilman Jodi M, Curran Max T, Calderon Vanessa, Stoeckel Luke E, Evins A Eden
Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 2;9(7):e101570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101570. eCollection 2014.
Adolescents and young adults who affiliate with friends who engage in impulsive behavior are more likely to engage in impulsive behaviors themselves, and those who associate with prosocial (i.e. more prudent, future oriented) peers are more likely to engage in prosocial behavior. However, it is difficult to disentangle the contribution of peer influence vs. peer selection (i.e., whether individuals choose friends with similar traits) when interpreting social behaviors. In this study, we combined a novel social manipulation with a well-validated delay discounting task assessing impulsive behavior to create a social influence delay discounting task, in which participants were exposed to both impulsive (smaller, sooner or SS payment) and non-impulsive (larger, later or LL payment) choices from their peers. Young adults in this sample, n = 51, aged 18-25 had a higher rate of SS choices after exposure to impulsive peer influence than after exposure to non-impulsive peer influence. Interestingly, in highly susceptible individuals, the rate of non-impulsive choices did not increase after exposure to non-impulsive influence. There was a positive correlation between self-reported suggestibility and degree of peer influence on SS choices. These results suggest that, in young adults, SS choices appear to be influenced by the choices of same-aged peers, especially for individuals who are highly susceptible to influence.
与有冲动行为的朋友交往的青少年和年轻人自己更有可能做出冲动行为,而与亲社会(即更谨慎、更着眼于未来)同伴交往的人则更有可能做出亲社会行为。然而,在解释社会行为时,很难区分同伴影响与同伴选择(即个体是否选择具有相似特质的朋友)的作用。在本研究中,我们将一种新颖的社会操纵与一项经过充分验证的评估冲动行为的延迟折扣任务相结合,创建了一个社会影响延迟折扣任务,其中参与者会接触到来自同伴的冲动选择(较小、较早或SS支付)和非冲动选择(较大、较晚或LL支付)。该样本中有51名年龄在18至25岁之间的年轻人,在受到冲动同伴影响后,选择SS的比例高于受到非冲动同伴影响后。有趣的是,在高度易受影响的个体中,接触非冲动影响后,非冲动选择的比例并未增加。自我报告的易受暗示性与同伴对SS选择的影响程度之间存在正相关。这些结果表明,在年轻人中,SS选择似乎受到同龄同伴选择的影响,尤其是对于那些高度易受影响的个体。