Cano-Gutierrez Julio César, Pérez-Morán Juan Carlos, Bernal-Baldenebro Brando, Arenas-Meneses Daniela, Vazquez-Lira Ramsés, Olguín-Tiznado Jesús Everardo
Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Design, Autonomous University of Baja California, Ensenada, Mexico.
Promoter Network of Diagnostic Evaluation Methods and Educational Innovation, Mexico City, Mexico.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1022707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022707. eCollection 2022.
The primary objective of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the (IIA-PRF) of Reference Guide III proposed in NOM-035-STPS-2018. A total of 2,149 workers in Baja California, Mexico's and sectors, were administered an online inventory version. Preliminary analyses were performed, as well as a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) based on two models proposed by the standard itself: an eight-factor model (8-FM) and a four-factor model (4-FM). Likewise, based on the results and with the recommendations of the specialists, a threefactor model (3-FM) was proposed. In addition, nested model sequencing methods were subsequently applied to validate the invariance between the origin of the activity. The dimensionality of 3-FM was found to have adequate fit values according to a-priori established criteria. It is concluded that the IIAPRF does not have the reliability and validity parameters necessary to support interpretations, uses and consequences based on the theoretical structure established by NOM-035-STPS-2018 and that, although the 3-FM presents better reliability and validity indices, it is not invariant in terms of the origin of the activity. Finally, we discuss the implications and recommend reviewing and adjusting the design of the IIAPRF items to extend the measurement of invariance to other groups of relevance for decision making in the improvement of the work environment.
本研究的主要目的是分析NOM-035-STPS-2018中提出的参考指南III的(IIA-PRF)心理测量特性。对墨西哥下加利福尼亚州的2149名工人以及 部门进行了在线问卷版本的调查。进行了初步分析,并基于标准本身提出的两个模型进行了验证性因素分析(CFA):一个八因素模型(8-FM)和一个四因素模型(4-FM)。同样,根据结果并在专家建议的基础上,提出了一个三因素模型(3-FM)。此外,随后应用嵌套模型排序方法来验证活动来源之间的不变性。根据先验确定的标准,发现3-FM的维度具有足够的拟合值。得出的结论是,IIAPRF不具备支持基于NOM-035-STPS-2018建立的理论结构进行解释、使用和得出结论所需的可靠性和有效性参数,并且,尽管3-FM呈现出更好的可靠性和有效性指标,但在活动来源方面并非不变。最后,我们讨论了其影响,并建议审查和调整IIAPRF项目的设计,以将不变性的测量扩展到对改善工作环境决策具有相关性的其他群体。