• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响斑秃治疗决策的因素:一项定性评估。

Factors influencing alopecia areata treatment decisions: A qualitative assessment.

作者信息

Han Jane J, Faletsky Adam, Ghatnekar Shilpa, Lee Karen J, Pérez-Chada Lourdes M, Li Sara J, Manjaly Priya, Senna Maryanne M, Huang Kathie P, Mostaghimi Arash

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois.

出版信息

JAAD Int. 2022 Nov 4;10:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.10.007. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdin.2022.10.007
PMID:36688102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9850169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease of hair loss in which patients may benefit from comprehensive understanding of AA's disease process and therapeutic options during treatment decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

Determine factors influencing patients' AA treatment decision-making.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted using semi-structured interview guides. Interviews were coded using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one participants with AA were interviewed. Coding interrater reliability was κ = 0.87-0.91, indicating strong-almost perfect agreement. Participants faced multiple barriers, including lack of access to health care ( = 10, 47.6%) and lack of transparency about their condition and treatment options ( = 9, 42.9%). Information about AA was sought from primarily the internet ( = 15, 71.4%) and physician recommendation ( = 15, 71.4%). When choosing AA treatments, patients often considered treatment efficacy ( = 21, 100%), safety ( = 21, 100%), and convenience of use ( = 20, 95.2%).

LIMITATIONS

Referral and regional biases may be present and limit generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AA face various challenges including medical uncertainty and lack of information. Patients need trustworthy and accessible sources of information regarding their treatment that also take into consideration their preferences and values.

摘要

背景

斑秃(AA)是一种脱发疾病,患者在治疗决策过程中若能全面了解斑秃的疾病进程和治疗选择,可能会从中受益。

目的

确定影响患者斑秃治疗决策的因素。

方法

使用半结构化访谈指南进行定性访谈。采用归纳主题分析法对访谈进行编码。

结果

对21名斑秃患者进行了访谈。编码者间信度κ = 0.87 - 0.91,表明一致性很强——几乎完全一致。参与者面临多种障碍,包括难以获得医疗服务(n = 10,47.6%)以及对自身病情和治疗选择缺乏透明度(n = 9,42.9%)。关于斑秃的信息主要来自互联网(n = 15,71.4%)和医生推荐(n = 15,71.4%)。在选择斑秃治疗方法时,患者通常会考虑治疗效果(n = 21,100%)、安全性(n = 21,100%)和使用便利性(n = 20,95.2%)。

局限性

可能存在转诊和地区偏差,限制了研究结果的普遍性。

结论

斑秃患者面临各种挑战,包括医疗不确定性和信息匮乏。患者需要关于其治疗的可靠且易于获取的信息来源,这些信息还应考虑到他们的偏好和价值观。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bdd/9850169/5c95c0c98cd2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bdd/9850169/5c95c0c98cd2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bdd/9850169/5c95c0c98cd2/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors influencing alopecia areata treatment decisions: A qualitative assessment.影响斑秃治疗决策的因素:一项定性评估。
JAAD Int. 2022 Nov 4;10:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.10.007. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Physician values in alopecia areata treatment decision-making: A qualitative assessment.斑秃治疗决策中的医生价值观:一项定性评估。
JAAD Int. 2022 Dec 30;11:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.11.010. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Analysis of alopecia areata surveys suggests a threshold for improved patient-reported outcomes.斑秃调查分析表明,存在一个改善患者报告结局的阈值。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Oct;187(4):539-547. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21696. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
Dermatologist and Patient Perceptions of Treatment Success in Alopecia Areata and Evaluation of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Japan.日本皮肤科医生和患者对斑秃治疗成功率的看法及临床疗效评估
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Apr;11(2):433-447. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00477-6. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
5
Patient-Reported Burden of Severe Alopecia Areata: First Results from the Multinational Alopecia Areata Unmet Need Survey.患者报告的重度斑秃负担:多国斑秃未满足需求调查的初步结果
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Mar 29;17:751-761. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S445646. eCollection 2024.
6
Validation of the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Questionnaire in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata.斑秃患者优先结局(AAPPO)问卷在成人和青少年斑秃患者中的验证
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Jan;12(1):149-166. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00648-z. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
7
Development of the alopecia areata symptom impact scale.斑秃症状影响量表的编制
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2013 Dec;16(1):S51-2. doi: 10.1038/jidsymp.2013.19.
8
A qualitative interview study to explore adolescents' experience of alopecia areata and the content validity of sign/symptom patient-reported outcome measures.一项质性访谈研究,旨在探究青少年斑秃的经历以及体征/症状患者报告结局指标的内容效度。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 May;186(5):849-860. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20904. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
9
Characterizing the relationships between patient-reported outcomes and clinician assessments of alopecia areata in a phase 2a randomized trial of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib.在一项关于 ritlecitinib 和 brepocitinib 的 2a 期随机试验中,描述斑秃患者报告结局与临床医生评估之间的关系。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Apr;36(4):602-609. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17909. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
10
Quality of life measurement in alopecia areata. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes.斑秃患者生活质量的评估。欧洲皮肤病学会和性病学会生活质量和以患者为中心结局工作组的立场声明。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Aug;35(8):1614-1621. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17370. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of SALT score severity in correlation with trichoscopic findings in alopecia areata: a study of 303 patients.斑秃中SALT评分严重程度与毛发镜检查结果的相关性评估:一项对303例患者的研究
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Mar 7;317(1):523. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04026-z.
2
Regulates the PTPRF/β-Catenin Axis in Hair Follicle Development: Insights into the Pathogenic Mechanism of Alopecia Areata.调控毛发发育中的 PTPRF/β-连环蛋白轴:斑秃发病机制的新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 18;24(24):17632. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417632.

本文引用的文献

1
The Utility and Validity of the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale in Measuring Disease-Related Symptoms and their Effect on Functioning.斑秃症状影响量表在测量疾病相关症状及其对功能的影响方面的效用和效度。
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2018 Jan;19(1):S41-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.jisp.2017.10.009.
2
Alopecia areata: An appraisal of new treatment approaches and overview of current therapies.斑秃:新治疗方法的评估及现有疗法概述。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan;78(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.1142.
3
Shared decision making and patient decision aids in dermatology.
皮肤病学中的共同决策和患者决策辅助工具。
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Nov;175(5):1045-1048. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14803.
4
The doctor-patient relationship as a toolkit for uncertain clinical decisions.医患关系作为应对不确定临床决策的一种手段。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;159:108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
A study of Internet searches for medical information in dermatology patients: The patient-physician relationship.一项关于皮肤科患者互联网医学信息搜索情况的研究:医患关系。
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015 Jul-Aug;106(6):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
6
Navigating the unknown: shared decision-making in the face of uncertainty.探索未知:面对不确定性时的共同决策。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):675-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3074-8.
7
Interviewing to develop Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures for clinical research: eliciting patients' experience.为临床研究制定患者报告结局(PRO)指标的访谈:获取患者的体验
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Feb 5;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-15.
8
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.