Oddo Vanessa M, Jones-Smith Jessica C, Knox Melissa A
University of Illinois Chicago, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb;31:102113. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102113. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
This study aimed to investigate the association between changes in employment precarity and changes in health amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted an online survey of 623 U.S. adults at-risk for cardiovascular disease, which queried respondents on employment, food insecurity, and blood pressure measurements in the Fall of 2020 and retrospectively, in February 2020. Respondents were also queried on perceived stress in the Fall of 2020. We created a multidimensional precarious employment score (PES) using 13 survey indicators, that operationalized the following dimensions of employment precarity (PES range: 0-13): material rewards, working time arrangements, employment stability, workers' rights, collective organization, interpersonal relations, and training opportunities. Using adjusted linear regression models, we investigated the association between a change in the PES and 1) change in systolic blood pressure, 2) change in pulse pressure, 3) change in food insecurity, and 4) perceived stress. Models controlled for race/ethnicity, age, gender, and education. Results indicated that employment precarity was 13 % higher between February and Fall 2020, particularly among women and non-Hispanic Black respondents. A change in the PES was associated with a change in food insecurity ( : 0.02; 95 % CI:0.01, 0.03) and higher perceived stress ( : 0.39; 95 % CI:0.25, 0.53). The PES was not associated with a change in systolic blood pressure ( : -0.22; 95 % CI:-0.76, 0.32) nor in pulse pressure ( : -0.33; 95 % CI: -0.73, 0.07). Policy approaches to mitigate the growth in employment precarity, and in turn food insecurity and stress, warrant consideration to prevent widening of health inequities.
本研究旨在调查在新冠疫情期间就业不稳定状况的变化与健康变化之间的关联。我们对623名有心血管疾病风险的美国成年人进行了一项在线调查,询问了受访者在2020年秋季以及回顾性地在2020年2月的就业、粮食不安全和血压测量情况。还询问了受访者在2020年秋季的感知压力。我们使用13个调查指标创建了一个多维不稳定就业得分(PES),该得分将就业不稳定的以下维度进行了量化(PES范围:0 - 13):物质回报、工作时间安排、就业稳定性、工人权利、集体组织、人际关系和培训机会。使用调整后的线性回归模型,我们研究了PES的变化与以下方面的关联:1)收缩压变化;2)脉压变化;3)粮食不安全变化;4)感知压力。模型对种族/族裔、年龄、性别和教育程度进行了控制。结果表明,2020年2月至秋季期间就业不稳定状况增加了13%,尤其是女性和非西班牙裔黑人受访者。PES的变化与粮食不安全的变化(β:0.02;95%置信区间:0.01,0.03)以及更高的感知压力(β:0.39;95%置信区间:0.25,0.53)相关。PES与收缩压变化(β: - 0.22;95%置信区间: - 0.76,0.32)和脉压变化(β: - 0.33;95%置信区间: - 0.73,0.07)均无关联。减轻就业不稳定状况增长进而减轻粮食不安全和压力的政策措施值得考虑,以防止健康不平等的加剧。