• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用多级因子分析和项目反应理论,为美国和中国的客户与治疗师开发一份简短工作联盟量表。

The development of a Brief Working Alliance Inventory for clients and therapists using multilevel factor analysis and item response theory in the United States and China.

作者信息

Li Xu, Zhao Hongyang, Wu Manxuan, Li Feihan, Hill Clara E

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology.

Faculty of Psychology.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2023 Mar;70(2):172-188. doi: 10.1037/cou0000655. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1037/cou0000655
PMID:36689385
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the multilevel factor structure of the therapist and client versions of the 12-item Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI; Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006) in the United States and China, and to create a three-item brief version (WAI-B3) using multilevel factor analysis (M-FA) and multilevel item response theory (M-IRT). We gathered eight data sets from two samples each in United States and China with a total of 21,623 sessions from 376 therapists and 2,455 clients. M-FA results with the first four data sets (two American and two Chinese) suggested that the 12-item WAI across therapist and client versions, and in both United States and China showed a dominant general WA factor with three specific subgroup factors corresponding to the Goal, Task, and Bond items. We then constructed a three-item WAI-B3 by selecting items 11, 10, and 9 through M-IRT, as the best representative of Goal, Task, and Bond subscales, respectively, for both the therapist and client versions in United States and China. With the other four data sets (two American, two Chinese) to test the WAI-B3, we found adequate multilevel reliability, structural validity, and convergent validity with the original 12-item WAI scores. Multilevel measurement invariance tests provided tentative and mixed support for the equivalence of WAI-B3 between the American and Chinese data sets and between therapist and client versions. We recommend that the WAI-B3 be used in routine clinical practice to track therapy process, and that the WAI-B3 be tested with other client and therapist populations and cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究旨在调查美国和中国治疗师与来访者版本的12项工作联盟量表简版修订版(WAI;Hatcher & Gillaspy,2006)的多层次因素结构,并使用多层次因素分析(M-FA)和多层次项目反应理论(M-IRT)创建一个三项简短版(WAI-B3)。我们从美国和中国的两个样本中收集了八个数据集,共有来自376名治疗师和2455名来访者的21623次治疗会话。对前四个数据集(两个美国的和两个中国的)进行的M-FA结果表明,治疗师与来访者版本的12项WAI,在美国和中国都显示出一个占主导地位的一般工作联盟因素,以及与目标、任务和联结项目相对应的三个特定子组因素。然后,我们通过M-IRT分别选择第11、10和9项,构建了一个三项WAI-B3,作为美国和中国治疗师与来访者版本中目标、任务和联结子量表的最佳代表。用另外四个数据集(两个美国的,两个中国的)来测试WAI-B3,我们发现它与原始的12项WAI分数具有足够的多层次信度、结构效度和收敛效度。多层次测量不变性检验为WAI-B3在美国和中国数据集之间以及治疗师与来访者版本之间的等效性提供了初步的、混合的支持。我们建议在常规临床实践中使用WAI-B3来跟踪治疗过程,并建议在其他来访者和治疗师群体及文化中对WAI-B3进行测试。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
The development of a Brief Working Alliance Inventory for clients and therapists using multilevel factor analysis and item response theory in the United States and China.运用多级因子分析和项目反应理论,为美国和中国的客户与治疗师开发一份简短工作联盟量表。
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Mar;70(2):172-188. doi: 10.1037/cou0000655. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Development of a brief therapist presence inventory in China using multilevel factor analysis and item response theory.运用多水平因素分析和项目反应理论编制中国简短治疗师在场量表。
Psychother Res. 2023 Apr;33(4):508-523. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2143301. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
3
A strong alliance is not enough: Item-level variation in an alliance measure moderates the alliance strength and client outcome relationship.仅有强大的联盟是不够的:联盟度量中的项目级差异会调节联盟强度与客户结果之间的关系。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Aug 8. doi: 10.1037/cou0000629.
4
Retraction of An et al. (2022).撤回安等人(2022 年)的文章。
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Jul;70(4):402. doi: 10.1037/cou0000682.
5
"The 'dyadic dance': Exploring therapist-client dynamics and client symptom change using actor-partner interdependence modeling and multilevel mixture modeling": Correction to Li (2021).《双人舞:运用演员-伙伴相互依赖模型和多层次混合模型探索治疗师-来访者动态关系和来访者症状变化》:对 Li(2021)的勘误。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):489. doi: 10.1037/cou0000612.
6
The "roller coaster ride": A longitudinal investigation of the dynamic relationship between Chinese counseling trainees' self-efficacy and their clients' outcome and the mediating effects of working alliance and session evaluation.过山车般的体验:中国心理咨询受训者的自我效能与来访者结果之间的动态关系的纵向研究,以及工作联盟和疗程评估的中介作用。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):490-505. doi: 10.1037/cou0000595. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
"The 'roller coaster ride': A longitudinal investigation of the dynamic relationship between Chinese counseling trainees' self-efficacy and their clients' outcome and the mediating effects of working alliance and session evaluation": Correction to Li et al. (2021).《过山车之旅:中国心理咨询学员自我效能与来访者结果的动态关系的纵向研究及工作联盟和疗程评估的中介作用》:对 Li 等人(2021 年)的更正。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):505. doi: 10.1037/cou0000611.
8
Item response theory analysis of Working Alliance Inventory, revised response format, and new Brief Alliance Inventory.工作联盟量表、修订后的反应格式及新的简短联盟量表的项目反应理论分析
Psychother Res. 2016 Nov;26(6):694-718. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1061718. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
9
The "dyadic dance": Exploring therapist-client dynamics and client symptom change using actor-partner interdependence modeling and multilevel mixture modeling.“双重舞”:运用演员-伙伴相互依存模型和多层次混合模型探索治疗师-来访者动态和来访者症状变化。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):474-489. doi: 10.1037/cou0000599. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Working Alliance Inventory-Therapist version: Current and new short forms.工作联盟量表-治疗师版的心理计量学评估:现行及新的短式量表。
Psychother Res. 2020 Jul;30(6):706-717. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1677964. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Working Alliance Inventory- Short Form for Patient (WAI-S-P) in Peruvian Adults.秘鲁成年人患者工作联盟量表简版(WAI-S-P)的效度验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Sep 25;17:2365-2376. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S422733. eCollection 2023.