Li Xu, Zhao Hongyang, Wu Manxuan, Li Feihan, Hill Clara E
Department of Educational Psychology.
Faculty of Psychology.
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Mar;70(2):172-188. doi: 10.1037/cou0000655. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
This study aimed to investigate the multilevel factor structure of the therapist and client versions of the 12-item Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI; Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006) in the United States and China, and to create a three-item brief version (WAI-B3) using multilevel factor analysis (M-FA) and multilevel item response theory (M-IRT). We gathered eight data sets from two samples each in United States and China with a total of 21,623 sessions from 376 therapists and 2,455 clients. M-FA results with the first four data sets (two American and two Chinese) suggested that the 12-item WAI across therapist and client versions, and in both United States and China showed a dominant general WA factor with three specific subgroup factors corresponding to the Goal, Task, and Bond items. We then constructed a three-item WAI-B3 by selecting items 11, 10, and 9 through M-IRT, as the best representative of Goal, Task, and Bond subscales, respectively, for both the therapist and client versions in United States and China. With the other four data sets (two American, two Chinese) to test the WAI-B3, we found adequate multilevel reliability, structural validity, and convergent validity with the original 12-item WAI scores. Multilevel measurement invariance tests provided tentative and mixed support for the equivalence of WAI-B3 between the American and Chinese data sets and between therapist and client versions. We recommend that the WAI-B3 be used in routine clinical practice to track therapy process, and that the WAI-B3 be tested with other client and therapist populations and cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究旨在调查美国和中国治疗师与来访者版本的12项工作联盟量表简版修订版(WAI;Hatcher & Gillaspy,2006)的多层次因素结构,并使用多层次因素分析(M-FA)和多层次项目反应理论(M-IRT)创建一个三项简短版(WAI-B3)。我们从美国和中国的两个样本中收集了八个数据集,共有来自376名治疗师和2455名来访者的21623次治疗会话。对前四个数据集(两个美国的和两个中国的)进行的M-FA结果表明,治疗师与来访者版本的12项WAI,在美国和中国都显示出一个占主导地位的一般工作联盟因素,以及与目标、任务和联结项目相对应的三个特定子组因素。然后,我们通过M-IRT分别选择第11、10和9项,构建了一个三项WAI-B3,作为美国和中国治疗师与来访者版本中目标、任务和联结子量表的最佳代表。用另外四个数据集(两个美国的,两个中国的)来测试WAI-B3,我们发现它与原始的12项WAI分数具有足够的多层次信度、结构效度和收敛效度。多层次测量不变性检验为WAI-B3在美国和中国数据集之间以及治疗师与来访者版本之间的等效性提供了初步的、混合的支持。我们建议在常规临床实践中使用WAI-B3来跟踪治疗过程,并建议在其他来访者和治疗师群体及文化中对WAI-B3进行测试。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)