Suppr超能文献

简化 CT 骨桥评分(sCTSS)的提出及其在强直性脊柱炎患者中的应用与 CTSS 的比较。

Proposal of simplified CT syndesmophyte score (sCTSS) and comparison with CTSS in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120-1 Neungdong-Ro (Hwayang-Dong), Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul, 143-729, Republic of Korea.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 23;13(1):1283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28525-z.

Abstract

The CT syndesmophyte score (CTSS) can evaluate spinal progression more precisely than mSASSS in ankylosing spondylitis (AS); however, it is complex and time consuming. Here, we propose a simplified CTSS (sCTSS) for measuring spinal structural changes in AS. Patients with AS were recruited from a single tertiary hospital. Baseline and 2-year follow-up whole spine CT images were used to calculate CTSS and sCTSS. The sCTSS used the anterior and posterior vertebral corners, and ranged 0-184. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated, as well as the smallest detectable changes. Fifty AS patients were included. For reader 1, the mean sCTSS at baseline and 2-year follow-up were 11.7 ± 14.6 and 15.8 ± 16.1, whereas those for reader 2 were 12.0 ± 12.5 and 15.8 ± 15.7, respectively. The ICCs for CTSS at baseline and at 2-year follow-up were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.99) and 0.98 (0.97-0.99), respectively, and that for changes over the 2 years was 0.48 (95% CI 0.23-0.67). For sCTSS, the ICCs were 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.97), 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98), and 0.58 (95% CI 0.36-0.74), respectively. Detection rates for syndesmophyte progression were comparable between CTSS and sCTSS. The detection rate for syndesmophytes on only lateral side was 13.2 and 11.4%, and 11.4 and 15.2% at baseline and 2-year follow-up (reader 1 and 2). sCTSS and CTSS showed similar detection rates for syndesmophyte progression. sCTSS may be a reliable method for evaluating spinal structural damage in AS.

摘要

CT 骨桥评分(CTSS)可较 mSASSS 更精确地评估强直性脊柱炎(AS)的脊柱进展;但该评分较为复杂且耗时。本研究提出一种简化的 CTSS(sCTSS)来评估 AS 的脊柱结构变化。从一家三级医院招募 AS 患者。使用基线和 2 年随访的全脊柱 CT 图像来计算 CTSS 和 sCTSS。sCTSS 使用前、后椎体角,范围 0-184。计算了组内相关系数(ICC)和最小可检测变化。纳入 50 例 AS 患者。对于读者 1,基线和 2 年随访时 sCTSS 的均值分别为 11.7±14.6 和 15.8±16.1,而读者 2 的相应值分别为 12.0±12.5 和 15.8±15.7。CTSS 基线和 2 年随访时的 ICC 分别为 0.97(95%置信区间[CI] 0.96-0.99)和 0.98(0.97-0.99),2 年时的变化 ICC 为 0.48(95%CI 0.23-0.67)。sCTSS 的 ICC 分别为 0.96(95%CI 0.92-0.97)、0.97(95%CI 0.94-0.98)和 0.58(95%CI 0.36-0.74)。CTSS 和 sCTSS 对骨桥进展的检出率相似。基线和 2 年随访时仅在侧位上发现骨桥的检出率分别为 13.2%和 11.4%(读者 1 和 2)和 11.4%和 15.2%(读者 1 和 2)。sCTSS 和 CTSS 对骨桥进展的检出率相似。sCTSS 可能是一种可靠的评估 AS 脊柱结构损伤的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/749b/9871040/6f06aef5d74c/41598_2023_28525_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验