• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝外伤后肝假性动脉瘤的发生风险与肝损伤严重程度的关系:一项荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。

The risk of hepatic pseudoaneurysm after liver trauma in relation to the severity of liver injury: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.

机构信息

Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 24;408(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02794-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-023-02794-8
PMID:36690777
Abstract

AIM

To determine the risk of hepatic pseudoaneurysm after liver trauma in relation to the severity of liver injury.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in compliance with PRISMA statement standards (Registration Number: CRD42022328834). A search of electronic information sources was conducted to identify all studies reporting the risk of hepatic pseudoaneurysm after liver trauma. The JBI assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data.

RESULTS

A total of 2030 patients from six studies were included. Based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification system, 21% had grade I injury; 33% grade II injury; 28% grade III injury; 12% grade IV injury and 5% grade V injury. The pooled risk of hepatic pseudoaneurysm was 1.8% (95% CI 1.1-2.5%). The risk was 0.4% (0-1.2%) in patients with grade I injury, 0.7% (0-1.7%) in patients with grade II injury; 1.5% (0.4-2.7%) in patients with grade III injury; 4.6% (1.4-7.7%) in patients with grade IV injury and 10.6% (1.8-22.9%) in patients with grade V injury. The average time between liver injury and detection of hepatic pseudoaneurysm was 6 days (95% CI 1-10) CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hepatic pseudoaneurysm after liver trauma increases as the severity of liver injury increases. Hepatic pseudoaneurysms are rare after grade I or grade II injuries, and increasingly common after grades III, IV and V injuries. We recommend routine surveillance imaging in patients with grade III to V injuries.

摘要

目的

确定肝外伤后肝假性动脉瘤的风险与肝损伤严重程度的关系。

方法

我们按照 PRISMA 声明标准(注册号:CRD42022328834)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索电子信息源以确定所有报告肝外伤后肝假性动脉瘤风险的研究。使用 JBI 评估工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。应用随机效应模型计算汇总结局数据。

结果

共有来自六项研究的 2030 名患者纳入研究。根据美国创伤外科学会分类系统,21%为 I 级损伤;33%为 II 级损伤;28%为 III 级损伤;12%为 IV 级损伤;5%为 V 级损伤。肝假性动脉瘤的汇总风险为 1.8%(95%CI 1.1-2.5%)。I 级损伤患者的风险为 0.4%(0-1.2%);II 级损伤患者为 0.7%(0-1.7%);III 级损伤患者为 1.5%(0.4-2.7%);IV 级损伤患者为 4.6%(1.4-7.7%);V 级损伤患者为 10.6%(1.8-22.9%)。肝损伤与肝假性动脉瘤检出之间的平均时间为 6 天(95%CI 1-10)。

结论

肝外伤后肝假性动脉瘤的风险随肝损伤严重程度的增加而增加。I 级或 II 级损伤后肝假性动脉瘤罕见,而 III、IV 和 V 级损伤后则越来越常见。我们建议对 III 至 V 级损伤的患者进行常规监测影像学检查。

相似文献

1
The risk of hepatic pseudoaneurysm after liver trauma in relation to the severity of liver injury: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.肝外伤后肝假性动脉瘤的发生风险与肝损伤严重程度的关系:一项荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 24;408(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02794-8.
2
Hepatic Pseudoaneurysm Incidence After Liver Trauma.肝外伤后假性动脉瘤的发生率。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.054. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
3
Relationship between pseudoaneurysm formation and biloma after successful transarterial embolization for severe hepatic injury: permanent embolization using stainless steel coils prevents pseudoaneurysm formation.严重肝损伤经动脉栓塞成功后假性动脉瘤形成与胆汁瘤之间的关系:使用不锈钢圈进行永久性栓塞可预防假性动脉瘤形成。
J Trauma. 2005 Jul;59(1):49-53; discussion 53-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000171457.18637.69.
4
Delayed splenic pseudoaneurysm identification with surveillance imaging.延迟性脾假性动脉瘤的监测影像学诊断。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jul 1;93(1):113-117. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003615. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
5
Traumatic pseudoaneurysms of the liver and spleen in children: is routine screening warranted?儿童肝脏和脾脏创伤性假性动脉瘤:是否需要常规筛查?
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;46(5):938-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.035.
6
Pediatric hepatic trauma: does clinical course support intensive care unit stay?小儿肝外伤:临床病程是否支持入住重症监护病房?
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Oct;33(10):1459-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90474-2.
7
Outcomes and management of delayed complication after severe blunt liver injury.严重钝性肝损伤后迟发性并发症的结局和处理。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 22;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01691-z.
8
Status of nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries in 1995: a multicenter experience with 404 patients.1995年钝性肝损伤的非手术治疗现状:404例患者的多中心经验
J Trauma. 1996 Jan;40(1):31-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199601000-00007.
9
Blunt liver trauma: a descriptive analysis from a level I trauma center.钝性肝外伤:来自一级创伤中心的描述性分析
BMC Surg. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0369-4.
10
Non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury.重度钝性肝损伤的非手术治疗与手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;2015(8):CD010989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010989.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Surveillance imaging following liver trauma has a low detection rate of liver complications.肝外伤后监测影像学检查对于肝并发症的检出率较低。
Injury. 2022 Jan;53(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.038. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
2
Hepatic Pseudoaneurysm Incidence After Liver Trauma.肝外伤后假性动脉瘤的发生率。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.054. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
3
Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Serious Adverse Outcomes Following Angiography.造影检查后对比剂相关急性肾损伤与严重不良结局
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Mar 24;75(11):1311-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.023.
4
The role of grade of injury in non-operative management of blunt hepatic and splenic trauma: Case series from a multicenter experience.损伤分级在钝性肝脾创伤非手术治疗中的作用:多中心经验的病例系列
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(35):e16746. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016746.
5
Organ injury scaling 2018 update: Spleen, liver, and kidney.《2018年器官损伤分级更新:脾脏、肝脏和肾脏》
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Dec;85(6):1119-1122. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002058.
6
Blunt liver trauma: a descriptive analysis from a level I trauma center.钝性肝外伤:来自一级创伤中心的描述性分析
BMC Surg. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0369-4.
7
Influence of frailty in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a UK-based observational study.衰弱对接受急诊剖腹手术的老年患者的影响:一项基于英国的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e017928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017928.
8
Computed tomography and patient risk: Facts, perceptions and uncertainties.计算机断层扫描与患者风险:事实、认知与不确定性。
World J Radiol. 2016 Dec 28;8(12):902-915. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902.
9
Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.钝性肝损伤的非手术治疗:东部创伤外科学会实践管理指南。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 Suppl 4):S288-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318270160d.
10
American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale I: spleen, liver, and kidney, validation based on the National Trauma Data Bank.美国创伤外科协会器官损伤分级标准 I:脾脏、肝脏和肾脏,基于国家创伤数据库的验证
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):646-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.342. Epub 2008 Aug 30.